Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

On choice of substrate and habitat in brachionid rotifers

  • Autoecology
  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Information on the distribution of 28 rotifers of the family Brachionidae from diverse waters in south and central Sweden was analyzed to reveal their relationships to substrate and habitat. Some brachionids are preferably planktic, others periphytic and/or benthic. Some non-planktic habitats are utilized more than others, but there is no evidence of a chemical attraction from any substrate. Instead, some substrates seem to be avoided, possibly depending on a poorer flora of periphytic algae. Besides substrate type, the following factors are found to be important for creating separate ecological niches in the brachionid family: temperature, oxygen content, trophic degree, chemical environment, food choice and sensitivity to predation. It is possible to delineate separate ecological niches for all brachionid rotifers, implying that Hutchinson's ideas about the ‘plankton paradox’ are contradicted. Some species are specialists, other are generalists, the latter being characterized by a great morphological variation. The species are adapted in different ways to their preferential habitats, as regards foot, egg-carrying, protrusions and other lorical structures etc. Longer spines, for instance, are generally found in more transparent water, being a supposed protection against visual predators.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, R. S., 1970. Predator-prey relationships and predation rates for crustacean zooplankters from some lakes in western Canada. Ca. J. Zool. 48: 1229–1240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateman, L. & C. Davis, 1980. The Rotifera of hummock-hollow formations in a poor (mesotrophic) fen in Newfoundland. Int. Revue Hydrobol. 65: 127–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp, P. M. de, 1909. Recherches sur les Rotifères: les formations tègumentaires et l'appareil digestif. Arch. Zool. exp. gèn., ser. 4, 10: 1–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bērziņš, B. & B. Pejler, 1987. Rotifer occurrence in relation to pH. Hydrobiologia 147: 107–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogdan, K., J. Gilbert & P. Starkweather, 1980. In situ clearance rates of planktonic rotifers. Hydrobiologia 73: 73–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlin, B., 1943. Die Planktonrotatorien des Motalaström. Zur Taxonomie und Ökologie der Planktonrotatorien. Medd. Lunds Univ. limnol. Instn. 5: 1–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donner, J., 1964. Die Rotatorien-Synusien submerser Makrophyten der Donau bei Wien und mehrerer Alpenbäche. Arch. Hydrobiol. Suppl. 27: 227–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donner, J., 1970. Die Rädertierbestände submerser Moose der Salzach und anderer Wasser-Biotope des Flussgebietes. Arch. Hydrobiol. 36: 109–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donner, J., 1972. Die Rädertierbestände submerser Moose und weiterer Merotope im Bereich der Stauräume der Donau an der deutsch-österreichischen Landesgrenze. Arch. Hydrobiol. 44: 49–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmondson, W. T., 1944. Ecological studies of sessile Rotatoria. Part I. Factors affecting distribution. Ecol. Monogr. 14: 31–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmondson, W. T., 1945. Ecological studies of sessile Rotatoria. Part II. Dynamics of populations and social structures. Ecol. Monogr. 15: 141–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francez, A.-J., 1984. Rotifères sessiles observès en Auvergne. Cahiers Naturalistes, Bull. nat. paris., N.S. 40: 73–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francez, A.-J. & J. Dévaux, 1985. Répartition des rotifères dans deux lacs-tourbieres du Massif Central (France). Hydrobiologia 128: 265–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghilarov, A. M., 1984. The paradox of the plankton reconsidered; or, why do species coexist? Oikos 43: 46–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, J. & C. Williamson, 1978. Predator-prey behavior and its effect on rotifer survival and associations of Mesocyclops edax, Asplanchna girodi, Polyarthra vulgaris, and Keratella cochlearis. Oecologia 37: 13–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauer, J., 1935. Rotatorien aus dem Schluchseemoor und seiner Umgebung. Verh. natures. Ver. Karlsruhe 29: 47–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendelberg, M., G. Morling & B. Pejler, 1979. The ultrastructure of the lorica of the rotifer Keratella serrulata (Ehrbg). Zoon 7: 49–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, G. E., 1961. The paradox of the plankton. Am. Nat. 95: 137–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koste, W., 1978. Rotatoria. Die Rädertiere Mitteleuropas. Ein Bestimmungswerk begr. von Max Voigt. Überordning Monogononta. Vol. l–2. 673 pp. + 234 pl.

  • Laxhuber, R. & U. Hartmann, 1988. The influence of temperature on the life cycle of the cold-stenothermal rotifer Notholca caudata Carlin. Verh. int. Ver. Limnol. 23: 2016–2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makarewicz, J. & G. Likens, 1975. Niche analysis of a zooplankton community. Science 190: 1000–1003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, L. V., 1976. Rotifers in the Sphagnum pools on Thursley Common. Microscopy 33: 90–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, L. V., 1977. Rotifers in the Sphagnum pools on Thursley Common. Part 2. Microscopy 33: 236–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, L., 1980a. Studies on the grazing rate of Notholca squamula Müller on Asterionella formosa Hass. at different temperatures. Hydrobiologia 73: 79–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, L., 1980b. On the ecology of Notholca squamula Müller in Loch Leven, Kinross, Scotland. Hydrobiologia 73: 177–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meuche, A., 1939. Die Fauna im Algenbewuchs. Nach Untersuchungen im Litoral ostholsteinischer Seen. Arch. Hydrobiol. 34: 349–520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miracle, M. R., 1977. Migration, patchiness, and distribution in time and space of planktonic rotifers. Arch. Hydrobiol. Beih. 8: 19–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morling, G. & B. Pejler, in press. Acidification and zooplankton development in some west-Swedish lakes 1966–1983. Limnologica 21.

