Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluating performance of an Appalachian oak forest dynamics model

  • Published:
Vegetatio Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An Appalachian-oak forest in a small montane watershed was sampled to calibrate and test an existing forest dynamics simulation model. Indices developed in earlier studies by Whittaker were used to estimate the response of different tree species to soil moisture. As is the case in many forest modeling applications, neither detailed environmental data at a micro-spatial scale nor quantitative historical stand data were available for the study.

A protocol of both model parameter estimation and simulation output evaluation is developed. The method involves simulation experiments under which the model parameters are allowed to vary systematically with respect to environmental control variables, allowing one to generate a field of potential simulation results that can be searched for patterns shared by the observed data. The degree to which common patterns emerge provides a measure of model sensitivity to patterns at the scale of interest. This protocol can provide an appraisal of the appropriateness of a simulation model to the system of interest and can be used to assess the performance of the model in future applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aber, J.D., Botkin, D.B. & Melillo, J.M. 1978. Predicting the effects of differing harvest regimes on forest floor dynamics in northern hardwoods. Can. J. For. Res. 8: 306–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aber, J.D., Hendry, G.R., Francis, A.J., Botkin, D.B. & Melillo, J.M. 1982. Potential effects of acid precipitation on soil nitrogen and productivity of forest ecosystems. In: F.M., Ditri (ed.). Acid precipitation: Effects on acid precipitation. pp. 411–434. Ann Arbor Science, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, R.G. 1978. Ecoregions of the U.S. U.S.D.A. Forest Service, Odgen, Utah.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergeron, Y., Bouchard, A. & Messicotte, G. 1985. Gradient analysis in assessing differences in community pattern of three adjacent sectors within Abitibi, Quebec. Vegetatio 64: 55–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bormann, F.H. & Likens, G.E. 1979. Pattern and process in a forested ecosystem. Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Botkin, D.B., Janak, J.K. & Wallis, J.R. 1972. Some ecological consequences of a computer model of forest growth. J. Ecol. 60: 849–873.

    Google Scholar 

  • Botkin, D.B., Janak, J.K. & Wallis, J.R. 1972. Some ecological consequences of a computer model of forest growth. J. Ecol. 60: 849–873.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdeau, P. 1954. Oak seedling ecology determining segregation of species in Piedmont Oak-Hickory forests. Ecol. Mon. 24: 297–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callaway, R.M., Clebsch, E.E.C. & White, P.S. 1987. A multivariate analysis of forest communities in the western Great Smoky Mountains National Park. Am. Mid. Nat. 118: 107–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dale, V.H. & Gardner, R. 1987. Assessing regional impacts of growth declines using a forest succession model. J. of Envir. Manage. 24: 83–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dale, V.H., Doyle, T.W. & Shugart, H.H. 1985. A comparison of tree growth models. Ecol. Mod. 24: 145–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • GauchJr, H.G. 1973. The relationship between sample similarity and similarity ecological distance. Ecology 54: 618–622.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grigal, D.F. & Goldstein, R.A. 1971. An integrated ordination-classification analysis of an intensively sampled oak-hickory forest. J. Ecol. 59: 481–492.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hack, J.T. & Goodlett, J.C. 1960. Geomorphology and forest ecology of a mountain region in the central Applachians. U.S. Geol. Surv. Prof. Pap. 347.

  • Harper, J.L. 1977. Population biology of plants. Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, E.A. 1987. A simulation model of forest succession in Shaver Hollow, Shenandoah National Park, Virginia. MSc thesis, Department of Environmental sciences, University of Virginia.

  • Harrison, E.A., McIntyre, W. & Deuser, R.D. 1989. Community dynamics and topographic controls on forest pattern in Shenandoah National Park, Virginia. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 116: 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, G.G. & Ware, S. 1982. Post-chestnut forests in the central Blue Ridge of Virginia. Castanea 47: 329–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kessel, S.R. 1979. Gradient modeling: resource and fire management. Springer-Verlag, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kienast, F. & Kuhn, N. 1989. Simulating forest succession along ecological gradients in southern Central Europe, Vegetatio 78:...-....

