Summary
During the winters of 1990/91 and 1991/92, 181 accessions of Triticum dicoccon Schrank from the CIMMYT gene-bank were screened in the field for resistance to Russian wheat aphid, Diuraphis noxia (Kurdjumov). Accessions were sown in hill plots of 10 seeds and artificially infested with D. noxia at the two-leaf growth stage. Hills were visually assessed for damage at tillering, booting and heading. Entries differed significantly in their reaction to D. noxia, and severity of symptoms increased with time. Twenty four of the entries were highly resistant to the aphid. In winter 1991/92, 807 accessions of wild and cultivated wheats (26 species) and synthetic hexaploids were screened similarly for resistance to D. noxia. A large number of A-genome species were resistant, while few D-genome species were identified as resistant. These newly discovered sources of resistance can be used to expand the genetic base of resistance to D. noxia in both bread (T. aestivum L.) and durum wheats (T. turgidum L. convar. durum (Desf.) Mackey).
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Calhoun, D.S., P.A. Burnett, J. Robinson & H.E. Vivar, 1991. Field resistance to Russian wheat aphid in barley: I. symptom expression. Crop Sci. 31: 1464–1467.
Du Toit, F., 1987. Resistance in wheat (Triticum aestivum) to Diuraphis noxia (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Cereal Res. Commun. 15: 175–179.
Du Toit, F., 1989. Inheritance of resistance in two Triticum aestivum lines to Russian wheat aphid (Homoptera: Aphididae). J. Econ. Entomol. 82: 1251–1253.
Fouché, A., R.L. Verhoeven, P.H. Hewitt, M.C. Walters, C.F. Kriel & J. de Jager, 1984. Russian wheat aphid damage on wheat, related cereals and a Bromus grass species. In: M.C. Walters, (Ed.), Progress in Russian wheat aphid (Diuraphis noxia Mordv.) research in the Republic of South Africa. Technical Communication No. 191, Department of Agriculture, Republic of South Africa, pp. 22–23.
Hughes, R.D. & G.F. Maywald, 1990. Forecasting the favourableness of the Australian environment for the Russian wheat aphid, Diuraphis noxia (Homoptera: Aphididae), and its potential impact on Australian wheat yields. Bull. of Entomol. Res. 80: 67–80.
Kimber, G. & K. Tsunewaki, 1988. Genome symbols and plasma types in the wheat genome. pp. 1209–1211, In: Proc. of Seventh International Wheat Genetics Symposium, Cambridge, England, 13–19 July, 1988.
Kovalev, O.V., T.J. Poprawski, A.V. Stekolshchikov, A.B. Vereshchagina & S.A. Gandrabur, 1991. Diuraphis Aizenberg (Hom., Aphididae): key to apterous viviparous females, and a review of Russian literature on the natural history of Diuraphis noxia (Kurdjumov, 1913). J. Appl. Ent. 112: 425–436.
McIntosh, M.S., 1983. Analysis of combined experiments. Agron. J. 75: 153–155.
Mihm, J.A., 1982. Techniques for efficient mass rearing and infestation in screening for host plant resistance to corn earworm, Heliothis zea. CIMMYT, El Batan, Mexico.
Nkongolo, K.K., J.S. Quick, F.B. Peairs & W.L. Meyer, 1991. Inheritance of resistance of PI 372129 wheat to the Russian wheat aphid. Crop Sci. 31: 905–907.
Robinson, J., 1992. Russian wheat aphid: a growing problem for small-grain farmers. Outlook on Agric. 21: 57–62.
Robinson, J., D.S. Calhoun & P.A. Burnett, 1992. Greenhouse rearing and field infestation of Russian wheat aphid using triticale as an example. Southwest. Entomol. 17: 17–21.
SAS Institute, 1985. SAS User's Guide: Statistics, SAS Institute, Cary, N.C.
Sotherton, N.W. & H.F. van Emden, 1982. Laboratory assessments of resistance to the aphids Sitobion avenae and Metopolophium dirhodum in three Triticum species and two modern wheat cultivars. Ann. appl. Biol. 101: 99–107.
Waines, J.G. & D. Barnhart, 1992. Biosystematic research in Aegilops and Triticum. Hereditas 116: 207–212.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Robinson, J., Skovmand, B. Evaluation of emmer wheat and other Triticeae for resistance to Russian wheat aphid. Genet Resour Crop Evol 39, 159–163 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00051929
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00051929