  • Nilsson, N. A. & B. Pejler, 1973. On the relation between fish fauna and zooplankton composition in North Swedish lakes. Rep. Inst. Freshw. Res. Drottningholm 53: 51–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyberg, P., 1984. Impact of Chaoborus predation on planktonic crustacean communities in some acidified and limed forest lakes in Sweden. Rep. Inst. Freshw. Res. Drottningholm 61: 154–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pejler, B., 1962a. Morphological studies on the genera Notholca, Kellicottia and Keratella (Rotatoria). Zool. Bidr. Uppsala 33: 295–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pejler, B., 1962b. On the variation of the rotifer Keratella cochlearis (Gosse). Zool. Bidr. Uppsala 35: 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pejler, B., 1965. Regional-ecological studies of Swedish fresh-water zooplankton. Zool. Bidr. Uppsala 36: 407–515.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pejler, B., 1977. On the global distribution of the family Brachionidae (Rotatoria). Arch. Hydrobiol. Suppl. 53: 255–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pejler, B., 1980. Variation in the genus Keratella. Hydrobiologia 73: 207–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pejler, B., 1987. Bruno Bērziņš in memoriam. 1909–1985. Hydrobiologia 147: 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pejler, B. & B. Bērziņš, 1989. Rotifer occurrence in relation to temperature. Hydrobiologia 175: 223–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pejler, B. & B. Bērziņš, 1989. Rotifer occurrence in relation to oxygen content. Hydrobiologia 183: 165–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pejler, B. & B. Bērziņš, 1989. Rotifer occurrence and trophic degree. Hydrobiologia 172: 171–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pejler, B. & B. Bērziņš, 1989. Rotifer occurrence in relation to water colour. Hydrobiologia 184: 23–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, R. & U. Persson, 1987. Comparison of the biological effects of humic materials under acidified conditions. Sci. Tot. Envir. 62: 387–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pijanowska, J. & P. Dawidowicz, 1987. The lack of vertical migration in Daphnia: the effect of homogenously distributed food. Hydrobiologia 148: 175–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pourriot, R., 1977. Food and feeding habits of Rotifera. Arch. Hydrobiol. Beih. 8: 243–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruttner-Kolisko, A.,1956. Der Lebensraum des Limnopsammals. Verh. dtsch. zool. Ges. Hamburg 1956: 421–427.

  • Ruttner-Kolisko, A., 1972. Rotatoria. Binnengewässer 26: 99–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stemberger, R., 1982. Mechanisms controlling selection and rates of predation on rotifers in Cyclops bicuspidatus thomasi. Ph. D. Thesis, Univ. Mich. 95 pp.

  • Stemberger, R. & M. Evans, 1984. Rotifer seasonal succession and copepod predation in Lake Michigan. J. Great Lakes Res. 10: 417–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stemberger, R. & J. Gilbert, 1984. Spine development in the rotifer Keratella cochlearis: induction by cyclopoid copepods and Asplanchna. Freshwat. Biol. 14: 639–647.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stemberger, R. & J. Gilbert, 1987. Defenses of planktonic rotifers against predators. In: W. C. Kerfoot and A. Sih (eds.). Predation. Direct and indirect impacts on aquatic communities. 386 pp.

  • Sudzuki, M., 1957. Studies on the egg-carrying types in Rotifera. II. Genera Brachionus and Keratella. Zool. Mag., Tokyo 66: 11–20. (Japanese, with English summary.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Thane-Fenchel, A., 1968. Distribution and ecology of nonplanktonic brackish-water rotifers from Scandinavian waters. Ophelia 5: 273–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tzschaschel, G., 1983. Seasonal abundance of psammon rotifers. Hydrobiologia 104: 275–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, R., 1980. Ecology of sessile rotifers. Hydrobiologia 73: 181–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walz, N., 1983. Continuous culture of the pelagic rotifers Keratella cochlearis and Brachionus angularis. Arch. Hydrobiol. 98: 70–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wesenberg-Lund, C., 1930. Contributions to the biology of the Rotifera. II. The periodicity and sexual periods. K. danske vidensk. Selsk., nat.-math. Afd., Raekke 9, Bd 2, no. 1. 230 pp.

  • Williamson, C., 1983. Invertebrate predation on planktonic rotifers. Hydrobiologia 104: 385–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wulfert, K., 1951. Das Naturschutzgebiet auf dem Glatzer Schneeberg. Die Rädertiere des Naturschutzgebietes. Arch. Hydrobiol. 44: 441–471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wulfert, K., 1956. Die Rädertiere des Teufelssees bei Friedrichshagen. Arch. Hydrobiol. 51: 457–495.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Limnology, P.O. Box 557, 751 22, Uppsala, Sweden

    Birger Pejler & Bruno Bērziņš

Authors
  1. Birger Pejler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bruno Bērziņš
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pejler, B., Bērziņš, B. On choice of substrate and habitat in brachionid rotifers. Hydrobiologia 186, 137–144 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00048905

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00048905

Key words

Search

Navigation