Skip to main content
Log in

CO2 and plants: revisited

  • CO2 Enrichment: Biosphere-Atmosphere Exchange
  • Published:
Vegetatio Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The decade-long USA research program on the direct effects of CO2 enrichment on vegetation has achieved important milestones and has produced a number of interesting and exciting findings. Research beginning in 1980 focused on field experiments to determine whether phenomena observed in the laboratory indeed occurred in natural environments. The answer is yes. Data obtained from numerous field studies show mixed response of crop and native species to CO2 enrichment however. Nearly all experiments demonstrate that plants exhibit positive gain when grown at elevated CO2; although the magnitude varies greatly. Most crop responses range from 30 to 50 % increase in yield. Results from long-term experiments with woody species and ecosystems are even more variable. Huge growth responses (100 to nearly 300 % increase relative to controls) are reported from several tree experiments and the salt-marsh ecosystem experiment. Other results from experiments with woody species and the tundra ecosystem suggest little no effect of CO2 on physiology, growth or productivity. Numerous studies of the physiology of the CO2 effect are continuing in attempts to understand controlling mechanisms and to explain the variable growth responses. Particular emphasis needs to be given to physiological measures of interactions involving the CO2 effect and other environmental influences, and to the wide-ranging observations of photosynthesis acclimation to CO2. Prospects for future research are identified.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amthor, J. S. 1991. Respiration in a future, higher-CO2 world. Plant, Cell Environ. 14: 13–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amthor, J. S., Koch, G. W. & Bloom, A. J. 1992. CO2 inhibits respiration in leaves ofRumex crispus L. Plant Physiol. 98: 759–760.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arp, W. J. 1991. Effects of source-sink relations on photosynthetic acclimation to elevated CO2. Plant, Cell Environ. 14: (In press).

  • Arp, W. J. & Drake, B. G. 1991. Increased photosynthetic capacity ofScirpus olnei after four years of exposure to elevated CO2. Plant Cell Environment 14(9).

  • Bazzaz, F. A. 1990. The response of natural ecosystems to the rising global CO2 levels. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 21: 167–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunce, J. 1990. Short and long-term inhibition of respiratory carbon dioxide efflux by elevated carbon dioxide. Ann. Bot. 65: 637–642.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, W. J., Allen, L. H.Jr. & Bowes, G. 1988. Effects of CO2 concentration on rubisco activity, amount and photosynthesis in soybean leaves. Plant Physiology 88: 1310–1316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J. J. & Sung, J. M. 1990. Gas exchange rate and yield responses of virginia-type peanut to carbon dioxide enrichment. Crop Science. 30: 1085–1089.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conroy, J. 1989. Influence of high CO2 onPinus radiata, Ph. D. Thesis, Maqauerie Univ, School of Biological Sciences.

  • Dahlman, R. C. 1983., Strain, B. R., & Rogers, H. H. 1985. Research on the response of vegetation to elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide. J. Environ. Qual. 14: 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlman, R. C. 1984. Vegetation Response to Carbon Dioxide: Research Plan. DOE/ER-0187. pp 32.

  • Delucia, E. H., Sasek, T. W. & Strain, B. R. 1985. Photosynthetic inhibition after long-term exposure to elevated levels of atmoshheric carbon dioxide. Photosynthesis Research 7: 175–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downton, W. J. S., Bjorkman, O. & Pike, C. S. 1980. Consequences of increased atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide for growth and photosynthesis of higher plants.In Pearman, G. I., ed. Carbon Dioxide and Climate. Australian Academy of Science, Canberra. pp. 143–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drake B. G. 1989. Elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration increases carbon sequestering coastal wetlands. Dept of Energy Research Project of the Month, October 1989. 3 pp. (available from CDIAC, P. O Box X, Oak Ridge TN, 37830).

  • Drake, B. G., Ziska, L. H. Bunce, J. A., Arp, W. J., Hogan, K., Smith A. P. Dark respiration in plants grown in the field exposed to elevated atmospheric CO2. Submitted to Plant, Cell Environ.

  • Ehret, D. L. & Jolliffe, P. A. 1985. Photosynthetic carbon dioxide exchange of bean plans grown at elevated carbon dioxide concentrations. Can J. Bot. 63:2026–2030.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendrey, G. R., Kimball, B. 1990. FACE: Free-air carbon dioxide enrichment; Application to field-grown cotton. BNL Report 46155. 17 pp.

  • Houghton, J. T., Jenkins, G. J., & Ephraums, J. J. 1990. Climate Change: The IPCC Scientific Assessment. Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Idso, S. B., Kimball, B. A., Anderson, M. G., & Mauney, J. R. 1987. Effects of atmospheric CO2 enrichment on plant growth: The interactive role of air temperature. Agric. Ecosystems Environ. 20: 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Idso, S. B., Kimball, B. A. 1991. Effects of two and a half years of atmospheric CO2 enrichment on the root density distribution of three-year-old sour orange trees. Agric. For. Meterol. 55: 345–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis, P. G. 1989. Atmospheric carbon dioxide and forests. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. B 324: 369–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeling, C. D., Bacastow, R. B., Carter, A. F., Piper, S. C., Whorf, T. P., Heimann, M., Mook, W. G., & Roeloffzen, H. 1989. A three dimensional model of atmospheric CO2 transport based on observed winds: 1. Analysis of observational data.In: Aspects of climate variability in the Pacific and the Western Americas, D. H., Peterson (ed), Geophysical Monograph 55, AGU, Washington (USA), 165–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimball, B. A. 1983. Carbon dioxide and agricultural yield: an assemblage and analysis of 430 observations. Agron. J. 75: 779–788.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimball, B. A. 1985a. Carbon dioxide stimulation of growth and yield under environmental restraints. In: Enoch, H. Z. & Kimball, B. A. (eds), CO2 Enrichment of Greenhouse Crops, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimball, B. A. 1985b. Influence of elevated CO2 on crop yield. In: Enoch, H. Z. & Kimball, B. A. (eds), CO2 Enrichment of Greenhouse Crops, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kriedemann, P. E. & Wong, S. C. 1984. Growth response and photosynthetic acclimation to CO2; comparative behavior in two C3 crop species. Acta Hort. 162: 113–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemon, E. R. (ed) 1983. CO2 and Plants: The Response of Plants to Rising Levels of Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide. AAAS Selected Symposium 84. 280 pp.

