Agroforestry Systems

, Volume 35, Issue 3, pp 225–238

Forage production and small ruminant grazing responses in Mediterranean shrublands as influenced by the reduction of shrub cover

  • T. G. Papachristou
  • P. D. Platis
  • V. P. Papanastasis


Reduction of shrub cover in Mediterranean shrublands is considered as a method of optimising forage and animal production. In this study, forage production in grazed and protected plots and grazing responses of small ruminants in cleared (25% shrub cover), slashed (34% shrub cover) and not treated (control, 55% shrub cover) kermes oak (Quercus coccifera L.) shrublands were compared during the spring seasons of 1992, 1993 and 1994. The alterations in shrub density were done in October 1991 and pastures remained ungrazed until spring of 1992. Clearing and slashing of shrub vegetation resulted in higher amounts of available herbaceous forage and useable browse. At the end of the growing season, averaged across years, herbaceous biomass was generally two to three times higher in the treated shrublands than in the control; also, browse biomass was slightly less (1,078 vs 1,533 kg/ha) but easily accessible because of the open structure and the lower height of the sprouting shrubs. There were generally no grazing response differences between the cleared and slashed pastures. However, grazing animals (sheep and goats) had a higher bite rate (bites/min; P ⩽ 0.05) in the treated pastures than in the control. Levels of crude protein in the forage selected by animals were higher (P ⩽ 0.05) in the treated pastures than in the control. Animals in the improved pastures maintained diets that were significantly more digestible (53.5%) than those in the control pasture (48.5%). Neutral detergent fibre and lignin contents of animal diets were similar in the improved pastures but lower (P ⩽ 0.05) than those of the control. It is concluded that removing of woody vegetation in Mediterranean shrublands results in increased forage production (available herbage and useable browse) and improved forage quality and availability for small ruminants.

