Skip to main content
Log in

Studies on genetic divergence in potato

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Sixty-seven potato varieties/hybrids were grouped in 15 clusters on the basis of D2 values. The clustering pattern was not influenced by the geographic diversity of the varieties. However, a segregation between varieties of the Tuberosum and Andigena type varieties was observed. The exotic potato varieties and also the Indian varieties bred from Tuberosums showed a poor divergence. In contrast, the divergence in the varieties developed from Tuberosum-Andigena crosses was much greater. The inter-cluster distance of such varieties, with respect to Tuberosum and Andigena clusters, appeared to be influenced by the cytoplasm they carried. The varieties with Tuberosum cytoplasm were closer to clusters having Tuberosum varieties and those with Andigena cytoplasm were closer to clusters having Andigena type varieties. The characters least influenced by the selection during the course of evolution of the present day varieties were found to be mainly responsible for adding divergence to the population. A breeding plan involving varieties from different clusters has been outlined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Cubillos, A. G. & R. L., Plaisted, 1976. Heterosis for yield in hybrids between S. tuberosum ssp. tuberosum and S. tuberosum ssp. andigena. Am. Potato J. 53: 143–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fonseca, S. & F. L., Patterson, 1968. Hybrid vigour in a seven parent diallel cross in common winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Crop Sci. 8: 85–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glendinning, D. R., 1969. The performance of progenies obtained by crossing groups Andigena and Tuberosum of Sclanum tuberosum. Eur. Potato J. 12: 13–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glendinning, D. R., 1975. Neo-tuberosum; new potato breeding material. 1. The origin, composition, and development of the Tuberosum and Neo-tuberosum gene pools. Potato Res. 18: 256–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanes, C. S., 1929. An application of the method of Hagedorn and Jensen to the determination of larger quantities of reducing sugars. Biochem. J. 33: 99–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hougas, R. W. & R. W., Ross, 1956. The use of foreign introductions in breeding American potato varieties. Am. Potato J. 33: 328–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, H. W., 1963. Some potato breeding problems. Rep. Pl. Breed. Inst. 1961–62. Cambridge, England, pp. 5–21.

  • Mahalanobis, P. C., 1936. On the generalized distance in statistics. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. India 2: 49–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marani, A., 1963. Heterosis and combining ability for yield and components of yield in a diallel cross of two species of cotton. Crop Sci. 3: 552–555.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marani, A., 1968. Heterosis and inheritance of quantitative characters in interspecific crosses of cotton. Crop Sci. 8: 299–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marani, A. & E., Avieli, 1973. Heterosis during the early phases of growth in intraspecific and interspecific crosses of cotton. Crop Sci. 13: 15–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murty, B. R., 1965. Heterosis and combining ability in relation to genetic divergence in flue-cured tobacco. Indian J. Genet. Pl. Breed. 25: 46–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murty, B. R. & I. J., Anand, 1966. Combining ability and genetic divergence in some varieties of Linum usitattissimum. Indian J. Genet. Pl. Breed. 26: 21–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paxman, G. J., 1966. Heterosis in Andigena hybrids. Rep. John Innes Inst. 1965, pp. 51–53.

  • Rao, C. R., 1952. Advanced statistical methods in biometrical research. John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp. 357–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, H., 1958. Kartoffel II Ausgangsmaterial für die Züchtung. In: H., Kappert & W., Rudorf (Eds) 1958. Handbuch der Pflanzenzüchtung. III. 2nd ed. Paul Parey, Berlin, Germany. pp. 43–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmonds, N. W., 1962. Variability in crop plants its use and conservation. Biol. Rev. 37: 422–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sriwatanapongse, S. & C. P., Wilsie, 1968. Intra and inter variety crosses of Medicaga sativa L. and Medicago falcata L. Crop Sci. 8: 465–466.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swaminathan, M. S., 1958. The origin of the early European potato-evidence from Indian varieties. Indian J. Genet. Pl. Breed. 18: 8–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swaminathan, K., K. C., Sud & H., Kishore, 1973. Rapid photometric method for the determination of ‘True’ protein content of potatoes based on non-selective dye-binding capacity. Indian J. Exp. Biol. 11: 63–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarn, T. R., 1975. The use of primitive cultivated species in potato breeding. Am. Potato J. 52: 278–279 (Abstr.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarn, T. R. & G. C. C., Tai, 1973. Heterosis in F2 hybrids between group Andigena and group Tuberosum potatoes. Am. Potato J. 50: 337 (Abstr.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Timothy, D. H., 1963. Genetic diversity, heterosis and the use of exotic stocks in maize in Columbla. Statistical Genetics and Plant Breeding Symposium, Raleigh, 1961, pp. 581–591.

  • Van der, Plank, J. E., 1946. Origin of the first European potatoes and their reaction to length of day. Nature (Lond.) 157: 503–505.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gaur, P.C., Gupta, P.K. & Kishore, H. Studies on genetic divergence in potato. Euphytica 27, 361–368 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00043160

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00043160

Index words

Navigation