Skip to main content
Log in

Response of different wheat tissues to increasing doses of ethyl methanesulfonate

  • Published:
Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mutation experiments require careful selection of a mutagen with characteristics suited to the tissue source and mutagenesis objective, and an appropriate treatment regime. The objectives of the present investigation were:-to compare the ability of immature embryos to initiate calluses and calluses derived from immature embryos to survive and grow after being treated with ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS) doses of 0.2, 0.4, 0.8, 1.2, and 1.6% (v/v) and-to compare these results with those published for seed mutagenesis. To determine if the response of tissue source to EMS treatment varied with genotype, tissues from two spring wheat cultivars, ‘Angus’ and ‘Pavon 76’, were used. The combined analysis of variance detected highly significant differences (p≤0.01) among doses. The higher the dose, the lower the tissue survival in each tissue source. No significant differences were detected between cultivars, tissue sources, in the cultivar by dose interaction, tissue source by dose interaction, tissue source by cultivar interaction, or tissue source by cultivar by dose interaction. Hence, both cultivars and tissue sources responded similarly to EMS doses. The predicted LD20 are 0.35%±0.08% for the immature embryo treatment, and 0.36%±0.10% for the callus treatment. The predicted LD50 are 0.82%±0.13% for the immature embryo treatment, and 0.77%±0.13% for the callus treatment. These results were very similar to published results for seed mutagenesis, hence seed mutagenesis research may be applicable to immature embryo and callus mutagenesis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baenziger PS (1988) Biotechnology and mutation breeding. In: Semidwarf Cereal Mutants and their Use in Cross Breeding. III (pp 9–14). IAEA-Tecdoc-455. Vienna, Austria

  • Baenziger PS, Wesenberg DM, Smail VM, Alexander WL & Schaeffer GW (1989) Agronomic performance of wheat double haploid lines derived from cultivars by anther culture. Plant Breeding. 103: 101–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Cocking EC (1978) Prospects for the future: Cell culture. In: Seed Protein Improvement in Cereals and Grain Legumes, Vol II (pp 395–402). IAEA, Vienna, Austria

    Google Scholar 

  • Eapen S & Rao PS (1986) Spontaneous and induced variation in tissue cultures and regenerated plants of bread-wheat. In: Withers LA & Alderson PG (Eds) Plant Tissue Culture and Its Agricultural Applications (pp 461–467). Butterworths, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao MW, Liang ZG & Chen ZY (1988) Effect of gamma radiation on immature wheat embryo culture. In: Semi Dwarf Cereal Mutants and their use in Cross Breeding III (pp 177–182). IAEA, Vienna, Austria

    Google Scholar 

  • IAEA (1977) Manual on mutation breeding, second ed. Tech. Report Series no. 119. Vienna, Austria

  • Karp A & Bright SWJ (1985) On the causes and origins of somaclonal variation. Oxford Surv. Plant. Mol. Cell Biol. 2: 199–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Konzak CF (1981) Induced mutations for genetic analyses and improvement wheat. IAEA-SM-251/53. In: Induced Mutations—a Tool in Plant Research (pp 469–488). STI/PUB/591. Vienna, Austria

  • Konzak CF, Nilan RA, Wagner J & Foster RJ (1965) Efficient chemical mutagenesis. In: The use of induced Mutations in Plant Breeding. Suppl. to Rad. Bot. Vol 5 (pp 49–70). FAO/IAEA Tech. meeting. Pergamon Press, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Larkin PJ (1987) Somaclonal variation: history, method, and meaning. Iowa State J. Res. 61: 393–439

    Google Scholar 

  • Larkin PJ & Scowcroft WR (1981) Somaclonal variation — A novel source of variability from cell cultures for plant improvement. Theor. Appl. Genet. 60: 197–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddock SE, Lancaster VA, Risiott R & Franklin J (1983) Plant regeneration from cultured immature embryos and inflorescences of 25 cultivars of wheat (Triticum aestivum). J. Exp. Bot. 34: 915–926

    Google Scholar 

  • Moustafa RAK, Duncan DR & Widholm JM (1989) The effect of gamma radiation and N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea on cultured maize callus growth and plant regeneration. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 17: 121–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Müntzing A & Bose S (1969) Induced mutation in inbred lines of rye. I. EMS treatments. Hereditas. 62: 382–408

    Google Scholar 

  • Murashige T & Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant. 15: 473–497

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozias-Akins P & Vasil IK (1982) Plant regeneration from cultured immature embryos and inflorescences of Triticum aestivum L. (Wheat): evidence for somatic embryogenesis. Protoplasma. 110: 95–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao HKS & Sears ER (1964) Chemical mutagenesis in Triticum aestivum. Mutat. Res. 1: 387–399

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS (1985) SAS User's guide: Statistics. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Sears RG & Deckard EL (1982) Tissue culture variability in wheat: Callus induction and plant regeneration. Crop Sci. 22: 546–550

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheppard SC, Alder V, Evenden WG & Rossnagel BG (1989) Relationship between seed vigour and sensitivity to ionizing radiation. Seed Sci. & Tech. 17: 205–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Shimada T (1978) Plant regeneration from the callus induced from wheat embryo. Jpn. J. Genet. 53: 371–374

    Google Scholar 

  • Shimada T & Yamada Y (1979) Wheat plants regenerated from embryo cell cultures. Jpn. J. Genet. 54: 379–385

    Google Scholar 

  • Steel RGD & JH Torrie (1980) Principle and Procedures of Statistics: A Biometrical Approach, 2nd edition. McGraw-Hill Book Co. Inc., New York, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Walles S (1967) Studies on the uptake of ethyl methanesulfonate into embryos of barley. Hereditas. 58: 95–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Yonezawa K & Yamagata H (1977) On the optimum mutation rate and optimum dose for practical mutation breeding. Euphytica. 26: 413–426

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Published as paper No. 9241 journal series, Nebraska Agric. Res. Div.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Masrizal, Simonson, R.L. & Baenziger, P.S. Response of different wheat tissues to increasing doses of ethyl methanesulfonate. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 26, 141–146 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00039935

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00039935

Key words

Navigation