Skip to main content
Log in

Studies on the breeding of self-pollinating cereals

The composite cross bulk population method

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There exists a great amount of genetic diversity and of free as well as potential variability among and within the familial lines. Consequently, natural selection acting through heterozygote advantage and differential competing ability has often sufficient plasticity in the genetic composition to mould into better adaptive types. Whether fitness and agronomic productivity of a bulk population are improved simultaneously would depend upon the relationship between the two genetic systems governing them. In case of a linear correlation such as one observed in the barley material studied, the bulk method seems to be quite promising, particularly in view of the great economy in cost and labour involved in the entire program. Another important feature is, at least on theoretical grounds, the greater stability in the performance of a mixed population owing to a wider adaptive base against different environments, or such adverse factors as a coevolving group of some pathogenic races. However, it appears that progress under natural selection is perhaps too slow and therefore, artificial selection might also be resorted to at suitable stages in the bulk program on the basis of usual testing and evaluating procedures. Isolation of superior familial lines by the F10 or F15 generation followed by their separate bulk propagation might prove an efficient scheme.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Allard, R. W., The relationship between genetic diversity and consistency of performance in different environments. (in press).

  2. Allard, R. W. and S. K. Jain, Population studies in predominantly self-pollinated species. II. An analysis of quantitative genetic changes in a bulk-hybrid population of barley. Evolution (in press).

  3. Atkins R. E. and H. C. Murphy, Evaluation of yield potentialities of oat crosses from bulk hybrid tests. Agron. J. 41 (1949): 41–45.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bal, B. S., A study of associated characters in three mass-selected barley populations of Composite Cross II, F30. Unpublished M.S. Thesis, University of California. 1957.

  5. Fowler W. L. and E. G. Heyene, Evaluation of bulk hybrid tests for predicting performance of pure line selections in hard red winter wheat. Agron. J. 47 (1955): 430–434.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Grafius J. E., W. L. Nelson and V. A. Dirks, The heritability of yield in barley as measured by early generation bulked progenies. Agron. J. 44 (1952): 253–257.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Harlan, H. V., M. L. Martin and H. Stevens, A study of methods in barley breeding, U.S.D.A. Tech. Bull. no. 720. 1940.

  8. Harlan J. R., Distribution and utilization of natural variability in cultivated plants. Brookhaven Symp. Biol. 9 (1956): 191–206.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jain, S. K., Stabilizing selection for heading time in a bulk-hybrid population of barley. Nature (in press).

  10. Jain S. K. and R. W. Allard, Population studies in predominantly self-pollinated species. I. Evidence for heterozygote advantage in a closed population of barley. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. (U.S.) 46 (1960): 1373–1379.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jain, S. K. and R. W. Allard, Natural selection at the aleurone color loci in barley. (in preparation).

  12. Lupton F. G. H. and R. N. H. Whitehouse, Studies on the breeding of self-pollinating cereals. I. Selection methods in breeding for yield. Euphytica 6 (1957): 169–184.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Manning H. L., Response to selection for yield in cotton. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 20 (1955): 103–110.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sakai K., Competition in plants and its relation to selection. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 20 (1955): 137–157. (see the discussion by O. H. Frankel at the end of this paper).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Stebbins G. L., Self-fertilization and population variability in the higher plants. Amer. Naturalist 41 (1957): 337–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Suneson C. A., An evolutionary plant breeding method. Agron. J. 48 (1956): 188–191.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Suneson, C. A. and H. Stevens, Studies with bulked hybrid populations of barley. U.S.D.A. Tech. Bull. no. 1067. 1953.

  18. Whitehouse R. N. H., J. B. Thompson and M. A. M. Do Valle Ribejro, Studies on the breeding of self-pollinating cereals. 2. The use of a diallel cross analysis in yield prediction. Euphytica 7 (1958): 147–169.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wright S., The analysis of variance and the correlations between relatives with respect to deviations from an optimum. Jour. Genetics 30 (1935): 243–256.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wright S., Modes of selection. Amer. Naturalist 90 (1956): 5–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Now at the Division of Botany, I.A.R.I., New Delhi 12, India.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jain, S.K. Studies on the breeding of self-pollinating cereals. Euphytica 10, 315–324 (1961). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00039102

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00039102

Keywords

Navigation