Skip to main content
Log in

Sources of resistance to Mayetiola Destructor in breadwheat and durum wheat in Morocco

  • Resistance and Tolerance
  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Grain yield reductions of both breadwheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and durum wheat (Triticum turgidum L. var. durum) caused by attacks of Hessian fly (Mayetiola destructor Say) are second perhaps only to those caused by inadequate soil moisture in Morocco. To identify effective sources of resistance, 817 entries of common wheat and durum wheat reported to be resistant to Hessian fly were evaluated under natural infestations in Morocco. A large number of genes conferring virulence are present in populations of Moroccan Mayetiola. The genes H1, H2, H3, h4, H6, H7, H8, H9, H10, H11, H14, H15, and H16 as well as the ‘Marquillo’, ‘Kawvale’ and PI 94587 resistance sources are not useful for cereal improvement in North Africa. ‘Luso’, which has the gene H12, also appeared susceptible in limited testing. Genotypes having the genes H5 and H13 were identified as significantly reducing larval survial in natural populations of Mayetiola. Of 11 resistant breadwheats identified with unknown genes, seven were from Portugal and three were from the Soviet Union. Although none of the durums tested had high levels of reistance, the two most promising durums were from Portugal. It is proposed that initially H5 be deployed in durum wheats and H13 be used in common wheat improvement. Leaf pubescence appears of little use in reducing the larval survival of Mayetiola.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alfaro, A., 1955. Mayetiola destructor Say, y Mayetiola mimeuri Mesnil, en Zaragosa: Boletin de Pathologia Vegetal y Entomologia Agricola 21: 85–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous, 1939. La Cecidomydae. Momento Dir. Gen. Agric. Comm. Colon. Def. Cult. #8, Defense des Vegetaux, 15 pp. Rabat, Morocco.

  • Aouni, A., 1984. Étude de la résistance à la cécidomyie (Mayetiola destructor Say) chez le blé dur (T. Durum Desf). Thesis School of Agriculture, Meknes, Morocco. 44 pp.

  • Balachowsky, A. & L. Mesnil, 1935. Les insectes nuisibles aux plantes cultivées, Vol. 1: 876–901. Paris, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, H. F., 1956, Gall midges of economic importance, pp. 95–146, Crosly Lockwood and Son Ltd, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, W. B. & R. G. Shands, 1944. Wheat varieties resistant to Hessian fly and their reaction to stem and leaf rusts. Technical Bulletin No. 877.

  • Coutin, R., Y. Durand & J. P. Moreau, 1973. Cécidomyies du blé et de l'orge au Maroc, Compte Rendu 4° Journée, Phytiatrie Phytopharmacie Circummediterranean, pp. 287–290.

  • Durand, Y., 1967a. Observations sur le cycle evolutif des Mayetiola vivant sur orge et blé au Maroc. Al Awamia 24: 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durand, Y., 1967b. Étude du comportement dans la nature de quelques variétés de blé et d'orge vis-a-vis des attaques de cécidomyies des céréales, Al Awamia 24: 27–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallun, R. L., 1977. Genetic basis of Hessian fly epidemics. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 287: 223–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatchett, J. H. & B. S. Gill, 1983, Expression and genetics of resistance to Hessian fly in Triticum tauschii (Coss), Schmal. Proc. Sixth Intern. Wheat Genetics Symp., Kyoto, Japan (in press).

  • Hudault, E & M. Jourdan, 1954. Essai de fecondation croisée de la cécidomyie du blé et de la cécidomyie de l'orge. Comptes Rendus du Seances Mensuelles, No. 5, Soc. des Sciences Naturelles et Physiques du Maroc, pp. 106–108.

  • Hudault, E. & Y. Zelensky, 1939. Contribution à la connaissance de la biologie de la cécidomyie destructive (Mayetiola destructor Say) au Maroc. Rev. Path. Veg. et d'Entomologie Agricole de France 26: 94–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jourdan, M. L., 1937. Observations sur la biologie de la cécidomyie destructive (Mayetiola destructor Say) au Maroc. Bul. de la Soc. des Sciences Naturelles au Maroc 17: 154–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jourdan, M. L., 1938a. Remarques sur les variations de certains organs de Mayetiola destructor Say. Encylopedie Entomologique, Series B. Diptera 8: 139–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jourdan, M. L., 1938b, Observations sur la biologie de la cécidomyie destructive (Mayetiola destructor Say) au Maroc (2 note), Bul. de la Soc. des Sciences Naturelles du Maroc 18: 161–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mesnil, L., 1934. Note preliminaire sur un noveau parasite des céréales Phytophaga mimeuri sp. Bul. de la Soc. Entomologique de France 17: 245–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberti, D., 1953. Contributo alla conoscenza delle specie italiane di Mayetiola Kieffer (Diptera-Cecidomyida). Bol. Lab. Ent. Agrar., Portici, Italy 12: 98–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, J. J., R. L. Gallun, F. L. Patterson & J. E. Foster, 1979. Effects of wheat leaf pubescence on the Hessian fly. J. Econ Entom. 72: 211–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shands, R. G. & W. B. Cartwright, 1953. A fifth gene conditioning Hessian fly responses in common wheat. Agron. J. 45: 302–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sosa, J. R. & J. E. Foster, 1976. Temperature and the expression of resistance in wheats to Hessian fly. Environ. Entomol. 5: 333–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tegyey, L., 1965. Quelques observations sur l'amélioration des blés. Al Awamia 16: 23–42.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gallagher, L.W., Benyassine, A., Benlhabib, O. et al. Sources of resistance to Mayetiola Destructor in breadwheat and durum wheat in Morocco. Euphytica 36, 591–602 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00041508

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00041508

Index words

Navigation