Skip to main content

Status assessment in acid-sensitive and non-acid-sensitive Maryland coastal planin streams using an integrated biological, chemical, physical, and land-use approach

Abstract

This study was designed to: (1) evaluate the ecological status of acid-sensitive and non acid-sensitive Maryland coastal plain streams using biological (Index of biotic Integrity [IBI] for fish), chemical and physical habitat conditions; (2) determine if a low IBI for coastal plain stream fish can be related to stream sensitivity from acidic inputs and (3) correlate land use activities and watershed size in the coastal plain streams with biological, chemical and physical conditions. IBI values obtained using 12 community metrics for Maryland coastal plain stream fish demonstrated that there were no significant differences in these values when acid-sensitive and non-acid-sensitive streams were compared. However, other complementary data in acid-sensitive streams such as absence of the acid-sensitive species, blacknose dace and higher numbers and biomass of tolerant species suggested that these streams may be impacted. IBI values were also found to be negatively correlated with various trace metals in acid-sensitive streams but not in non-acid-sensitive areas. Chemical conditions such as trace metals and nutrients were associated with land use activities. Highest concentrations of trace metals (chromium, nickel, and cadmium) were found in streams with the highest percentage of low residential housing. Nitrate concentrations were significantly higher in streams found in agricultural areas than in forested areas. Agriculturally dominated streams with highest nitrate concentrations (> 10 mg l-1) also contained the highest percentage of livestock feeding operations. The mean IBI score for streams draining agricultural land was higher than the mean value for forested streams when all streams were compared. However, when several streams that were only marginally forested (< 50%) were removed from the analysis, the IBI scores did not differ significantly by land use. Two physical habitat indices exhibited a strong associated with each other. Each habitat index also correlated with IBI values.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Angermeier, P. L. & J. R. Karr, 1986. Applying an index of biotic integrity based on stream-fish community considerations in sampling and interpretation. N. Amer. J. Fish. Manag. 6: 418–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • APHA et al., 1985. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. Amer. Public Health Assoc., Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, J. P. & S. W. Christensen, 1991. Effects of acidification on biological communities in aquatic ecosystems. In: D. F. Charles (ed.), Acidic Deposition and Aquatic Ecosystems. pp. 83–106. Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, J. P., D. P. Bernard, S. W. Christensen, M. J. Sale, J. Freda, K. Heltcher, D. Maromorek, L. Rowe, P. Scanlon, G. Suter, W. Warren-Hicks & P. Welbourn, 1990. Biological Effects of Changes in Surface Water Acid-Base Chemistry. NAPAP Report 13. In: National Acid Precipitation Assessment Program, Acidic Deposition: State of Science and Technology. Vol. II, Washington, DC.

  • Balon, E. K., 1975. Reproductive guilds of fishes: a proposal and definition. J. Fish. Res. Broad Can. 32: 821–864.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkman, H. E. & C. F. Rabeni, 1987. Effect of siltation on stream fish communities. Environ. Biol. Fishes 18: 285–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, E. L., 1983. Fishes of Pennsylvania and the Northeastern United States. Penn. State Univ. Press, University Park, Pennsylvania, 243 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, W. S. & T. P. Simmons, 1989. Proceedings of the 1989 Midwest Pollution Control biologists Meeting. U.S. Environ. Protect. Agency, EPA-905/9-89-007.

  • Dickson, K. L., W. T. Waller, J. H. Kennedy & L. P. Ammann, 1992. Assessing the relationship between ambient toxicity and instream biological response. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 11: 1307–1322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Draper, N. R. & H. Smith, 1981. Applied Regression Analysis, 2nd edn. John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York, 709 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eddy, S. & J. C. Underhill, 1978. How to know the freshwater fishes. 3rd edn. W.C. Brown Comp. Publishers, Dubuque, Iowa, 215 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, S. A., L. W. Hall, Jr., W. D. Killen, Jr., M. C. Ziegenfuss, R. D. Anderson & R. J. Klauda, 1992a. Concurrent fish community metric, physical and chemical approaches for assessing environmental degradation in Maryland coastal plain streams. In: R.E. Stroud (ed.), Fisheries Management and Watershed Development AFS Symposium 13. p. 270. Bethesda, Maryland.

  • Fischer, S. A., L. W. HallJr. & W. D. KillenJr., 1992b. Distribution of the endangered glassy darter, Etheostoma vitreum, in Maryland coastal plain streams. Virg. J. Sci. 43: 47–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gammon, J. R., 1976. The fish populations of the middle 340 km of the Wabash River. Purdue Univ. Water Resources Res. Center, Tech. Rep. 86, West Lafayette, IN.

