Skip to main content
Log in

Colocasia esculenta (L.) Schott, Colocasia antiquorum Schott, how many species? 1. A preliminary investigation

  • Miscellaneous
  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The taxonomy of edible Colocasia (Cocoyam) is confusing. The existence of one species, C. esculenta var. antiquorum or C. esculenta and C. antiquorum as two separate species is controversial. Nine high yielding Nigerian cultivars of cocoyam made up of members of the two taxa were grown under the same environmental conditions. As a preliminary investigation, 17 characters were monitored and recorded to help in the classification of the cultivars. Results showed that cocoyams can be grouped into two separate species. The qualities possessed by TCe 23, Nwine and Ukpon cultivars which include pink tuber skin, long or club shaped cormels and non-irritation in the throat when boiled and eaten, clearly distinguished them from those of Tce 15, 19, 27, 36, Ede-ofe and Kochuom.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bailey, L. M., 1925. Manual of cultivated plants. MacMillan, London. pp. 135–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrau, J., 1957. Les Aracées du tubercules alimentaires des Iles du Pacifique. Sud. J. Agric. Trop. Bot Appl. 4: 34–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coursey, D. G., 1968. The edible aroids. World Crops 20: 25–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagnauer, R., 1959. Taxonomic value of cyanogenesis in higher plants. Paper presented at the IX International Botanical Congress, Montreal. In: Recent Advances in Biology, Vol. 1. University of Toronto Press. 947 pp.

  • Haudricourt, A., 1941. Les Colocasiées alimentaires (taros et yautias). Rev. Bot. Appl. Agric. Trop. 21: 40–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, A. F., 1939. The nomenclature of the taro and its varieties. Bot. Mus. Leafl. Harv. Univ. 9: 113–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodge, W. H., 1954. Flora of Dominica, B. W. I, part 1. Lloydia 17: 155–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ikediobi, C. O. & L. C. Igboanusi, 1983. Identification of yam (Dioscorea spp.) species and cultivars by use of electrophoretic patterns of soluble tuber proteins. Biotropica 15 (1): 65–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonker-Verhoef, A. M. E. & F. P. Jonker, 1959. Notes on the Araceae of Suriname. II. Acta Botanica Neerlandica 8: 139–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Onwueme, I. C., 1978. The tropical tuber crops. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 234 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Onyilagha, J. C. & J. Lowe, 1986. Studies on the relationship of Dioscorea cayenensis and Dioscorea rotundata cultivars. Euphytica 35: 733–739.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purseglove, J. W., 1972. Tropical crops. Monocotyledons I and II. The English Language book Society and Longman. 607 pp.

  • Rogers, D. J. A., 1967. Computer aided morphological classification of Manihot esculenta Crantz. Proc. Int. Symp. on Trop. Root Crops. Trinidad, Section I, pp. 57–80.

  • Sivan, Pl., 1973. Effects of spacing in taro (Colocasia esculenta). 3rd Int. Symp. Trop. Root Crops, Ibadan, Nigeria.

  • Sneath, P. H. A. & R. R. Sokal, 1973. Numerical taxonomy. Freeman, W. H. & Company, San. Francisco, 573 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, R. R. & P. H. A. Sneath, 1963. Principles of numerical taxonomy. Freeman, W. H. & Company, San Franciso. 359 pp.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Onyilagha, J.C., Omenyi, A.S., Illoh, H.C. et al. Colocasia esculenta (L.) Schott, Colocasia antiquorum Schott, how many species? 1. A preliminary investigation. Euphytica 36, 687–692 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00041519

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00041519

Index words

Navigation