Skip to main content
Log in

Use of index selection in recurrent selection programs in maize

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Phenotypic and genotypic correlations were examined for four traits in seven populations of maize (Zea mays L.) undergoing recurrent selection. Correlations among grain yield and percentage of grain moisture, root lodging, and stalk lodging were low (|r|<0.3) except for the correlation between grain yield and stalk lodging, which was high and negative. The phenotypic and genotypic correlations agreed well from cycle to cycle within populations. Variation of correlations among populations was not significantly larger than variation among cycles. Heritabilities of these traits generally were high (h2>0.5). Two indices, one that used heritabilities as index weights and one that used relative economic weights (base index) as index weights, were compared with the Smith-Hazel index (optimim index). Relative efficiencies of the two indices, in terms of predicted gains for the individual traits and the composite trait, compared with the Smith-Hazel index, were high. The use of an index in which heritabilities were used as index weights was recommended because:1) the heritabilities were the same as the optimum weights when the traits were uncorrelated, and for the data examined the correlations were low; and 2) heritabilities were computed in routine data analyses and were available at no additional cost.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Crosbie, T. M., J. J. Mock & O. S. Smith, 1980. Comparison of gains predicted by several selection methods for cold tolerance traits of two maize populations. Crop Sci. 20: 649–654.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elston, R. C., 1963. A weight-free index for the purpose of ranking or selection with respect to several traits at a time. Biometrics 19: 85–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazel, L. N., 1943. The genetic basis for constructing selection indexes. Genetics 28: 476–490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidhues, T., 1961. Relative accuracy of selection indices based on estimated genotypic and phenotypic parameters. Biometrics 17: 502–503.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulamba, N. N. & J. J. Mock, 1978. Improvement of yield potential of the Eto Blanco maize (Zea mays L.) population by breeding for plant traits. Egypt. J. Genet. Cytol. 7: 40–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pesek, J. & R. J. Baker, 1969. Desired improvement in relation to selection indices. Can. J. Plant Sci. 49: 803–804.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, H. F., 1936. A discriminant function for plant selection. Ann. Eugen. 7: 240–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprague, G. F. & S. A. Eberhart, 1977. Corn breeding. p. 305–362. In: G. F. Sprague (Ed.), Corn and corn improvement. Am. Soc. Agron., Madison, WI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Subandi, W. A. Compton & L. T. Empig. 1973. Comparison of the efficiencies of selection indices for three traits in two variety crosses of corn. Crop Sci. 13: 184–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. S., 1962. The evaluation of a selection index. Biometrics 18: 375–393.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Joint contribution: USDA-SEA-AR and Journal Paper No. 10152 of the Iowa Agriculture and Home Economics Exp. Stn., Ames, Iowa. Project 2194.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Smith, O.S., Hallauer, A.R. & Russell, W.A. Use of index selection in recurrent selection programs in maize. Euphytica 30, 611–618 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00038788

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00038788

Index words

Navigation