Abstract
Fidelity is the most fundamental notion of the Braun-Blanquet school of phytocoenology. It can be applied to all non-phenotypic taxa and to all syntaxa irrespective of their rank. This holds both for faithful and for differential taxa. In the latter case the range of syntaxa within which the taxon is differential should also be indicated.
Not only taxa, but also their growth-form and microhabitat may be characteristic for a given syntaxon. A new concept: ‘elementary coenological unit’ (ECU) is therefore introduced for a taxon-growth-form-microhabitat combination. Fidelity of ECU's is restricted both in space and in time. Various cases as well as the causes of this limitation are discussed.
The criteria for fidelity are discussed, including abundance, cover degree, vitality, fertility and constancy (presence degree). It is demonstrated that these parameters by no means show parallel variation. Their biological significance is discussed. It is proposed to ignore the occurrence of species with reduced vitality and to base fidelity degrees on the thus modified total cover value TC' (scale Barkman, Doing & Segal, transformation values by Van der Maarel) in a given syntaxon divided by its TC' in the syntaxon with the most similar TC' value (TC' ratio).
The well-known scale of fidelity degrees by Szafer & Pawłowski is criticized and a new scale is proposed, which is equally quinquepartite, but has only two classes of fidelity. It also has two classes of infidelity and one class of indifferent species. The threshold values between these classes are proposed to be fixed at the TC' ratios 5, 2, 0,5 and 0,2.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- ECU =:
-
Elementary coenological unit
References
Barkman J. J. 1958. Phytosociology and ecology of cryptogamic epiphytes, Van Gorcum, Assen.
Barkman J. J. 1979. The investigation of vegetation texture and structure. In: Werger M. J. A. (ed.), The study of vegetation, pp. 125–160. Junk, The Hague-Boston-London.
Barkman J. J., Doing H., vanLeeuwen C. G. & Westhoff V. 1958. Some remarks on terminology in vegetation science (in Dutch). Corr. Bl. Rijksherbarium 8: 87–93.
Barkman J. J., Doing H. & Segal S. 1964. Kritische Bemerkungen und Vorschläge zur quantitativen Vegetationsanalyse. Acta Bot. Neerl. 13: 394–419.
Becking, R. W. 1954. Site indicators and forest types of the Douglas fir region of western Washington and Oregon. Ph. D. thesis, University of Washington (unpubl.).
Becking R. W. 1957. The Zürich-Montpellier school of phytosociology. Bot. Rev. 23: 411–488.
Becking, R. W. 1961. Mathematical analysis of plant communities. Qualitative evaluation of phytosociological data. Rec. Adv. Bot. Univ. of Toronto Press: 1346–1350.
Braun-Blanquet J. 1925. Zur Wertung der Gesellschaft-streue in der Pflanzensoziologie. Vierteljahrsschr. Naturf. Ges. Zürich, 70: 122–149.
Braun-Blanquet, J. 1928. Pflanzensoziologie 1st ed. Berlin.
Braun-Blanquet, J. 1932. Plant sociology. New York. Reprint 1966.
Braun-Blanquet J. 1951. Pflanzensoziologie. 2nd. ed. Springer, Wien.
Braun-Blanquet J. 1964. Pflanzensoziologie. 3rd ed. Springer, Wien.
Braun J. & Furrer E. 1913. Remarques sur l'étude des groupements de plantes. Bull. Soc. Languedoc. Géogr. 36: 20–41.
Braun-Blanquet, J., Roussine N. & Nègre, R. 1951. Les groupements végétaux de la France Méditerranéenne. C.N.R.S. Service de la Carte des Groupements Végétaux.
Dale M. B. & Clifford H. T. 1976. On the effectiveness of higher taxonomic ranks for vegetation analysis. Austr. J. Ecol. 1: 37–62.
Doing Kraft H. 1956. The recent views concerning the association concept and the taxonomy of plant communities following the Braun-Blanquet method (in Dutch). Vakbl. Biol. 36(11): 222–234.
Elsol J. A. & Clifford H. T. 1988. Higher taxonomic descriptors for vegetation classification. Vegetatio 78: 103–107.
