Skip to main content
Log in

Inter-plot competition in yield trials of swedes (Brassica napus ssp. rapifera L.)

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Two experiments were done to evaluate the use of single-row plots for assessing dry-matter yield of swedes. In the first experiment the correlation between the dry-matter yields of 20 cultivars in unguarded single-row plots and those in guarded double-row plots was poor (r=0.39). It was improved (r=0.58) by adjusting the single-row plot fresh-weight yields for inter-plot competition, through an analysis of covariance in which the covariate was the mean of the adjacent plot yields, and then estimating the pure stand dry-matter yields. However, the correlation was still lower than that between unguarded double-row plots and the guarded double-row plots (r=0.73), and this latter correlation was also improved (r=0.82) by adjusting the fresh-weight yields of the unguarded plots for inter-plot competition.

The second experiment provided an explanation for the partial success of the covariance adjustment. The individual neighbour effects of six cultivars were determined. Doon Major and Ruta Øtofte decreased the yields of adjacent cultivars whereas Dryden and Melfort increased them. Angela and Magres had little effect. The correlation between the dry-matter yield neighbour effects of cultivars and their fresh-weight yields was high (r=−0.81), but not complete. So although competitive ability was associated with root fresh-weight yield, other factors must also be involved.

It was concluded that a two-replicate trial with unguarded double-row plots is preferable to a four-replicate trial with unguarded single-row plots for dry-matter yield assessment of early generation families in a pedigree swede breeding programme.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bradshaw J.E., 1986. Competition between cultivars of fodder kale (Brassica oleracea L.) in yield trials with single-row plots. Euphytica 35: 433–439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen N.F. & W.T. Federer, 1964. Adjacent row competition in wheat. Crop Sci. 4: 641–645.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kawano K., A. Amaya, P. Daza & M. Rios, 1978. Factors affecting efficiency of hybridization and selection in cassava. Crop Sci. 18: 373–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kempton R.A. 1982. Adjustment for competition between varieties in plant breeding trials. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 98: 599–611.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kempton R.A., 1984. The design and analysis of unreplicated field trials. Vortr. Pflanzenzüchtg. 7: 219–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kempton R.A., 1985. Statistical models for interplot competition. Aspects of Applied Biology 10: 111–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kempton R.A. & G. Lockwood, 1984. Inter-plot competition in variety trials of field beans (Vicia faba L.). J. agric. Sci., Camb. 103: 293–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimber D.S. 1977. Variety testing for National and Recommended Lists in England and Wales. Journal of the National Institute of Agricultural Botany 14: 306–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer Th., J.W.van Ooijen & C.J.T. Spitters, 1982. Selection for yield in small plots of spring wheat. Euphytica 31: 549–564.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Clerg E.L., 1966. Significance of experimental design in plant breeding. In K.J. Frey (Ed.), Plant Breeding. The Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa, pp. 243–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmonds N.W., 1979. Principles of crop improvement. Longman, London and New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bradshaw, J.E. Inter-plot competition in yield trials of swedes (Brassica napus ssp. rapifera L.). Euphytica 42, 135–140 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00042624

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00042624

Key words

Navigation