  • Gammon, J. R., 1980. The use of community parameters derived from electrofishing catches of river fish as indicators of environmental quality. In: Seminar on Water Quality Management Trade-offs. U.S. Environ. Prot. Agency, EPA-905/9-80-009: 335–363.

  • Gorman, O. T. & J. R. Karr, 1978. Habitat structure and stream fish communities. Ecology 59: 507–515.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greening, H. S., A. J. Janicki & W. P. Saunders, 1987. An evaluation of stream liming effects on water quality and yellow perch spawning in Maryland coastal plain streams: 1986 Final Report. Internat. Sci. Technol. Inc, Reston, Virginia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greening, H. S., A. J. Janicki, R. J. Klauda, D. M. Boulder, D. M. Levin & E. S. Perry, 1989. An evaluation of stream liming effects on water quality and spawning of migratory fishes in Maryland coastal plain streams: 1988 results. Maryland Dep. Natur. Resources, Chesapeake Bay Res. Monit. Div., final Rep. AD-89-5.

  • Greer, J., 1991. Shaping the watershed: How should we manage growth. Watershed Summer/Spring: 2–14.

  • Hall, L. W.Jr., S. A. Fischer, W. D. KillenJr., M. C. Ziegenfuss & R. D. Anderson, 1992. 1991 Doser Study in Maryland coastal plain: Use of lime doser to mitigate stream acidification. Maryland Dep. Natur. Resources, Chesapeake Bay Res. Monit. Div., Annapolis, Maryland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henshaw, J. M., T. E. Lewis & E. M. Heithman (in press). A semi-automatic calorimetric method for the determination of monomeric aluminum species in natural waters by flow injection analysis. Internat. J. Environ. Anal. Chem.

  • Hillman, D. C., S. H. Pia & J. J. Simon, 1986. Analytical methods manual for the National Surface Water Stream Survey (Middle Atlantic Phase I, Southeast Screening and Middle Atlantic Episode Pilot). Lockheed Engin. Managem. Serv. Co., Inc., Las Vegas, Nevada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, R. M. & J. R. Gammon, 1987. Longitudinal changes in fish assemblages and water quality in the Willamette River, Oregon. Trans. Amer. Fish Soc. 116: 196–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • IST (International Science and Technology, Inc.), 1988. Maryland Synoptic Stream Chemistry Survey: Estimating the number and distribution of streams affected by or at risk from acidification. Maryland Power Plant Research Program, Rep. AD-88-2.

  • Jacobson, R., P. Kazyak, A. Janicki, D. Wade, H. Wilson & R. P. Morgan, 1992. Feasibility of using an index of biotic integrity (IBI) approach for synthesizing data from a Maryland biological stream survey. Rep. prep. by Versar Inc., Columbia, Maryland.

  • Janicki, A. J. & H. S. Greening, 1988. An evaluation of stream liming effects on water quality and anadromous fish spawning in Maryland coastal plain streams: 1987 results. Rep. Internat. Sci. Technol. Inc., Reston, Virginia.

  • Karr, J. R., 1981. Assessment of biotic integrity using fish communities. Fisheries 6: 21–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karr, J. R., 1991. Biological integrity; A long-neglected aspect of water resource management. Ecol. Appl. 1: 66–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karr, J. R., K. D. Fausch, P. L. Angermeier, P. R. Yant & I. J. Schlosser, 1987. Assessing biological integrity in running waters: a method and its rationale. Illinois Natur. Hist. Surv., Spec. Pub. 5.

  • Klauda, R. J., 1989. Definitions of critical environmental conditions for selected Chesapeake Bay finfish exposed to acidic episodes in spawning and nursery habitats. Maryland Dep. Natur. Resources, Chesapeake Bay Res. Monit. Div., Acid Deposition Program, Rep. CBRM AD-89-6.

  • Klauda, R. J., S. A. Fischer, L. W. HallJr. & J. A. Sullivan, 1991. Alewife and Blueback Herring. In: S. L. Funderburk, J. A. Mihursky, S. J. Jordan & D. Riley (eds), Habitat Requirements for Chesapeake Bay Living Resources, 2nd edn. pp. 10.1–10.29, Chesapeake Research Consortium Inc., Solomons, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, J. R., 1984. Modified gram analysis for acid and based titrations. Environ. Geochem. Rep. 1984–2.

