Skip to main content
Log in

Contrasting litter effects on old field tree germination and emergence

  • Published:
Vegetatio Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Because the fate of seeds is critical to understanding the invasion of old fields by trees, and plant litter is an important component defining the old field microsite of dispersed seeds, I investigated the effects of litter type (Solidago spp./goldenrod,Quercus spp./oak, mixed) and litter amount (100–800 g/m2) on tree seed germination and seedling emergence. I found that at all densities bothSolidago andQuercus litter greatly reduced emergence of the small-seeded, bird-dispersed species,Juniperus virginiana andCornus florida. For one of the large-seeded, mammal-dispersed species,Carya tomentosa, high densitySolidago litter and high density mixed litter treatments reduced emergence. For the other large-seeded species,Quercus rubra, the high density mixed litter treatment and all levels ofSolidago litter reduced emergence.Quercus seedlings emerged twice as often as the other three species in control pots without litter.Carya emerged before the other species but the high density oak treatment delayed the expansion of its cotyledons. My results suggest that litter may contribute to the slow rate of tree invasion and the low probability of tree establishment in old fields. However, old field litter studies taken together point to the difficulty in drawing general conclusions about any ‘net effect’ of litter on old field tree establishment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbott, H. G. & Quink, T. F. 1970. Ecology of eastern white pine seed caches made by small forest mammals. Ecology 51: 271–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bard, G. E. 1952. Secondary succession on the Piedmont of New Jersey. Ecological Monographs 22: 195–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, L. I. 1931. Influence of forest litter on the germination and early survival of chestnut oak,Quercus montana Willd. Ecology 12: 476–484.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bazzaz, F. A. 1968. Succession on abandoned fields in the Shawnee Hills, Southern Illinois. Ecology 49: 924–936.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buell, M. F., Buell, H. F., Small, J. A. & Siccama, T. G. 1971. Invasion of trees in secondary succession on the New Jersey piedmont. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 98: 67–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton, P. J. 1982. The effects of temperature and light onMetrosideros polymorpha seed germination. Pacific Science 36: 229–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton, P. J. & Bazzaz, F. A. 1991. Tree seedling emergence on interactive temperature and moisture gradients and in patches of old-field vegetation. American Journal of Botany 78: 131–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, J. H., Noble, I. R. & Slatyer, R. O. 1987. On the mechanisms producing successional change. Oikos 50: 136–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Facelli, J. M. & Carson, W. P. 1991. Heterogeneity of plant litter accumulation in successional communities. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 118: 62–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Facelli, J. M. & Pickett, S. T. A. 1991a. Plant litter: Its dynamics and effects on plant community structure. The Botanical Review 57: 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Facelli, J. M. & Pickett, S. T. A. 1991b. Plant litter: light interception and effects on an oldfield plant community. Ecology 72: 1024–1031.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenner, M. 1985. Seed Ecology. Chapman and Hall, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowells, H. A. 1965. Silvics of forest trees of the United States. USDA Forest Service Agricultural Handbook No. 271, 762 p.

  • Florence, R. G. 1965. Decline of old-growth redwood forests in relation to some soil microbiological processes. Ecology 46: 52–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaines, S. D. & Rice, W. R. 1990. Analysis of biological data when there are ordered expectations. American Naturalist 135: 310–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, D. S. & Marks, P. L. 1991. Tree and shrub seedling colonization of old fields in central New York. Ecological Monographs 61: 183–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gholz, H. L., Hawk, G. M., Campbell, A., Cromack, K. & Brown, A. T. 1985. Early vegetation recovery and element cycles on a clearcut watershed in western Oregon. Canadian Journal of Forestry Research 15: 400–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleason, H. A. & Cronquist, A. 1963. Manual of Vascular Plants of Northeastern United States and Adjacent Canada. D. Van Nostrand Company, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grime, J. P. 1979. Plant strategies and vegetation processes. John Wiley and Son, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, K. L. & Werner, P. A. 1982. Colonizing abilities of biennial plant species in relation to ground cover: Implications for their distributions in a successional sere. Ecology 63: 921–931.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamrick, J. L. & Lee, J. M. 1987. Effect of soil surface topography and litter cover on the germination, survival and growth of musk thistle (Carduus nutans). American Journal of Botany 74: 451–457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livingston, R. B. & Allessio, M. L. 1968. Buried viable seed in successional field and forest stands, Harvard Forest, Massachusetts. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 95: 58–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, B. C. & Facelli, J. M. 1990. Microdisturbances in old fields and forests: Implications for woody seedling establishment. Oikos 58: 27–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monk, C. D. & Gabrielson, F. C. 1985. Effects of shade, litter and root competition on old field vegetation in South Carolina. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 112: 383–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myster, R. W. & Pickett, S. T. A. 1992. Effects of palatability and dispersal mode on spatial patterns of trees in old fields. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 119: 145–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myster, R. W. & Pickett, S. T. A. 1993. Effects of litter, distance, density and vegetation patch type on postdisperal tree seed predation in old fields. Oikos 66: 381–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myster, R. W. 1993. Tree invasion and establishment in old fields at Hutcheson Memorial Forest. The Botanical Review 59: 251–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oosting, H. J. & Humphreys, M. E. 1940. Buried viable seeds in a successional series of old field and forest soils. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 67: 253–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, C. & Facelli, J. M. 1992. Contrasting germination and seedling growth ofBetula alleghaniensis andRhus typhina subjected to various amounts and types of plant litter. American Journal of Botany 79: 1209–1216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickett, S. T. A. 1982. Population patterns through twenty years of oldfield succession. Vegetatio 49: 45–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pons, T. L. 1989. Breaking of seed dormancy by nitrate as a gap detection mechanism. Annals of Botany 63: 139–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, M. V. & Jenkins, S. H. 1986. Rodents as seed consumers and dispersers. In: Murray, DR (ed) Seed dispersal. Academic Press, New York. pp 191–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runkle, J. R. 1985. Disturbance regimes in temperate forests. In: Pickett, S. T. A. & White, P. S. (eds) The ecology of natural disturbance and patch dynamics. Academic Press, Orlando, FL. pp 17–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS 1985 SAS/STAT User's Guide. Release 6.03 Edition. SAS Institute Inc., CARY, NC

    Google Scholar 

  • Schopmeyer, C. S. 1974. Seeds of woody plants in the United States. Handbook no.450. Forest Service, USDA, Washington, D.C, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sork, V. L. 1983. Distribution of pignut hickoryCarya glabra along a forest to edge transect and factors affecting seedling recruitment. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 10: 494–506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, D. H. 1982. The zonation of plants in fresh water lakes. Advances in Ecological Research 12: 37–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sydes, C. & J. P.Grime. 1981. Effects of tree litter on herbaceous vegetation in the deciduous woodlands. II An experimental investigation. Journal of Ecology 69: 249–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van derValk, A. G. 1974. Environmental factors controlling the distribution of forbs on coastal foredunes in Cape Hatteras National Seashore. Canadian Journal of Botany 52: 1057–1073.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van derValk, A. G. 1986. The impact of litter and annual plants on recruitment from the seed bank of a lacustrine wetland. Aquatic Botany 24: 13–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vazquez-Yanes, C., A.Orozco-Segovia, E.Rincon, M. E.Sanchez-Coronado, P.Huante, J. R.Toledo & V. L.Barradas. 1990. Light beneath the litter in a tropical forest: Effect on seed germination. Ecology 71: 1952–1958.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Myster, R.W. Contrasting litter effects on old field tree germination and emergence. Vegetatio 114, 169–174 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00048396

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00048396

Key words

Navigation