Skip to main content
Log in

Central configurations and a theorem of palmore

  • Published:
Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The concept of central configuration is important in the study of total collisions or the relative equilibrium state of a rotating system in the N-body problem. However, relatively few such configurations are known. Aided by a new global optimizer, we have been able to construct new families of coplanar central configurations having particles of equal mass, and extend these constructions to some configurations with differing masses and the non-coplanar case. Meyer and Schmidt had shown that a theorem of Palmore concerning coplanar central configurations was incorrect for N equal masses where 6 ⩽ N ⩽ 20 but presented a simple analytic argument only for N = 6. Using straightforward analytic arguments and inequalities we also disprove this theorem for 2N equal masses with N ⩾ 3.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Duboshin, G. N.: 1985, ‘Cas special du probleme restreint des plusieurs corps’, Celest. Meek, 35, 329.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Donnelly, R. and Rogers, J.: 1988, ‘A discrete search technique for global optimization’, Quant. Chem., 22, 507–513.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Griewank, A.: 1981, ‘Generalized descent for global optimization’, J. Optimization Theory and Appl., 24, 11–39.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Klemperer, W. B.: 1962, ‘Some properties of rosette configurations of gravitating bodies in homographic equilibrium’, Astron. J., 67, 162.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Longley, W. R.: 1907, ‘Some particular solutions in the problem of n bodies’, Bull. Am. Math. Soc., 13, 000–000.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Meyer, K. and Schmidt, D.: 1988, ‘Bifurcations of relative equilibria in the N-body and Kirchoff problems, Siam J. Math. Anal., 19, 1295–1313.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Palmore, J.: 1976, ‘Measure of degenerate relative equilibria I’, Ann. of Math., 104, 421–429.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Papay, M.: 1989, GLIDE Program Optimization Results, Interoffice Correspondence, TRW Defense Systems Group, 27 March.

  9. Rogers, J. and Donnelly, R.: 1989, ‘A search technique for optimization in a chaotic environment, J. Optimization Theory and Appl., 61, 111–121.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rogers, J., Donnelly, R., Slaminka, E. and Butler, R.: ‘Bounded orbits and chaotic behavior for a dynamical system used in global optimization’, submitted to Nonlinear Anal., Th., Meth. and Appl.

  11. Saari, D.: 1980, ‘On the role and the properties on n body central configurations’, Celest. Mech., 21, 920.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Saari, D. and Hulkower, N.: 1981, ‘On the manifolds of total collapse orbits and of completely parabolic orbits for the n-body problem’, J. Diff. Eq., 41, 27–43.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wintner, A.: 1941, The Analytical Foundations of Celestial Mechanics, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, N.J., U.S.A.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Slaminka, E.E., Woerner, K.D. Central configurations and a theorem of palmore. Celestial Mech Dyn Astr 48, 347–355 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00049389

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00049389

Keywords

Navigation