  • Lee, D. S., A. Norden, C. R. Gilbert & R. Franz, 1976. A list of the freshwater fishes of Maryland and Delaware. Chesapeake Sci. 17: 205–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, D. S., C. R. Gilbert, C. H. Hocutt, R. E. Jenkins, D. E. McAllister & J. R. StaufferJr., 1980. Atlas of North American freshwater fishes. North Caroline State Mus. Natur. Hist., Raleigh, North Carolina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahon, R., 1980. Accuracy of catch-effort methods for estimating fish density and biomass in streams. Environ. Biol. Fishes 5: 343–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Majumdar, S. K., L. W. HallJr. & H. M. Austin, 1987. Contaminant Problems and Management of Living Chesapeake Bay Resources, Pennsylvania Acad. Sci., Easton, Pennsylvania. 573 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maryland Office of Planning, 1991. Maryland's Land 1973–1990 A Changing Resource. Off. State Planning, Baltimore, Maryland. Pub. 91–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. L., P. M. Leonard, R. Hughes, J. R. Karr, P. B. Moyle, L. H. Schrader, B. A. Thompson, R. A. Daniels, K. D. Fausch, G. A. Fitzhugh, J. R. Gannon, D. B. Halliwell, P. L. Angermeier & D. J. Orth, 1988. Regional Applications of an index of biotic integrity for use in water resource management. Fisheries 13: 12–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milliken, G. A. & D. Johnson, 1984. Analysis of Messy Data. Volume 1: Designed Experiments. Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., New York, 473 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, T. J. & S. Swanson, 1991. Aquatic habitat condition index, stream type and livestock bank drainage in northern Nevada. Water Res. Bull. 27: 667–676.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oberdorff, T. & R. M. Hughes, 1992. Modification of an index of biotic integrity based on fish assemblages to characterize rivers of the Seine River, France. Hydrobiologia 228: 117–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (Orangization for Economic Cooperation and Development), 1986. Water Pollution by Fertilizers and Pesticides. Paris, France.

  • OEPA (Ohio Environmental Protection Agency), 1987. Biological criteria for the protection of aquatic life: Volume II: users manual for biological field assessment of Ohio surface water. Div. Water Qual. Monit. Assess. Surface Water Sect., Columbus, Ohio.

    Google Scholar 

  • OEPA, 1989. The qualitative habitat evaluation index (QHEI): rationale, methods and application. Div. Water Qual. Monit. Assess., Surface Water Sect., Columbus, Ohio.

    Google Scholar 

  • Page, L. M., 1983. Handbook of darters. TFH Publications, Inc., Neptune City, NJ. 271 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T. R., Y. Maita & C. M. Lalli, 1984. A Manual of Chemical and Biological Methods for Sea Water Analysis. Pergamon Press, New York. 174 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plafkin, J. L., M. T. Barbour, K. D. Porter, S. K. Gross & R. M. Hughes, 1989. Rapid bioassessment protocols for use in streams and rivers: Benthic macroinvertebrates and fish. U.S. Environ. Protect. Agency, EPA/440/4-89/001.

  • Scott, D. & T. Hall, 1991. Comparative analysis of agricultural land use practices on two similar size Choptank River watersheds. Rep. U.S. Fish Wildl. Serv., Chesapeake Estuary Program, Annapolis, Maryland.

  • Smith, P. W., 1979. The fishes of Illinois. Univ. Ill. Press, Urbana. Illinois. 314 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Speir, H. J., D. R. Weinrich & W. R. Carter, III, 1976. Evaluation of the effects of channelization on small Coastal Plain streams of Maryland. Rep. to U.S. Fish Wildl. Serv., Maryland Dep. Natur. Resources, Rep. F-24-R, Annapolis, Maryland.

  • Steedman, R. J., 1988. Modification and assessment of an index of biotic integrity to quantify stream quality in Southern California. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 45: 492–501.

    Google Scholar 

  • USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency), 1979. Methods for chemical analysis of water and wastes. EPA-600/4-79-020.

  • USEPA, 1987. Water quality criteria summary. Off. Water Regulations and Standards. Criteria and Standards Div.

  • USEPA, 1991. Chesapeake Bay Toxics of Concern List. Report prepared by the Chesapeake Bay Program Toxics Subcommittee's by the Chesapeake Bay Program Toxics Subcommittee's Living Resources Subcommittee's Joint Criteria and Standards Workgroup, Annapolis, Maryland.

  • Vannote, R. L., G. W. Minshall, K. W. Cummins, J. R. Sedell & C. E. Cushing, 1980. The River continuum concept. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 37: 130–137.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hall, L.W., Fischer, S.A., Killen, W.D. et al. Status assessment in acid-sensitive and non-acid-sensitive Maryland coastal planin streams using an integrated biological, chemical, physical, and land-use approach. J Aquat Ecosyst Stress Recov 3, 145–167 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00042944

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00042944

Key words

  • acidification
  • Index of Biotic Integrity
  • physical habitat
  • fish