Plant Molecular Biology

, Volume 23, Issue 6, pp 1223–1232 | Cite as

Identification and characterization of a proline-rich mRNA that accumulates during pod development in oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.)

  • Simon A. Coupe
  • Jane E. Taylor
  • Peter G. Isaac
  • Jeremy A. Roberts
Research Article


Pod development in oilseed rape (Brassica napus) culminates in a process known as dehiscence (shatter) which can result in the loss of seed before the crop is harvested. In order to investigate the biochemical and the genetic basis controlling this process, a cDNA library was constructed from the dehiscence zone of developing pods. This resulted in the isolation of a cDNA clone (SAC51). The mRNA encoded by SAC51 had a transcript size of ca. 700 nucleotides and was found, by northern analysis, to accumulate preferentially in the dehiscence zone of the pod and in no other part of the plant analysed. The predicted polypeptide is rich in the amino acids proline (14.2%) and leucine (14.2%). The sequence of the polypeptide has more than 40% amino acid sequence identity with polypeptides isolated from carrot embryos, maize roots, soybean seeds and young tomato fruit. The function of these proteins is unknown. Genomic Southern analysis suggests that SAC51 is encoded by a single gene or small gene family. The role of the peptide in the development of pods of oilseed rape is discussed.

Key words

abscission dehiscence pod proline-rich shatter 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Agnihotri, A, Shivanna, KR, Raina, SN, Lakshmikumaran, M, Prakash, S, Jagannathan, V: Production of Brassica napus × Raphanobrassica hybrids by embryo rescue: an attempt to introduce shattering resistance into B. napus. Plant Breed 105: 292–299 (1990).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aleith, F, Richter, G: Gene expression during induction of somatic embryogenesis in carrot cell suspensions. Planta 183: 17–24 (1990).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cassab, GI, Varner, JE: Cell wall proteins. Annu Rev Plant Pysiol Plant Mol Biol 39: 321–353 (1988).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chen, J, Varner, JE: Isolation and characterization of cDNA clones for carrot extensin and a proline-rich 33 kDa protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 82: 4399–4403 (1985).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chen, CG, Mau, SL, Clarke, AE: Nucleotide sequence and style-specific expression of a novel proline-rich gene from Nicotiana alata. Plant Mol Biol 21: 391–395 (1993).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cheung, AY, May, B, Kawata, EE, Gu, Q, Wu, H: Characterization of cDNAs for stylar transmitting tissue-specific proline-rich proteins in tobacco. Plant J 3: 151–160 (1993).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Christoffersen, RE, Laties, GC: Ethylene regulation of gene expression in carrots. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 79: 4060–4063 (1982).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Clarke, BC, Moran, LB, Appels, R: DNA analysis in wheat breeding. Genome 32: 334–339 (1989).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Condit, CM, Meagher, RB: A gene encoding a novel glycine-rich structural protein of petunia. Nature 323: 178–181 (1986).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dean, C, van denElzen, P, Tamaki, S, Dunsmuir, P, Bedbrook, J: Differential expression of the eight genes of the petunia ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase small subunit multi-gene family. EMBO J 4: 3055–3061 (1985).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Devereux, J, Haeberli, P, Smithies, O: A comprehensive set of sequence analysis programs for the VAX. Nucl Acids Res 12: 387–395 (1984).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Estanyol, JM, Avila, RL, Puigdomenech, P: A maize embryo-specific gene encodes a proline-rich and hydrophobic protein. Plant Cell 4: 413–423 (1992).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    vonHeijne, G: A new method for predicting signal sequence cleavage sites. Nucl Acids Res 14: 4683–4690 (1986).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hong, JC, Nagao, RT, Key, JL: Developmentally regulated expression of soybean proline-rich cell protein genes. Plant Cell 1: 937–943 (1989).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    John, I, Wang, H, Held, BM, Wurtele, ES, Colbert, JT: An mRNA that specifically accumulates in maize roots delineates a novel subset of developing cortical cells. Plant Mol Biol 20: 821–831 (1992).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Joshi, CP: Putative polyadenylation signals in nuclear genes of higher plants: a compilation and analysis. Nucl Acids Res 15: 9627–9640 (1987).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kadkol, GP, Halloran, GM, MacMillan, RH: Inheritance of silqua strength in Brassica campestris L. I. Studies of F2 and backcross populations. Can J Genet Cytol 28: 365–373 (1986).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kornfield, R, Kornfield, S: Assembly of asparagine-linked oligosaccharides. Annu Rev Biochem 54: 631–664 (1985).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kyte, J, Doolittle, RF: A simple method for displaying the hydropathic character of a protein. J Mol Biol 157: 105–132 (1982).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Macleod, J: Harvesting. In: Oilseed Rape Book. Cambridge Agricultural Publishing, Cambridge (1981).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Marck, C. ‘DNA Strider’: a ‘C’ program for the fast analysis of DNA and protein sequences on the Apple Macintosh family of computers. Nucl Acids Res 16: 1829–1836 (1988).