Key words

goats Greece herbs improvement sheep 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Allison CD (1985) Factors affecting forage intake by range ruminants: a review. J Range Manage 38: 305–311Google Scholar
  2. Altmann J (1974) Observational studies of behaviors: sampling methods. Behavior 49: 225–265Google Scholar
  3. AOAC (1990) Official Methods of Analysis, 15th edition, Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC, 746 ppGoogle Scholar
  4. Bjugstad AJ, Crawford HS and Neal DL (1970) Determining forage consumption by direct observation of domestic animals. In: Range and Wildl Habitat Eval-A Res Symp US Dept Agr Forest Serv Misc Publ No 1147, 220 ppGoogle Scholar
  5. Cook CW (1964) Symposium on nutrition of forages and pastures: collecting forage sample's representative of ingested material of grazing animals for nutritional studies. J Anim Sci 23: 265–270Google Scholar
  6. Cook CW and Stubbendieck J (1986) Range Research:Basic Problems and Techniques. Soc Range Manage, Denver CO, 317 ppGoogle Scholar
  7. Goering HK and Van Soest PJ (1970) Forage Fiber Analyses. ARS, USDA Agr Handb No 379, 20 ppGoogle Scholar
  8. Harris LE (1970) Nutrition Research Techniques for Domestic and Wild Animals. (Vol I). Logan, UT, 182 ppGoogle Scholar
  9. Kirmse RD, Provenza FD and Malechek JC (1987a) Clearcutting Brazilian semiarid tropics: observation on its effects on small ruminant nutrition during the dry season. J Range Manage 40: 428–432Google Scholar
  10. Kirmse RD, Provenza FD and Malechek JC (1987b) Clearcutting Brazilian caatimga: assesment of traditional forest grazing management practice. Agrofor Syst 5: 429–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Le Houérou HN (1983) The role of browse in the management of natural grazing lands, pp 329–338. In: Le Houéruo HN (ed) Browse in Africa, the Current State of Knowledge. International Symposium on Browse in Africa, Addis Ababa, 8–12 April 1980. Intern Livest Centre for Africa, Addis Ababa, EthiopiaGoogle Scholar
  12. Liacos LG (1980) Livestock grazing in Mediterranean forests. In: Incontri Internationali, ‘Probleme Delle Conservazione e Reconstituzone Della Copertura Forestale’. International Meeting Soil, Vegetation, Fauna. Palermo, Italy 6–11 October 1980, 26 ppGoogle Scholar
  13. Liacos LG (1982) Grazing management of evergreen brushlands in Greece, pp 270–275. In: Gen Tech Rep PSW-58. Berkeley, CA: Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Exp Station, Forest Service, US Department of Agriculture ‘Symposium on Dynamics and Management of Mediterranean-type Ecosystems’. June 22–26, 1981, San Diego, CAGoogle Scholar
  14. Liacos LG, Papanastasis VP and Tsiouvaras CN (1980) Contribution to the conversion of kermes oak brushlands to grasslands and comparison of their production with improved brushlands in Greece [in Greek with English abstract]. Dasiki Erevna 1: 97–141Google Scholar
  15. Nastis AS (1982) Nutritive value of oak browse (Quercus coccifera L.) foliage for goats at various phenological stages [in Greek with English abstract]. Dissertation. Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece, 60 ppGoogle Scholar
  16. Papachristou TG (1991) Foraging behaviour estimation of ruminants in rangelands: direct observation of goats grazing in shrublands for determining their dietary and habitat selection. Anim Sci Rev 14: 97–110Google Scholar
  17. Papachristou TG (1996a) Mechanical cleaning of kermes oak brushland: observations on its effects on spring diets of sheep. In: Zervas NP and Hatziminaoglou J (eds) International Symposium on the Optimal Exploitation of Marginal Mediterranean Areas by Extensive Ruminant Production Systems, pp 221–225. Thessaloniki, Greece, June 18–20, 1994. EAAP Publication No. 83Google Scholar
  18. Papachristou TG (1996b) Foraging behaviour of goats and sheep on mediterranean kermes oak shrublands. Small Rumin Res (in press)Google Scholar
  19. Papachristou TG and Nastis AS (1993a) Diets of goats grazing oak shrublands of varying cover in northern Greece. J Range Manage 46: 220–226Google Scholar
  20. Papachristou TG and Nastis AS (1993b) Nutritive value of diet selected by goats grazing on kermes oak shrublands with different shrub and herbage cover in Northern Greece. Small Rumin Res 12: 35–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Papanastasis VP (1988) Evolution of vegetation in a burned kermes oak brushland seeded with range grasses [in Greek with English abstract]. Scientific Annuals, Dept of Forestry and Natural Environment, University of Thessaloniki, 31: 255–275Google Scholar
  22. Papanastasis VP and Liacos LG (1983) Productivity and management of kermes oak brushlands for goats, pp 375–381. In: Le Houéou HN (ed) Browse in Africa, the Current State of Knowledge. International Symposium on Browse in Afric, Addis Ababa, 8–12 April 1980. Intern Livest Centre for Africa, Addis Ababa, EthiopiaGoogle Scholar
  23. Papanastasis VP and Liacos LG (1991) Effectsof kermes oak brushland improvement on vegetation and liveweight gains of goats in Greece. In: Proceedings of the IVth Intern Rangeland Congress, pp 850–853. Montpellier, France. Assoc Francaise de Pastoralism, CIHEAM, Montpellier, FranceGoogle Scholar
  24. Papanastasis VP, Papachristou TG and Platis PD (1991) Control of woody plants with mechanical means in a rangeland of Macedonia, Greece. In: European Grassland Federation, ‘Grassland Renovation and Weed Control in Europe’, pp 203–205Google Scholar
  25. Schacht WH and Malechek JC (1989) Nutrition of goats as influenced by thinning and clearing of deciduous woodland in Northern Brazil. J Anim Sci 67: 2487–2497PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Schacht WH and Malechek JC (1990) Botanical composition of goat diets in thinned and cleared deciduous woodland in northeastern Brazil. J Range Manage 43: 523–529Google Scholar
  27. Short HL, Blair RM and Segelquist CA (1974) Fiber composition and forage digestibility by small ruminants. J Wildl Manage 38: 197–202Google Scholar
  28. Tsiouvaras CN (1987) Ecology and management of kermes oak (Quercus coccifera L.) pastures in Greece: a review. J Range Manage 40: 542–546Google Scholar
  29. Tsiouvaras CN (1988) Long-term effects of clipping on production and vigor of kermes oak (Quercus coccifera). For Ecol Manage 24: 159–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Vallentine JF (1990) Grazing Management. Academic Press, Inc, San Diego, CA, 533 ppGoogle Scholar
  31. Wilson AD (1969) A review of browse in the nutrition of grazing animals. J Range Manage 22: 23–28Google Scholar
  32. Wilson AD, Leight JH, Hindley NL and Mulham WE (1975) Comparison of the diets of goats and sheep on a Causuarina cristata-Heterodendrum oleifolium woodland community in western New South Wales. Austr J Exp Agr Anim Husb 15: 45–53Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. G. Papachristou
    • 1
  • P. D. Platis
    • 1
  • V. P. Papanastasis
    • 2
  1. 1.Range Management Laboratory, Forest Research InstituteNational Agricultural Research FoundationVassilikaGreece
  2. 2.Range and Wildlife Sci., Depart.(236)Aristotle UniversityThessalonikiGreece

Personalised recommendations