  • Lincoln, D. E., Couvet, D., Sionit, N. 1986. Response of an insect herbivore to host plants grown in enriched carbon dioxide atmospheres. Oceologia 69: 556–560.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norby, R. J. 1991. Response of white oak and yellow poplar in a two-year field CO2 experiment. Personal communication. (Note: the yellow poplar data are also reported in Norby, R. J., C. A. Gunderson, S. D. Wullschleger, E. G. O'Neill and M. K. MacCracken. Productivity and compensatory responses of yellow poplar trees in elevated CO2. Nature (in press).

  • Norby, R. J., O'Neill, E. G. 1991. Leaf area compensation and nutrient interactions in CO2-enriched seedlings of yellow-poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera L.) New Phytol. 117: 515–528.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norby, R. J., O'Neill, E. G., Luxmore, R. J. 1986. Effects of atmospheric CO2 enrichment on the growth and mineral nutrition ofQuercus alba seedlings in nutrient poor soil. Plant Physiol. 82: 83–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Project Steering Group (R. Revelleet al.). 1980. Carbon Dioxide Effects Research and Assessment Program (013): Environmental and Societal Consequences of a Possible CO2-Induced Climate Change: A Research Agenda. US Dept of Energy Report DOE/EV/10019-01.

  • Radin, J. W., Kimball, B. A., Hendrix, D. L. & Mauney, J. R. 1987. Photosynthesis of cotton plants exposed to elevated levels of carbon dioxide in the field. Photosynthesis Research 12: 191–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sage, R. F., Sharkey, T. D. & Seeman, J. R. 1989. Acclimation of photosynthesis to elevated CO2 in five C3 species. Plant Physiology 89: 590–596.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strain, B. R. 1978. Report of the Workshop on Anticipated Plant Responses to Global Carbon Dioxide Enrichment, Duke Univ, Durham N. C. (Quail Roost Meeting), 91 pp.

  • Strain, B. R. 1991. SOA Major Findings. Personnel Communication, November, 1991. 3 pp.

  • Strain, B. R. & Cure, J. D., eds. 1985. Direct Effects of Increasing Carbon Dioxide on Vegetation. U. S. Department of Energy Report DOE/ER-0238, 286 pp. This report contains the following chapters:

  • Background on the Response of Vegetation to Atmospheric CO2 Enrichment,B. R. Strain, pp 1–10.

  • Methods of Exposing Plants to Elevated CO2,B. G. Drake, H. H. Rogers, & L. H. Allen Jr., pp 11–32.

  • Modeling Approaches for Evaluating Vegetation Responses to CO2 Concentration,J. F. Reynolds & B. Acock, pp 33–52.

  • Crop Responses to Elevated Carbon Dioxide Concentrations,B. Acock & L. H. Allen Jr., pp 53–98.

  • CO2 Doubling Responses: A Crop Survey,J. D. Cure, pp 99–116.

  • Native Species Responses to Increased CO2,W. Oechel & B. R. Strain, pp 117–154.

  • Effect of Increased Atmospheric CO2 on Plant Communities,F. A. Bazzaz, K. Garbutt, & W. E. Williams, pp 155–170.

  • Global Biospheric Response to Increasing Atmospheric CO2 Concentration,D. M. Gates, pp 171–184.

  • Adaptation of Vegetation and Management Practices to a Higher CO2 World,B. R. Kimball, pp 185–204.

  • Status of Knowledge and Recommendations for Future Work,B. R. Strain & J. D. Cure, pp 205–214.

  • Tans, P. P., Fung, B. R., Takahashi, T. 1990. Observational constraints on the global atmospheric CO2 budget. Science 247: 1431–1438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, R. B. & Strain, B. R. 1991. Root restriction as a factor in photosynthetic acclimation of cotton seedlings grown in elevated CO2. Plant Physiology 96: 627–634.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tissue, D. T. & Oechel, W. C. 1987. Response ofEriophorium vaginatum to elevated CO2 and temperature in the Alaskan tundra. Ecology 68: 401–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trabalka, J. R. (ed) 1985. Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide and the Global Carbon Cycle. DOE/ER-0239. 315 pp.

  • U. S. Dept of Energy. 1980. Workshop on Environmental and Societal Consequences of a Possible CO2-Induced Climate Change. Conf-7904143. pp. 470.

  • Von, Caemmerer, S. & Farquhar, G. D. 1984. Effects of partial defoliation, changes of irradiance during growth, short-term water stress and growth at enhanced CO2 on the photosynthetic capacity of leaves. Planta. 160: 320–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittwer, S. H., Honma, S. 1979. Greenhouse Tomatoes, Lettuce and Cucumbers. Michigan State Univ Press, East Lansing. 225 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziska L. H., Hogan K. P., Smith A. P. & Drake B. G. Growth and photosynthetic response of nine tropical species with long-term exposure to elevated carbon dioxide. Oecologia 86: 383–387.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dahlman, R.C. CO2 and plants: revisited. Vegetatio 104, 339–355 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00048164

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00048164

Keywords

Navigation