Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Relationships of overstory to understory cover variables in a Ponderosa pine/Gambel oak ecosystem

  • Published:
Vegetatio Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many studies have indicated relationships between individual species, but none have related combinations of overstory variables to understory herbaceous vegetation in a Ponderosa pine/Gambel oak ecosystem. Our objective was to determine not only the general relationships between the two sets of variables, but also identify the hyghest contributing variables. We used canonical correlation analysis to relate overstory variables (canopy cover, basal cover and density) to herbaceous vegetation cover variables. Canopy, basal, and ground cover were measured by the line intercept method using a 12.2 m tape as a sample unit. Tree density was measured by the Point-Center-Quarter method. The analysis was made with selected overstory variables and 5 understory herbaceous cover variables. This analysis revealed a significant canonical correlation between the two canonical variables (r=0.69). The analysis showed that among herbaceous cover variables, Oregon grape, Kentucky bluegrass, sedge, and foxtail barley; and among overstory variables, the density and the basal cover of Ponderosa pine indicated the highest positive contribution to the correlation of the two linear combinations while the density and canopy of Gambel oak negatively affected the canonical correlation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Afifi, A. A. & Clark, V. 1084. Computer aided multivariate analysis. Van Nostrand Reinhold company, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, R. R. 1986. Silvicultural systems and cutting methods for Ponderosa pine forests in the Front Range of the Central Rocky Moutains. USDA For. Ser. Gen. Tech. Report, RM-128.

  • Bartel, L. E., Rittenhouse, L. R. & Denham, A. H. 1979. Grazing studies on Gambel oak rangeland at the San Juan Basin Research Center. Colo. State Uni. Exp. Sta., Progress report 10.

  • Baumgartner, D. M. & Lotan, J. E. 1987. Ponderosa pine: the species and its management-symposium proceedings. Wash. State Uni. Spok., Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bidwell, T. G. & Engle, D. M. 1992. The relationship of fire behavior to tallgrass prairie herbage production. J. Range Manage. 45: 579–584.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonham, C. D. 1989. Measurement for terrestrial vegetation John Wiley & Sons.

  • Carey, A. B. 1979. Discriminant analysis: a method of identifying Foci of Vector-borne diseases. Am. J. Trop. Hyg. 28(4): 750–755.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clary, W. P., Kruse, W. H. & Larson, F. R. 1974. Cattle grazing and wood production with different basal areas of Ponderosa pine. J. Range Manage. 28(6): 434–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, C. W. 1960. The use of multiple regression and correlation in biological investigations. Ecol. 41: 556–560.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ffolliott, P. F. 1983. Overstory-understory relationship: southwestern Ponderosa pine forest. USDA For. Ser. Western regional research publication No. 1.

  • Horton, L. E. 1975. An abstract bibliography of Gambel oak (Quercus gambelli Nutt.). USDA For. Ser. Intermountain region. Ogden, Utah.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jameson, D. A. 1967. The relationship of tree overstory and herbaceous understory vegetation. J. Range Manage. 20: 247–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jameson, D. A. & Dodd, J. L. 1969. Herbage production differs with soil in the Pinion-Juniper type of Arizona. USDA For. Ser. Rocky Mount. Exp. Sta. Res. Note RM-131.

  • Lauver, C. L. 1986. Determining optimal management strategies for Gambel oak rangelands with control theory. Ph.D. Dissertation. Colorado State University. Fort Collins, Colorado.

  • Ludwig, J. A. & Reynolds, J. F. 1988. Statistical ecology. A primer on methods and computing. John Wiley & Sons, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, H. G. 1966. Slash cleanup in Ponderosa pine forest affects use by deer and cattle. USDA For. Ser. Rocky Mount. Range Exp. Sta. Res. Note RM-64.

  • SAS Institute Inc. 1988. SAS/STAT user's guide. Release 6.03 Ed. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sassaman, R. W. & Flight, R. D. 1975. A tool for estimating the financial returns of forage grasses seeded in thinned Ponderosa pine. J. Range Manage. 28(2): 185–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, W. W. & Gartner, F. R. 1971. Native forage response to clearing low quality Ponderosa pine. J. Range Manage. 24(4): 272–277.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Rangeland Ecosystem Science Department, Colorado State University, 80523, Fort Collins, Colorado

    Nasser Nemati & Harold Goetz

Authors
  1. Nasser Nemati
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Harold Goetz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nemati, N., Goetz, H. Relationships of overstory to understory cover variables in a Ponderosa pine/Gambel oak ecosystem. Vegetatio 119, 15–21 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00047367

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00047367

Key words

Search

Navigation