Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of random bulk population and single-seed-descent methods for lentil breeding

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Three lentil (Lens culinaris Medic.) populations were advanced from the F2 to the F4 generation by singleseed-descent (SSD) and bulk-population (BP) breeding methods and used to compare the relative efficiency of the methods for maintaining genetic variation and selection opportunities.

SSD maintained more genetic variation (% MathType!MTEF!2!1!+-% feaafiart1ev1aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn% hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr% 4rNCHbGeaGak0dh9WrFfpC0xh9vqqj-hEeeu0xXdbba9frFj0-OqFf% ea0dXdd9vqaq-JfrVkFHe9pgea0dXdar-Jb9hs0dXdbPYxe9vr0-vr% 0-vqpWqaaeaabaGaaiaacaqabeaadaqaaqaaaOqaaiqbeo8aZzaaja% Waa0baaSqaaiaadEgaaeaacaaIYaaaaaaa!3B04!\[\hat \sigma _g^2 \]) in 15 of 21 comparisons of characters that were made. Genetic variances were significantly higher with SSD for plant height, days to maturity and yield in population 1; height of lowest pod in population 2; and days to blooming, height of lowest pod, plant type, and yield in population 3. SSD-derived populations had 10, 9, and 13% more erect lines in the three populations, respectively, when compared to the same populations advanced by BP. The BP method maintained 14, 2, and 4% more taller types in the three populations, respectively, and 16 and 33% more segregants that carried their pods higher from the ground. This indicated a reduced frequency of short plants with low flowers as a result of natural selection operating within BP against less competitive short types. The SSD method is an efficient cost-saving method of advancing lentil populations and is recommended for lentil breeding.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allard, R. W., 1960. Principles of plant breeding. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York. 485 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boerma, H. R. & R. L. Cooper, 1973. Comparison of three selection methods for yield in soybeans. Agron. Abstr. p. 3.

  • Brim, C. A., 1966. A modified pedigree method of selection in soybeans. Crop Sci. 6: 220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casali, V. W. & E. C. Tigchelaar, 1975. Computer simulation studies comparing pedigree, bulk, and single seed descent selection in self pollinated populations. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 100: 364–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Empig, L. T. & W. R. Fehr, 1971. Evaluation of methods for generation advance in bulk-hybrid soybean populations. Crop Sci. 11: 51–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goulden, C. H., 1939. Problems in plant selections. In: R. C. Burnett (Ed.), Proc. 7th Int. Genet. Congr. (Edinburgh). Cambridge U. Press. p. 132–133.

  • Grafius, J. E., 1965. Short cuts in plant breeding. Crop Sci. 5: 377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harlan, H. V. & Mary L. Martini, 1938. The effects of natural selection in a mixture of barley varieties. J. Agric. Res. 57: 189–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, P. R. & R. C. Aquino, 1968. Studies on competition in rice. III. The mechanism of competition among phenotypes. Evolution 22: 529–542.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, P. R. & J.de JesusJr., 1968. Studies on competition in rice. I. Competition in mixture of varieties. Evolution 22: 119–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, P. R. & R. M. Herrera, 1968. Studies on competition in rice. II. Competition in Segregating populations. evolution 22: 332–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, N. F. & W. T. Federer, 1965. Competing ability in wheat. Crop sci. 5: 449–452.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, M. L., 1971. The random method of oat breeding for productivity. Can. J. Plant Sci. 51: 13–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khalifa, M. A. & C. O. Qualset, 1974. Intergenotypic competition between tall and warf wheats. I. In mechanical mixtures. Crop Sci. 14: 795–799.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khalifa, M. A. & C. O. Qualset, 1975. Intergenotypic competition between tall and dwarf wheats. II. In hybrid bulks. Crop Sci. 15: 640–644.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knott, D. R. & J. Kumar, 1975. Comparison of early generation yield testing and a single seed descent procedure in wheat breeding. Crop Sci. 15: 295–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, R. J., J. R. Wilcox & F. A. Laviolette, 1978. Variability in soybean progenies developed by single seed descent at two plant populations. Crop Sci. 18: 359–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mumaw, C. R. & C. R. Weber, 1957. Competition and natural selection in soybean varietal composites. Agron. J. 49: 154–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, S. J., E. J. Walsh, E. Reinbergs, L. S. P. Song & K. J. Hasha, 1976. Field performance of doubled haploid barley lines in comparison with lines developed by the pedigree and single seed descent methods. Can. J. Plant Sci. 56: 467–474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, N. N., 1976. Inter-genotypic plant competition in wheat under single seed descent breeding. Euphytica 25: 219–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suneson, C. A., 1949. Survival of four barley varieties in a mixture. Agron. J. 41: 459–461.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suneson, C. A. & H. Stevens, 1953. Studies with bulk hybrid populations of barley. U.S. Dept. Agric. Tech. Bul. 1067.

  • Suneson, C. A. & G. A. Wiebe, 1942. Survival of barley and wheat varieties in mixtures. J. Amer. Soc. Agron. 34: 1052–1056.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tee, T. S. & C. O. Qualset, 1975. Bulk populations in wheat breeding: comparison of single-seed descent and random bulk methods. Euphytica 24: 393–405.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Scientific Paper No. 5478.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Haddad, N.I., Muehlbauer, F.J. Comparison of random bulk population and single-seed-descent methods for lentil breeding. Euphytica 30, 643–651 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00038792

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00038792

Index words

Navigation