Skip to main content
Log in

Highly efficlent plant regeneration from mesophyll protoplasts of Indian field cultivars of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum)

  • Research Note
  • Published:
Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Three Indian cultivars ofL. esculentum were assessed for shoot regeneration from protoplast-derived calli. Consistent yields of viable protoplasts (>9.0×106 g f.wt.-1) were obtained from leaflets of 14 days old cultured shoots. Protoplast viability (88–94%) and planting efficiency (55–70%) were recorded for the three cultivars. Up to 71% of the protoplast-derived tissues regenerated shoots.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

BAP:

6-benzylaminopurine

2,4-d :

2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid

g f.wt.:

gram fresh weight

IAA:

indoleacetic acid

MS:

Murashige & Skoog (1962)

NAA:

α-naphthaleneacetic acid

Zea:

zeatin

References

  • Bonnema AB & O'Connell MA (1992) Molecular analysis of the nuclear organellar genotype of somatic hybrid plants between tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) andLycopersicon chilense. Plant Cell Rep. 10: 629–632

    Google Scholar 

  • Koorneef MH & Martinelli L (1987) A genetic analysis of cell culture traits in tomato. Theor. Appl. Genet. 74: 633–641

    Google Scholar 

  • McCormick S, Niedermeyer J, Fry J, Barnason A, Horsch R & Fraley R (1986) Leaf disc transformation of cultivated tomato (L. esculentum) usingAgrobacterium tumefacies. Plant Cell Rep. 5: 81–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Murashige T & Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant. 15: 473–497

    Google Scholar 

  • Niedz RP, Rutter SM, Handley LW & Sink KC (1985) Plant regeneration from leaf protoplasts of six tomato cultivars. Plant. Sci. 39: 199–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Pieterse C & Koornneef M (1988) Optimization of direct gene transfer in tomato. In: Puite KJ, Dons JJM, Huizing HJ, Kool AJ, Koornneef M & Krens FA (Eds) Progress in Plant Protoplast Research. Proc 7th Int Protoplast Symp, Wageningen (pp 357–358). Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Shahin EA (1986) Totipotency of tomato protoplasts. Theor. Appl. Genet. 69: 325–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan MMC, Rietveld EM, Van Merrewijk GAM & Kool AJ (1987) Regeneration of leaf mesophyll protoplasts of tomato cultivars (L. esculentum): factors important for efficient protoplast culture and plant regeneration. Plant Cell Rep. 6: 172–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Tewes A, Glund K, Walther R & Reinbothe H (1984) High yield isolation and rapid recovery of protoplasts from suspension culture of tomato (L. esculentum). Z.Pflanzenphysiol. 113: 141–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Wijbrandi J, van Capelle WV, Hanhart CJ, van Leonen Matinet-Schuringa EP & Koornneef M (1990) Selection and characterization of somatic hybrids betweenL. esculentum andL. peruvianum. Plant Sci. 70: 197–208

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Patil, R.S., Davey, M.R. & Power, J.B. Highly efficlent plant regeneration from mesophyll protoplasts of Indian field cultivars of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum). Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 36, 255–258 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00037728

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00037728

Key words

Navigation