Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of syntaxonomic schemes of aquatic plant communities by cluster analysis

  • Published:
Vegetatio Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Numerical classification methods can simulate strategies of intuitive classifications. This paper considers two different intuitive syntaxonomic schemes suggested for stagnant eutrophic fresh-water communities with a view to identifying which among the commonest numerical methods of classification fits the two intuitive schemes best. Comparison of classifications using an information function and discriminant analysis revealed that the different numerical methods simulate different intuitive schemes, but the results of the numerical classifications are always judged superior. Two new syntaxonomic schemes optimizing the sharpness between the syntaxa are proposed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderberg, M. R., 1973. Cluster analysis for applications, Academic Press, New York & London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avena, G., Blasi, C., Feoli, E. & Scoppola, A., 1981. Measurement of the predictive value of species list for species cover in phytosociological samples. Vegetatio 45: 77–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun-Blanquet, J. & Tüxen, R., 1943. Übersicht der höheren Vegetationseinheiten Mitteleuropas (unter Ausschluss der Hochgebirge), Comm. SIGMA 84.

  • Den, Hartog, C. & Segal, S., 1964. A new classification of the waterplant communities. Acta Bot. Neerl. 13: 367–393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feoli, E. & Lagonegro, M., 1979. Intersection analysis in phytosoclology: computer program and applications. Vegetatio 40: 55–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feoli, E. & Lausi, D., 1980. Hierarehlcal levels in syntaxopomy based on information functions. Vegetatio 42: 113–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feoli, E., Biondani, E. & Lagonegro, M., 1980. Detection of coenoclines in indirect gradient analysis (Italian with English summary). I. Italian Ecological Congress, Salsomaggiore 21–24 Oct. 1980 (in press).

  • Gerdol, R., Piccoli, F. & Bassi, M., 1979. Contributo alla conoscenza floristica e vegetazionale degli ambienti umidi del Ferrarese: I maceri. Ann. Univ. Ferrara, n.s. sez. Biologia 2: 1–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klecka, W. R., 1975. Discriminant analysis. In: H., Nie et al., (eds.): Statistical package for social seiences (SPSS). Me Graw-Hill, New York: 434–467.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lohmeyer, W., 1962. Contribution à l'unification du système phytosociologique pour l'Europe moyenne et nord-occidentale. Melhoramento 15: 137–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maarel, E. van der, 1979a. Multivariate methods in Phytosociology with reference to the Netherlands. In: M. J. A. Werger (ed.). The study of vegetation. Junk.

  • Maarel, E.van der, 1979b. Transformation of cover-abundance values in phytosociology and its effects on community similarity. Vegetatio 39: 97–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oberdorfer, E., 1957. Süddeutsche Pflanzengesellschaften. 1nd ed. Fischer, Jena.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oberdorfer, E., 1977. Süddeutsche Pflanzengesellschaften, 2nd ed. Bd. 1. Fischer, Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlóci, L., 1966. Geometric models in ecology: I. The theory and application of some ordination methods. J. Ecol. 54: 193–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlóci, L., 1967. An agglomerative method for classification of plant communities. J. Ecol. 55: 193–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlóci, L., 1978. Multivariate analysis in vegetation research. 2nd ed. Junk, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlóci, L. & Mukkatu, M. M., 1973. The effect of species number and type of data on the resemblance structure of a phytosociological collection. J. Ecol. 61: 37–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sneath, P. H. A. & Sokal, R. R., 1973. Numerical taxonomy. The principles and practice of numerical classification. Freeman, St. Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strahler, A. H., 1977. Response of woody species to site factors in Maryland, USA: Evaluation of sampling plans and of continuous and binary measurement techniques. Vegetatio 35: 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strahler, A. H., 1978. Binary discriminant analysis: a new method for investigating species-environment relationships. Ecology 50: 108–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westhoff, V. & Maarel, E.van der, 1978. The Braun-Blanquet approach. 2nd ed. In: R. H., Whittaker (ed.): Classification of plant communities, p. 287–399. Junk, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiegleb, G., 1978. Der soziologisehe Konnex der 47 häufigsten Gefässmakrophyten Mitteleuropas. Vegetatio 38: 165–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiegleb, G., 1980. Some applications of principal component analysis in vegetation: Ecological research of aquatic communities. Vegetatio 42: 67–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, W. T. & Dale, M. B., 1962. Partition correlation matrices for heterogeneous quantitative data. Nature (London) 196: 602.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The authors are very grateful to Prof. E. van der Maarel and to Prof. L. Orlóci for reading and correcting the manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Feoli, E., Gerdol, R. Evaluation of syntaxonomic schemes of aquatic plant communities by cluster analysis. Vegetatio 49, 21–27 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00051559

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00051559

Keywords

Navigation