Summary
Phylogenetic relations among the three species in grain amaranth need investigation to provide information for breeding experiments germplasm conservation efforts, and decision on evolutionary patterns in the grain types. Hybrid development from crosses between species was studied to find out genetic relationship between them. Interspecific crosses were made among Amaranthus hypochondriacus, A. caudatus and A. cruentus in the glasshouse. The F1 plants were relatively easy to obtain but had low pollen fertility (10.3–15.1%) and low seed set. A few of these hybrids did not produce seeds. Only a few F1 seeds obtained in crosses between A. cruentus and A. caudatus. All the F1 plants from these crosses died at the seedling stage. Crosses between A. cruentus and A. hypochondriacus produced few seeds. Most of the F1 plants obtained from the seeds died at the seedling stage with only four plants growing to maturity but were sterile. Based on hybrid development, it was suggested that A. hypochondriacus and A. caudatus were genetically closer than the other two combinations of species studied. A. cruentus seemed to be genetically closer to A. hypochondriacus than it was to A. caudatus.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Coons M.P., 1982. Relationships of Amaranthus caudatus. Econ. Bot. 36 (2): 129–146.
Grant W.F., 1959. Cytogenetic studies in Amaranthus. Chromosome number and phylogenetic aspects. Can J. Genet. Cytol. I: 313–328.
Grubben G.J.H., 1976. The cultivation of amaranths as a tropical leafy vegetable, with special reference to South Dahomey. Comm. No. 67. Agric. Research, Royal Tropical Institute Amsterdam. The Netherlands. 207 pp.
Gudu S. & V.K. Gupta, 1987. Electrophoresis as an aid for identification of various species and cultivars of grain amaranths. E.A.J. of Agric. and Forestry; 52 (4): 244–250.
Laidig, C.L., E.G. Knox & R.A. Duchman, 1984. Underexploited Crops. P.V. Amirato, D.A. Evans, W.R. Sharp & Y. Yamada. Handbook of plant cell culture Vol. 3. Crop Species 38–64. MacMillan Publishing Company.
National Academy of Science, 1975. Under-exploited tropical plants with promising economic value. National Academy of Science, Washington, D.C. U.S.A. 189 pp.
National Academy of Science, 1984. Amaranth. Modern prospects for an ancient crop. National Academy Press, 89 pp.
Pal M. & T.N. Khoshoo, 1972. Evolution and improvement of cultivated amaranths. V. Inviability, weakness and sterility in hybrids. J. Hered. 63: 78–82.
Pal M. & T.N. Khoshoo, 1973. Evolution and improvement of cultivated amaranths. VI. Cytogenetic relationships in grain types. Theor. Appl. Genetics 43: 242–251.
Sauer J.D., 1950. The grain amaranths: A survey of their history and classification. Ann Missouri Bot. Garden 37: 561–632.
Sauer J.D., 1967. The grain amaranths and their relatives; A revised taxonomic and geographic survey. Ann. Missouri Bot. Garden 54: 103–137.
Sauer, J.D. 1976. Grain amaranths: Amaranthus (Amaranthaceae) In: N.W. Simmonds (Ed.). Evolution of crop plants, p. 4–6.
Singh, H.B. 1961. Grain amaranths buckwheat and chenopods. I.C.A.R. Cereal Crop Series No. 1. New Delhi.
Tucker J.M. and J.D. Sauer, 1958. Aberrant Amaranthus population of Sacramento San Joaquin Delta, California, Madrono. 14: 252–261.
Vietmeyer N. 1982. The revival of Amaranths, Cores FAO Review on Agriculture and Development 15 (5): 43–46.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Research was supported by Grand No. AMA-KE-4-83-22. (CRG GRANT) from the National Academy of Science, U.S.A.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gupta, V.K., Gudu, S. Interspecific hybrids and possible phylogenetic relations in grain amaranths. Euphytica 52, 33–38 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00037854
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00037854