Skip to main content
Log in

Understanding of structured problem solutions

  • Published:
Instructional Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Much of the material provided in science courses consists of sample solutions to problems. This study is concerned with how such structured material is understood, what is earmarked for storage, what remains stored and how useful this is for later ability to recreate the problem solution.

Understanding was assumed to be the result of a cognitive process in which information about the material understood is stored in memory. Twelve S's were required to “think aloud” as they understood three problem solutions: the solution of the Missionaries and Cannibals problem, a geometry proof, and a plan for another geometry proof. Each solution was presented step by step as requested by S. Immediately after he had understood the solution S was asked to recall the “outstanding points.” A week later he was asked to repeat the recall and to reproduce the solution.

A hand coding of the “thinking aloud” protocol was analysed by a computer programme. Patterns detected by the programme suggest that the understanding process of an S has some consistency for different tasks. An analysis of the recalls of outstanding points showed that the kinds of points best retained were the context of the problems and subproblems within the solution. In the Missionaries and Cannibals task subproblems were positions reached. S's who recalled positions rather than moves reproduced the solution faster. In the geometry tasks the subproblems were steps with two or more premises. S's who recalled more of these reproduced the solution faster. In the geometry proof these S's had more adequately processed these steps when they were attempting to understand the solution. The importance of the S's method for deciding when he understands is suggested.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ausubel, D. P. (1963). The Psychology of Meaningful Verbal Learning. New York: Grune and Stratton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlyne, D. E. (1965). Structure and Direction in Thinking. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brée, D. S. (1968). “The Understanding Process; as Seen in Geometry Theorems and the Missionaries and Cannibals Problem.” Unpublished Ph. D Thesis. 2 vols. Vol. 1 available from University Microfilms, No. 69–18588. Pittsburgh: Carnegie_Mellon University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brée, D. S. (1970). “Computer Program for Analysing Protocols of Understanding,” Methodology and Science, 3(3), 18–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • College Entrance Examination Board (1965a). Ability Tests; A Description of the College Boards. Princeton: Educational Testing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • College Entrance Examination Board (1965b). A chievement Test; A Description of the College Boards. Princeton: Educational Testing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernst, G. W. and Newell, A. (1967). GPS: A Case Study in Generality and Problem Solving. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, E. G.; Marin, J.; and Stone, P. J. (1966). Experiments in Induction. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katona, G. (1940). Organising and Memorising. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moise, E. E. (1963). Elementary Geometry from an Axiomatic Standpoint. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neisser, V. (1967). Cognitive Psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell, A. (1968). “On the Analysis of Human Problem Solving Protocols,” in J. C.Gardin and B.Jaulin, eds., Calcul et formalisation dans les sciences de l'homme. Paris: Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, pp. 146–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell, A.; Shaw, J. C.; and Simon, H. A. (1960). “A Variety of Intelligent Learning in a General Problem Solver,” in M. C.Yovitts and S.Cameron, eds., Self-Organising Systems. New York: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell, A., and Simon, H. A. (1972). Human Problem Solving. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osgood, C. E. (1952). “The Nature and Measurement of Meaning,” Psychological Bulletin, 49, 197–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • School Mathematics Study Group (1961). Geometry, Volume 2. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, S. (1956). Non-Parametric Statistics. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A., and Feigenbaum, E. A. (1964). “An Information-Processing Theory of Some Effects of Similarity, Familiarization and Meaningfulness in Verbal Learning,” Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour. 3, 385–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A., and Kotovsky, K. (1963). “Human Acquisition of Concepts for Sequential Patterns,” Psychological Review, 70, 534–546.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

For many of the ideas presented in this paper I am indebted to Dr. H. Clark, Dr. B. F. Green, Dr. L. W. Gregg, Dr. R. J. Hays and in particular Professor H. A. Simon. The research was carried out at Carnegie-Mellon University, under grants from the Science Research Council of Great Britain and the National Institute of Mental Health of the U.S.A. (MH-07722).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brée, D.S. Understanding of structured problem solutions. Instr Sci 3, 327–350 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00051900

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00051900

Keywords

Navigation