Advertisement

Vegetatio

, Volume 74, Issue 2–3, pp 151–159 | Cite as

Tree species regeneration in a mid-elevation, temperate rain forest in Isla de Chiloé, Chile

  • J. J. Armesto
  • E. R. Fuentes
Article

Abstract

The regeneration of canopy and subeanopy species in a mid-elevation, primary rain forest in the Coastal Range of Isla de Chiloé (42°30′S), in the cold-temperate region of Chile, was studied by comparing seedling and sapling abundances under the forest canopy, and within 36 tree-fall gaps. The forest was dominated byAmomyrtus luma andLaurelia philippiana (33 and 32% of the main canopy individuals), and two subcanopy species (Myrceugenia ovata, andMyrceugenia planipes) were also important. Uncommon species in the canopy wereDrimys winteri, Amomyrtus meli, andRaphithamnus spinosus. Tree-fall gaps were created generally by the fall of several trees, and the main canopy species were the principal gap-makers. Gap sizes varied between 28 and 972 m2, with a mean of 197 m2. Seedling and sapling abundances indicate that the dominant species are capable of regenerating below the canopy, but they also germinate and show enhanced growth within small light gaps. For one of the common subcanopy species (M. planipes) and the two infrequent canopy species (D. winteri, andA. meli) regeneration seems to depend entirely on tree-fall gaps. Thus, in this forest, light gaps allow the persistence of infrequent canopy species, but seem less important for the regeneration and maintenance of dominant canopy species.

Key words

Disturbance Dominance Forest dynamics Gap-size Myrtaceae Tree-fall gap 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Armesto, J. J. & Figueroa, J. 1987. Stand structure and dynamics in the rain forests of Chiloé Archipelago. J. Biogeog. 14: 367–376.Google Scholar
  2. Brokaw, N. V. L. 1982. The definition of treefall gap and its effects on measures of forest dynamics Biotropica 14: 158–160.Google Scholar
  3. Brokaw, N. V. L. 1985. Treefalls, regrowth, and community structure in tropical forests. In: Pickett, S. T. A. & White, P. S. (eds), The ecology of natural disturbance and patch dynamics, pp. 53–69. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  4. di, Castri, F. & Hajek, E. R. 1976. Bioclimatología de Chile. Universidad Catolica de Chile, Santiago.Google Scholar
  5. Donoso, C., Grez, R., Escobar, B. & Real, P. 1984. Estructura y dinamica de bosques del tipo forestal siempreverde en un sector de Chiloéd insular. Bosque (Chile) 5: 82–104.Google Scholar
  6. Donoso, C., Escobar, B. & Urrutia, J. 1985. Estructura y estrategias regenerativas de un bosque virgen de Ulmo (Eucryphia cordifolia Cav.). Tepa (Laurelia philippiana Phil.) Looser en Chiloé, Chile. Rev. Chilena Hist. Nat. 58: 171–186.Google Scholar
  7. Hubbell, S. P. & Foster, R. B. 1986. Biology, chance and history and the structure of tropical rain forest tree communities. In: Diamond, J. & Case, T. J. (eds), Community ecology, pp. 314–329. Harper and Row, New York.Google Scholar
  8. Mueller-Dombois, D. & Ellenberg, H. 1974. Aims and methods of vegetation ecology. J. Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  9. Murray, K. G. 1986. Consequences of seed dispersal for gap-dependent plants: relationships between seed shadows germination requirements, and forest dynamic processes. In: Estrada, A. & Fleming, T. H. (eds), Frugivores and seed dispersal, pp. 187–198. Dr W. Junk, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  10. Putz, F. E. 1985. Woody vines and forest management in Malaysia. Commonw. For. Rev. 64: 359–365.Google Scholar
  11. Romme, W. H. & Martin, W. H. 1982. Natural disturbance by tree-falls in old-growth mixed mesophytic forest: Lilley Cornett Woods, Kentucky. In: Muller, R. N. (ed.) Proceedings IV Central Hardwood Forest Conference, pp. 367–383. Univ. of Kentucky, Lexington.Google Scholar
  12. Runkle, J. R. 1982. Patterns of disturbance in some old-growth mesic forests of Eastern. North America Ecology 63: 1533–1546.Google Scholar
  13. Sokal, R. R. & Rohlf, F. J. 1969. Biometry, W. H. Freeman, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  14. Veblen, T. T. 1985a. Stand dynamics in Chilean,Nothofagus forests. In: Pickett, S. T. A. & White, P. S. (eds), The ecology of natural disturbance and patch dynamics, pp. 35–51. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  15. Veblen, T. T. 1985b. Forest development in tree-fall gaps in the temperate rain forests of Chile. Ntl. Geog. Res. 1: 62–183.Google Scholar
  16. Veblen, T. T. & Ashton, D. H. 1978. Catastrophic influences on the vegetation of the Valdivian Andes, Chile, Vegetatio 36: 149–167.Google Scholar
  17. Veblen, T. T., Donoso, C., Schlegel, F. M. & Escobar, B. 1981. Forest dynamics in south-central Chile. J. Biogeog. 8: 211–247.Google Scholar
  18. Villagran, C. 1985. Analisis palinologico de los cambios vegetacionales durante el Tardiglacial y Postglacial en Chiloé, Chile. Rev. Chilena Hist. Nat. 58: 57–69.Google Scholar
  19. White, P. S., MacKenzie, M. D. & Busing, R. T. 1985. A critique on overstorey/understory comparisons based on transition probability analysis of an old growth spurce-fir stand in the Appalachians. Vegetatio 64: 37–45.Google Scholar
  20. Whitmore, T. C. 1982. On pattern and process in forests. In: Newman, E. J. (ed.), The plant community as a working mechanism, pp. 45–57. Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. J. Armesto
    • 1
  • E. R. Fuentes
    • 2
  1. 1.Laboratorio de Sistemática y Ecología Vegetal, Facultad de CienciasUniversidad de ChileSantiagoChile
  2. 2.Laboratorio de Ecologia, Facultad de Ciencias BiológicasUniversidad Catolica de ChileSantiagoChile

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options