Skip to main content
Log in

Use of isozyme patterns in characterization of potato mutant lines selected for agronomic quantitative traits

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Seven varieties and 57 spontaneous or induced in vitro mutant lines (20 macromutant and 37 micromutant events) of potato were tested by starch gel electrophoresis for ADH, GOT, PGI, PGM, ACO, IDH, MDH and 6PGDH isozymes in tuber extracts. The data showed that in contrast to variety comparisons, the isozyme patterns rarely differentiate mutant lines which have altered morphological traits. But trying to identify isozyme differences in mutants can still be useful for a chimeric structure for GOT-2 alleles in a mutant from Atlantic and a new tuber specific locus for 6PGDH in mutants from Russet Burbank were found.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ACO:

aconitase

ADH:

alcohol dehydrogenase

GOT:

glutamate oxaloacetate transaminase

IDH:

isocitric acid dehydrogenase

MDH:

malate dehydrogenase

6PGDH:

6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase

PGI:

phosphoglucoisomerase

PGM:

phosphoglucomutase

SGE:

starch gel electrophoresis

EMS:

ethyl metanesulfonate

References

  • Allicchio, R., C., Antonioli, L., Graziani, R., Roncarati & C., Vannini, 1987. Isozyme variation in leaf-callus regenerated plants of Solanum tuberosum. Pl. Science 53: 81–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S.G. & P., Seilleur, 1986. Characterization of somaclonal variations in potato: a biochemical approach. In: J., Semal (Ed.). Somaclonal variations and crop improvement, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht, Boston, Lancaster, 229–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, D.C., 1983. Isozymic variation and plant breeders' rights. In: S.D., Tanksley & T.J., Orton (Eds.). Isozymes in plant genetics and breeding, part A. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, 425–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boersig, M. & D., Mitten, 1990. Effects of tissue source and mutagen treatment on variability of regenerated potato lines. Amer. Potato J. 67: 54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonierbale, M.W., M.W., Ganal & S.D., Tanksley, 1990. Applications of restriction fragment length polymorphisms and genetic mapping in potato breeding and molecular genetics. In: M.E., Vayda & W.D., Park (Eds.). The molecular and cellular biology of the potato, C.A.B. International, Oxon, U.K., 13–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douches, D. & C., Quiros, 1987a. Additional isozyme loci in tuber-bearing Solanums: inheritance and linkage relationships. J. Heredity 79: 377–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douches, D. & C., Quiros, 1987b. Use of 4x−2x crosses to determine gene-centromere map distances of isozyme loci in Solanum species. Genome 29: 519–527.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douches, D., K., Ludlam & E., Varga, 1989. Electrophoretic survey of North American potato varieties. Amer. Potato J. 66: 518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groza, H., 1980. Possibilités d'utiliser la mutagenèse en vue de l'amélioration de la pomme de terre. Bulletin de l'Académie des Sciences Agricoles et Forestières, Romania, 10: 25–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groza, H., S., Love & D., Hane, 1989. Repeatability within standard varieties as a basis for clonal selection in a possible variety improvement program. Amer. Potato J. 66: 521.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holm, D.G., 1988. Sangre selection studies: 1. Selection and comparative trials. Amer. Potato J. 65: 21–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Love, S.L., 1989. Selection of gamma ray induced blackspot bruise resistant potato mutants from the susceptible cultivar Lemhi Russet. Amer. Potato J. 66: 531.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, B., J.E., Staub & L.J., Kuhns, 1982. Potato cultivars: Genetic variation within putative clones. Amer. Potato J. 59: 179–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G.A. & G.B., collins, 1983. New challenges confronting plant breeders. In: Tanksley and T.J., Orton (Eds.). Isozymes in plant genetics and breeding, part A. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, 25–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quiros, C.F. & N., McHale, 1985. Genetic analysis of isozyme variants in diploid and tetraploid potatoes. Genetics 111: 131–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz-Nieto, A., M., Vilchez, A., Chueca & J., Lopez-Gorge, 1989. Analisis varietal de Solanum tuberosum por electroen-focque analitico de proteinas del suero del tuberculo. Rev. Agroquim. Tecnol. Aliment. 29: 340–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, J.F., D., Bidney & E., Shahin, 1980. Potato protoplasts in crop improvement. Science 208: 17–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snedecor, G.W., 1956. Statistical methods, applied to experiments in agriculture and biology. The Iowa State College Press, Ames, Iowa, 221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sree Ramulu, K., 1986. Origin and nature of somaclonal variation in potato. In: J., Semal (Ed.). Somaclonal variations and crop improvement, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht, Boston, Lancaster, pp. 188–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suurs, L.C.J.M., E., Jongedijk & M.M.C., Tan, 1989. Polyacrylamide gradient-gel electrophoresis: a routine method for high resolution isozyme electrophoresis of Solanum and Lycopersicum species. Euphytica 40: 181–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, A.J., 1987. The potential value of somaclonal variants in potato improvement. In: G.J., Jellis & D.E., Richardson (Eds.). The production of new potato varieties: technological advances, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New York, Melbourne 327–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van, Harten, A.M., 1978. Mutation breeding techniques and behavior of irradiated shoot apices of potato. Pudoc, Wageningen, 132 pp.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Groza, H., Kahn, R. Use of isozyme patterns in characterization of potato mutant lines selected for agronomic quantitative traits. Euphytica 57, 189–194 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00039665

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00039665

Key words

Navigation