Skip to main content
Log in

Relationship between genealogical distance and breeding behaviour in oats (Avena sativa L.)

  • Variation-Induction, Maintenance and Analysis
  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Eight oat cultivars and experimental lines from four germplasm sources were crossed in a diallel mating design without reciprocals. F1 heterosis for grain yield was evaluated in two experiments, and 48 F2-derived lines from each of the 28 matings were evaluated for bundle weight, grain yield, straw yield, harvest index, height, and heading date in two experiments. Number of transgressive segregates per trait and generalized genetic variance were calculated for each mating. Genealogical distance for each mating was obtained by using coefficient of kinship based on the pedigree of the parents. The relationship between genealogical distance and the three types of breeding behaviour was examined via correlation and regression. Significant correlations occurred only for genealogical distance with numbers of transgressive segregates for height and with generalized genetic variances. Both were positive. Significant heterosis was observed for matings of more distantly related parents. Regressions on genealogical distance, when significant, were linear. Genealogical distance between parents was positive associated with diversity on the basis of breeding behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baum, B. R. & L. P. Lefkovitch, 1973. A numerical taxonomic study of phylogenetic and phenetic relationships in some cultivated oats using known pedigrees. Syst. Zool. 22: 118–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowen, N. M., 1985. Part II. Relationships between three measures of genetic distance and heterosis, transgressive segregation and generalized genetic variances in oats. In: N. M. Cowen, Genetic diversity of midwestern oat germplasm. Ph.D. dissertation Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa.

  • Cox, D. J. & K. J. Frey, 1984. Improving cultivated oat (Avena sativa L.) with alleles for vegetative growth index from A. sterilis L. Theor. Appl. Genet. 68: 239–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, T. S., 1979. Inheritance and complimetarity of genes for high groat protein from two Avena species. M. S. thesis. Iowa State University Library, Ames, Iowa.

  • Cruden, D., 1949. The computation of inbreeding coefficients for closed populations. J. Hered. 40: 248–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delanney, X., D. M. Rodgers & R. G. Palmer. 1983. Relative genetic contribution among ancestral lines to North American soybean cultivars. Crop Sci. 23: 944–949.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emik, L. O. & C. E. Terrill, 1949. Systematic procedures for calculating inbreeding coefficients. J. Hered. 40: 51–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fonesca, S. & F. L. Patterson, 1968. Hybrid vigor in a seven parent diallel cross in common winter wheat. Crop Sci. 8: 85–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, M. M., 1968. A measure of ‘overall’ variability in populations. Biometrics 24: 189–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, M. M., 1969. Measuring evolutionary divergence. Jpn. J. Genetics 44 (Suppl. 1): 310–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacquard, A., 1974. The genetic structure of populations. Trans. by D. & B. Charlesworth. Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, G., 1969. Heterosis and combining ability in hybrids of Avena sativa L. and A. byzantina C. Koch. J. Agric. Sci., Camb. 72: 85–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacCluer, J. W., A. J. Boyce, B. Dybe, L. R. Weitkamp, D. W. Pfenning & C. J. Parsons, 1983. Inbreeding and predigree structure in standard bred horses. J. Hered. 74: 394–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marani, A., 1963. Heterosis and combining ability for yield and components of yield in a diallel cross of two species of cotton. Crop Sci. 3: 552–555.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marani, A. & E. Avieli, 1973. Heterosis during the early phases of growth in intraspecific and interspecific crosses of cotton. Crop Sci 13: 15–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moll, R. H., W. S. Sulhuana & H. F. Robinson, 1962. Heterosis and genetic diversity in variety crosses of maize. Crop Sci. 2: 197–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, C. F., 1966. Heterotic responses in oats. Crop Sci. 6: 84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paterniani, R. & J. H. Lonnquist, 1963. Heterosis in interacial crosses of corn (Zea mays L.). Crop Sci. 2: 504–507.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petr, F. C. & K. J. Frey, 1967. Heterosis in oats. Crop Sci. 7: 33–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodgers, D. M., J. P. Murphy & K. J. Frey, 1983. Impact of plant breeding on the grain yield and genetic diversity of spring oats. Crop Sci. 23: 737–740.

    Google Scholar 

  • St. Martin, S. K., 1981. Effective population size for the soybean improvement program in maturity group 00 to IV. Crop Sci 21: 151–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, R. R., 1965. Statistical methods in systematics. Bio. Rev. Camb. Phil. Soc. 40: 337–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sriwantanapongse, S. & C. P. Wilsie, 1968. Intra- and intervariety crosses of Medicago sativa L. and Medicago talcata L. Crop Sci. 8: 465–466.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun, P. L. F., H. L. Shands & R. A. Forsberg, 1972. Inheritance of kernel weight in six spring wheat crosses. Crop Sci. 12: 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Widner, J. N. & K. L. Lesbock, 1973. Combining ability in durum wheat: I. Agronomic characteristics. Crop Sci. 13: 164–167.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Journal Paper No. J-11874 of the Iowa Agriculture and Home Economics Station, Iowa State Univ., Ames, IA 50011. Project 2447.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cowen, N.M., Frey, K.J. Relationship between genealogical distance and breeding behaviour in oats (Avena sativa L.). Euphytica 36, 413–424 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00041484

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00041484

Index words

Navigation