Guinochet M. 1955. Logique et dynamique du peuplement végétal. Coll. Ecol. Sci., Paris.
Hill M. O., Bunce R. G. H. & Shaw M. W. 1975. Indicator species analysis, a divisive polythetic method of classification, and its application to a survey of native pinewoods in Scotland. J. Ecol. 63: 597–613.
Koch W. 1926. Die Vegetationseinheiten der Linthebene unter Berücksichtigung der Verhältnisse in der N. O. Schweiz. Jb. St. Gall. Naturw. Ges. 61(2): 1–146.
Landolt E. 1977. The importance of closely related taxa for the delimitation of phytosociological units. Vegetatio 34: 179–189.
Massart, J. 1910. Esquisse da la géographie botanique de la Belgique. Lamertin (ed.), Bruxelles.
Meijer Drees E. 1951. Capita selecta from modern plant sociology and a design for rules of phytosociological nomenclature (in Dutch). Rapp. Bosb. proefst. Bogor 51: 1–218.
Moore J. J. 1962. The Braun-Blanquet system: a reassessment. J. Ecol. 10: 761–769.
Oberdorfer, E. 1957. Süddeutsche Pflanzengesellschaften. Jena.
Pignatti, S. 1968. Die Verwertung der sogenannten Gesamtarten für die floristische Systematik. In: Tüxen R. (ed.), Ber. Symp. Int. Ver. Veg.kunde Stolzenau 1964: 71–74.
Poore M. E. D. 1955. The use of phytosociological methods in ecological investigations, I, II, and III. J. Ecol. 43: 226–269.
Rybničkova 1974. Die Entwicklung der Vegetation und Flora im südlichen Teil der Böhmisch-Mährischen Höhe während des Spätglazials und Holozäns. Vegetace ČSSR, Ř.A.7. Praha.
Schwickerath M. 1940. Ausgleich- und Richtungsprinzip als Grundlage der Pflanzengesellschaftslehre. Repert. Spec. Nov. Regni Veg. Beih. 121: 53–67.
Schwickerath M. 1942. Bedeutung und Gliederung des Differentialartenbegriffs in der Pflanzengesellschaftslehre. Beih. Bot. Zentralbl. 61B: 351–383.
Szafer W. & Pawlowski B. 1927. Die Pflanzenassoziationen des Tatra-Gebirges. A. Bemerkungen über die angewandte Arbeitsmethodik. Bull. Int. Acad. Pol. Sci. Lettr. Cl. Sci. Nat. Math., B, 1926 (12), Suppl.: 1–12.
van derMaarel E. 1972. Ordination of plant communities on the basis of their plant genus, family and order relationships. In: van derMaarel E. & Tüxen R. (eds), Grundfragen und Methoden in der Pflanzensoziologie: 183–190. Junk, The Hague.
van derMaarel E., Janssen J. G. M. & Louppen J. M. W. 1978. Tabord, a program for structuring phytosociological tables. Vegetatio 38: 143–156.
Westhoff V. & denHeld A. J. 1969. Plantengemeen-schappen in Nederland. Thieme, Zutphen.
Westhoff, V. & van der Maarel, E. 1973. The Braun-Blanquet approach. In: Whittaker, R. (ed.), Ordination and classification of Communities, Handbook of Vegetation Science Part V: 617–726.
Westhoff V. & Passchier H. 1958. Distribution and ecology of Scheuchzeria palustris in the Netherlands, in particular the Besthmerven near Ommen (in Dutch). De Lev. Natuur 61: 59–67.
Whittaker R. H. 1962. Classification of natural communities. Bot. Rev. 28: 1–239.
Zoller H. 1954. Die Typen der Bromus erectus—Wiesen des Schweizer Juras. Ihre Abhängigkeit von den Standorts-bedingungen und wirtschaftlichen Einflüssen und ihre Beziehungen zur ursprünglichen Vegetation. Beitr. Geobot. Landesaufn. Schweiz. 33: 1–309.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Comm. no. 367 of the Biological Station Wijster of the Agricultural University Wageningen, The Netherlands
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Barkman, J.J. Fidelity and character-species, a critical evaluation. Vegetatio 85, 105–116 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00042260
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00042260