Skip to main content
Log in

Genotypic and environmental influence upon the nutritional composition of barley grain

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The grain yield and contents of the quantitatively predominant nutritional constituents of barley grain were determined in nine adapted spring barley varieties each grown at seven European locations with three or four replications.

The largest variation in nutritional composition was due to different environmental conditions, but genotypic effects were also present. Interactions between genotype and environment were small. The average protein content at different locations varied from 8.1 to 14.7 per cent of the grain dry matter, and was not simply related to the amount of fertilizer-N applied.

The nutritional composition of the grain was influenced by the grain yield level. The percentage of dietary fiber and protein decreased with increasing grain yield, but some varietal differences which were independent of the grain yield level could be established.

The protein quality depended upon the protein level, as the protein contained more prolamin relatively to non-prolamin protein at high than at low protein levels. A difference between two varieties in the prolamin/non-prolamin ratio was consistent over a wide range of variation in protein content.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andersen, A. J., 1977. Effects of fertilizers on barley protein quantity and quality. Cereal Res. Comm. 5 (2): 158–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruhn, L. C. & R. Djurtoft, 1977. Protease inhibitors in barley. Z. Lebensm. Untersuch.-Forsch. 163: 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calvert, C. C., 1975. Nutritional implications of amylose-amylopectin ratio in barley cultivars for rats and swine. (Thesis). Montana State University, Boseman, Montana, USA.

  • Doll, H., 1972. Variation in protein quantity and quality induced in barley by EMS treatment. In: Induced mutations and plant improvement. IAEA, Vienna, p. 331–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eggum, B. O. & L. D. Campbell, 1979. Nutritional and antinutritional assay. In: Seed protein improvement in cereals and grain legumes. Vol. I. IAEA, Vienna, p. 353–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischbeck, G., 1963. Untersuchungen über Ausmass, Sicherheit und Ursachen erblicher Unterschiede im Rohproteingehalt der Sommergerste. Z. Acker- und Pflanzenbau 118(4): 321–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadjichristodoulou, A. & A. Della, 1978. Factors affecting genotypic and environmental variance for crude protein content in cereals. Euphytica 27: 117–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jestin, L., 1978. The protein content of spring barley varieties: genetic variations, fluctuations and interactions with environment. In: B. J. Miflin & M. Zoschke (Eds), Carbohydrate and protein synthesis. Commission of the European Communities. EUR 6043EN, p. 55–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Køie, B. & G. Nielsen, 1977. Extraction and separation of hordeins. In: B. J. Miflin & P. R. Shewry (Eds), Techniques for the separation of barley and maize seed protein. Commission of the European Communities, EUR 5687E. p. 25–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCready, R. M., J. Guggolz, V. Silviera & H. S. Owens, 1950. Determination of starch and amylose in vegetables. Anal. Chem. 22: 1156–1158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munck, L., 1972. Improvement of nutritional value in cereals. Hereditas 72: 1–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pomeranz, Y., G. S. Robbins, J. T. Gilbertson & G. D. Booth, 1977. Effects of nitrogen fertilization on lysine, threonine and methionine of hulled and hull-less barley cultivars. Cereal Chem. 54(5): 1034–1042.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmusson, D. C. & R. L. Glass, 1967. Estimates of genetic and environmental variability in barley. Crop Sci. 7: 185–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stølen, O. & B. T. Viuf, 1978. Protein production in barley. I. Influences of different growing conditions. Kgl. Vet.-og Landbohøjsk. Årsskr. 1979, p. 64–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torp, J., 1979. Relations between production of starch and percentage, quality and yield of protein in barley. Z. Acker- und Pflanzenbau 148: 367–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torp, J., 1980. Variation in the concentration of major carbohydrates in the grain of some spring barleys. J. Sci. Food Agric. 31: 1354–1360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehouse, R. N. H., 1968. Barley breeding at Cambridge. Rep. Pl. Breed. Inst. 1968, p. 6–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehouse, R. N. H., 1973. The potential of cereal grain crops for protein production. In: J. G. W. Jones (Ed.), The biological efficiency of protein production. University Press, Cambridge, p. 83–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, M. J., E. H. Melvin, W. J. Garcia, R. J. Dimler & W. F. Kwolek, 1970. Amylose determination in dimethyl sulfoxide extracts of maize. Cereal Chem. 47: 437–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, M. J., U. Khoo & G. E. Inglett, 1977. Partial digestibility of cooked amylomaize starch in humans and mice. Staerke 12: 401–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodham, A. A., S. Savić & W. R. Hepburn, 1972. Evaluation of barley as a source of protein for chicks. J. Sci. Food Agric. 23: 1045–1054.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Torp, J., Doll, H. & Haahr, V. Genotypic and environmental influence upon the nutritional composition of barley grain. Euphytica 30, 719–728 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00038800

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00038800

Index words

Navigation