  • Leemans, R. & Prentice, I.C. 1987. Description and simulation of tree-layer composition and size distributions in a primaevalPicea-Pinus forest. Vegetatio 69: 147–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legendre, L. & Legendre, P. 1983. Numerical ecology. Elsevier Sci. Publ. Co. Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, E.L. 1971. Atlas of United States trees. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorimer, C.G. 1980. Age structure and disturbance history of a southern Appalachian virgin forest. Ecology 61: 1169–1184.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGee, C.E. 1984. Heavy mortality and succession in a virgin mixed mesophytic forest. USDA Forest Service Southern Forest Experiment Station Research Paper SO-209. 9 pp.

  • McIntyre, A.C. & Schnur, G.L. 1936. Effects of drought on oak forsts. Pennsylvania State College School of Agriculture and Experiment Station. Bull. 325.

  • Monk, C.D. & DayJr, F.P. 1985. Vegetation analysis, primary production and selected nutrient budgets for a southern Appalachian oak forest: A synthesis of IBP studies at Coweeta. For. Ecol. Man. 10: 87–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mowbray, T.B. & Oosting, H.J. 1968. Vegetation gradients in relation to environment and phenology in a southern Blue Ridge gorge. Ecol. Mon.: 309–344.

  • Munro, D.D. 1974. Forest growth models. A prognosis. In: Fries, J. (ed.), Growth models for tree and stand simulation. pp 7–21. Department of Forest Yield Research, Royal College of Forestry, Stockholm. Res. Notes 30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlóci, L. 1975. Multivariate analysis in vegetation research. Junk, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peattic, R. 1936. Mountain geography, Harvard U.P., Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peet, R.K. & Loucks, O.L. 1977. A gradient analysis of southern Wisconsin forests. Ecology 58: 485–499.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phipps, R.L. 1967. Annual growth of suppressed chestnut oak and red maple, a basis for hydrological inference. U.S. Geol. Surv. Prof. Paper 485-C. 27 pp.

  • Phipps, R.L. 1979. Simulation of wetlands forest vegetation dynamics. Ecol. Mod. 7: 257–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, M.S. & Sharik, T.L. 1982. Age-structure relationships of tree species in an Appalachian oak forest in south-western Virginia. Bull. Tor. Bot. Club 109: 287–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • SPSSx user's guide. 1986. SPSS Inc. Chicago.

  • Shanks, R.E. 1954. Climates of the Great Smoky Mountains. Ecology 35: 354–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shugart, H.H. 1984. A theory of forest dynamics. Springer-Verlag. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shugart, H.H. & West, D.C. 1980. Forest succession models. Biocience 30: 308–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shugart, H.H. & Noble, I.R. 1981. A computer model of succession and fire response to the high altitudeEucalyptus forest of the Brindabella Range, Australian Capital Territory. Austr. J. Ecol. 6: 149–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shugart, H.H., Hopkins, M.S., Burgess, I.P. & Mortlock, A.T. 1980. The development of a succession model for subtropical rain forest and its application to assess the effects of timber harvest at Wiangaree State Forest, New South Wales. J. Environ. Manage. 11: 243–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shugart, H.H., Antonovsky, M.Ya., Jarvis, P.G. & Sandford, A.P. 1986. CO2, climatic change and forest ecosystems. In: Bolin, B., Doos, B.R., Jager, J. & Warrick, R.A. (eds), The greenhouse effect, climatic change, and ecosystems, pp. 475–521. John Wiley, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sollins, P., Reichle, D.E. & Olson, J.S. 1973. Organic matter budget and model for the southern AppalachianLiriodendron forest. EDFB/FPB-7312. Oak Ridge National Laboratory. Oak Ridge, Tennessee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, A.M. 1986. Transient response of forests to CO2-induced climate change: simulation modeling experiments in eastern North America. Oecologia 68: 567–579.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson, S.L. 1986. Changes in a former chestnutdominated forest after a half-century of succession. Am. Mid. Nat. 116: 173–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, P.S. & MacKenzie, M.D. 1985. Natural disturbance and gap phase dynamics in southern Appalachian sprucefir forests. Can. J. For. Res. 15: 233–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitney, H.E. & Johnson, W.C. 1984. Ice storms and forest succession in southwestern Virginia. Bull. Torr. Bot. Club. 111: 429–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker, R.H. 1956. Vegetation of the Great Smoky Mountains. Ecol. Mon. 26: 1–80.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Nomenclature: Little, E.B. 1971. Atlas of United States trees. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Harrison, E.A., Shugart, H.H. Evaluating performance of an Appalachian oak forest dynamics model. Vegetatio 86, 1–13 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00045130

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00045130

Keywords

Navigation