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Meakin PJ: The physiology of bud abscission and pod shatter in oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.). Ph. D. thesis, University of Nottingham, UK (1988).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Meakin, PJ, Roberts, JA: Dehiscence of fruit in oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.). I. Anatomy of pod dehiscence. J Exp Bot 41: 995–1002 (1990).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Meakin, PJ, Roberts, JA: Dehiscence of fruit in oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.). II. The role of cell wall degrading enzymes and ethylene. J Exp Bot 41: 1003–1011 (1990).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Odani, S, Koide, T, Ono, T, Seto, Y, Tanaka, T: Soybean hydrophobic protein. Isolation, partial characterization and the complete primary structure. Eur J Biochem 162: 485–491 (1987).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Picton SJ, Gray JE, Barton SL, AbuBakar U, Lowe A, Grierson DG: cDNA cloning and characterization of novel ripening related mRNAs with altered patterns of accumulation in the ripening inhibitor (rin) tomato ripening mutant. Plant Mol Biol, in press (1993).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Prakash, S, Chopra, VL: Reconstruction of allopolyploid Brassicas through non-homologous recombination: introgression of resistance to pod shatter in Brassica napus. Genet Res Camb 56: 1–2 (1990).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Roberts, MR, Foster, GD, Blundell, RP, Robinson, SW, Kumar, A, Draper, J, Scott, R: Gametophytic and sporophytic expression of an anther-specific Arabidopsis thaliana gene. Plant J 3: 111–120 (1993).Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Salts, Y, Wachs, R, Gruissem, W, Barg, R: Sequence coding for a novel proline-rich protein preferentially expressed in young tomato fruit. Plant Mol Biol 17: 149–150 (1991).Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sambrook, J, Fritsch, EF, Maniatis, T: Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY (1989).Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sanger, F, Nicklen, S, Coulson, AR: DNA sequencing with chain terminating inhibitors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 74: 5463–5467 (1977).Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Saul, DJ, Williams, LC, Grayling, RA, Chamley, LW, Love, DR, Berquist, PL: Cel B: a gene coding for a bifunctional cellulase from the extreme thermophile Caldocellum saccharolyticum. Appl Envir Microbiol 56: 3117–3124 (1990).Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Sexton, R, Roberts, JA: Cell biology of abscission. Annu Rev Plant Physiol 33: 133–162 (1982).Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Sheng, J, Jeong, J, Mehdy, MC: Developmental regulation and phytochrome mediated induction of mRNAs encoding a proline-rich protein, glycine-rich proteins and hydroxyproline-rich glycoproteins in Phaseolus vulgaris L. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90: 828–832 (1993).Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Short, JM, Fernandez, JM, Sorge, JA, Huse, WD: λZAP: a bacteriophage λ expression vector in with in vivo excision properties. Nucl Acids Res 16: 7583–7600 (1988).Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Stacey, J, Isaac, PG: Restriction enzyme digestion, gel electrophoresis and vacuum blotting of DNA to nylon membranes. In: Isaac, PG (ed) Methods in Molecular Biology Protocols for Nucleic Acid Analysis by Non-radioactive Probes, vol. 20. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ, in press (1993).Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Taylor, JE, Tucker, GA, Lasslett, Y, Smith, CJS, Arnold, CM, Watson, CF, Schuch, W, Grierson, D, Roberts, JA: Polygalacturonase expression during leaf abscission of normal and transgenic tomato plants. Planta 183: 133–138 (1990).Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Taylor, JE, Webb, STJ, Coupe, SA, Tucker, GA, Roberts, JA: Changes in polygalacturonase activity and solubility of polyuronides during ethylene stimulated leaf abscission in Sambucus nigra. J Exp Bot 44: 93–98 (1993).Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    U N: Genomic analysis of Brassica with special reference to the experimental formation of B. napus and its peculiar mode of fertilization. Jpn J Bot 7: 389–452 (1935).Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Webb, STJ, Taylor, JE, Coupe, SA, Ferrarese, L, Roberts, JA: Purification of β1.4 glucanase from ethylene-treated abscission zones of Sambucus nigra. Plant Cell Environ 16: 329–333 (1993).Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Wright, SY, Sumer, MM, Bell, PJ, Vandim, M, Greenland, AJ: Isolation and characterization of male flower cDNAs from maize. Plant J 3: 41–49 (1993).Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Wyatt, RE, Nagao, RT, Key, JL: Patterns of soybean proline-rich proteins gene expression. Plant Cell 4: 99–110 (1992).Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Zheng-Hua, Y, Varner, JE: Tissue specific expression of cell wall proteins in developing soybean tissues. Plant Cell 3: 23–37 (1991).Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Zhou, J, Rumeau, D, Showalter, AM: Isolation and characterization of two wound-regulated tomato extensin genes. Plant Mol Biol 20: 5–17 (1992).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Simon A. Coupe
    • 1
  • Jane E. Taylor
    • 1
  • Peter G. Isaac
    • 2
  • Jeremy A. Roberts
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Physiology and Environmental Science, Faculty of Agriculture and Food SciencesUniversity of NottinghamLoughboroughUK
  2. 2.Cambridge Science ParkNickerson Biocem Ltd.CambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations