Skip to main content
Log in

An evaluation of antibiotics for the elimination ofXanthomonas campestris pv.pelargonii (Brown) fromPelargonium x domesticum cv. ‘Grand Slam’ explants in vitro

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A range of antibiotics was evaluated for activity againstXanthomonas campestris pv.pelargonii (Xep) on diagnostic sensitivity testing and plant tissue culture media. Many of the antibiotics showed reduced or no activity on the latter. Tetracycline and cefotaxime, chosen for further investigation, were screened for light stability under plant culture regimes. Tetracycline was inactivated in photosynthetic photon fluxes of 22 μmol m-2 s-1 and above. The minimum bacteriocidal concentration of cefotaxime was determined in bacteriological and plant tissue culture media. Cefotaxime was further tested for phytoxicity and ability to eliminate Xcp from deliberately infected explants. Cefotaxime was shown to eliminate contamination and stimulate the growth of the plant tissue cultures up 500 mg l-1.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

DST:

diagnostic sensitivity testing medium

MBC:

minimum bacteriocidal concentration

TCM:

half-strength Murashige & Skoog (1962) basal plant tissue culture medium

Xcp:

Xanthomonas campestris pv.pelargonii

BA:

benzyladenine

2,4-d :

2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid

OD:

optical density

PPF:

photosynthetic photon flux

References

  • Bastaiens L, Maene L, Harbaoui Y, Van Sumere C, Van De Castelle KL & Debergh PC (1983) The influence of antibacterial products on plant tissue cultures. Med. Fac. Landbouww. Rijksuniv. Gent 48: 13–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Bechte RM & Scherr GH (1958) A new agar for in vitro antimicrobial sensitivity testing. Antibiotics and Chemotherapy 8: 599–606

    Google Scholar 

  • Bondi A, Spauling EH, Smith ED & Dietz CC (1947) A routine method for the rapid determinaiton of susceptibility to penicillin and other antibiotics. Amer. J. Med. 214: 221–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Boxus PH & Terzi JM (1987) Big losses due to bacterial contamination can be avoided in mass propagation scheme. Acta Hort. 212: 91–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassells AC (1986) Production of healthy plants. In: Alderson PG & Dullforce WM (Eds) Micropropagation in Horticulture (pp 53–71). University of Nottingham, Trent Print Unit, Nottingham

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassells AC (1991a) Problems in tissue culture: culture contamination. In: Debergh PC & Zimmerman RH (Eds) Micropropagation (pp 31–44). Kluwer Dordrecht

  • Cassells AC (1991b) Screening for pathogens and contaminating organisms in mircopropagation. In: Duncan JM & Torrance L (Eds) Techniques for the Rapid Diagnosis of Plant Pathogens (pp 179–191). Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassells AC & Carney BF (1987) Adventitious regeneration inPelargonium x domesticum Bailey. Acta Hort. 212: 419–423

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassells AC, Harmey MA, Carney BF, McCarthy E & McHugh A (1988) Problems posed by cultivable bacteria and endophytes in the establishment of axenic cultures ofPelargonium x domesticum: the use ofXanthomonas pelargonii specific ELISA, DNA probes and culture indexing in the screening of antibiotic treated and untreated donor plants. Acta Hort. 225: 153–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornu D & Michel MF (1987) Bacteria contaminants in shoot cultures ofPrunus avium L. choice and phytotoxicity of antibiotics. Acta Hort. 212: 83–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Debergh PC & Maene LJ (1981) A scheme for commercial propagation of ornamental plants by tissue culture. Scientia Horta. 14: 335–345

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodds JH & Roberts LW (1981) Some inhibitory effects of gentamicin on plant tissue cultures. In Vitro 17: 467–470

    Google Scholar 

  • Falkiner FR (1988) Strategy for the selection of antibiotics for use against common bacterial pathogens and endophytes of plants. Acta Hort. 225: 53–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Falkiner FR (1990) The criteria for choosing an antibiotic for control of bacteria in plant tissue culture. Int. Assoc. Plant Tissue Culture Newsl. 60: 13–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrod LP, Lambert HP & O'Grady F (1973) Antibiotics and Chemotherapy (pp 145) Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Leifert C (1990) Contaminants of plant tissue cultures. PhD thesis, University of Nottingham, Nottingham

    Google Scholar 

  • Leifert C & Waites WM (1990) Contaminants of plant tissue cultures. Int. Assoc. Plant Tissue Culture Newsl. 60: 2–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Leifert C, Camotta H, Wright SM, Waites B, Chayne V & Waites WM (1991) Elimination ofLactobacillus plantarum, Corynebacterium spp.,Staphylococcus saprophyticus andPseudomonas paucimobilis from micropropagatedHemerocallis, Choisya andDelphinium cultures using antibiotics. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 71: 307–330

    Google Scholar 

  • Long RD, Curtin TF & Cassells AC (1988) An investigation of the effects of bacterial contamination of potato nodal cultures. Acta Hort. 225: 83–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathias RJ & Boyd LA (1986) Cefotaxime stimulates callus growth, embryogenesis and regeneration in hexaploid bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Plant Sci. 46: 212–223

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathias RJ & Mukasa C (1987) The effect of cefotaxime on the growth and regeneration of callus from four varieties of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Plant Cell Rep. 6: 454–457

    Google Scholar 

  • Menard D, Coumans M & Gaspar T (1985) Micropropagation duPelargonium a partir de meristemes. Med. Fac. Landbouww, Rijksuniv. Gent 50(2A): 327–331

    Google Scholar 

  • Murashige T & Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and biossays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant. 15: 473–497

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollock K, Barfield DG & Shields R (1983) The toxicity of antibiotics to plant cell cultures. Plant Cell Rep. 2: 36–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabath LD, Gerstein DA & Finland M (1968) Enhanced activity of novobiocin against gram negativeBacilli in acid media. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother 398–404

  • Schaad NW (1980) A Laboratory Guide for the Indentification of Plant Pathogenic Bacteria. American Phytopathological Society, Minnesota

    Google Scholar 

  • Selwyn S (Ed) (1980) The Beta-lactam Antibiotics. Hodder and Stoughton, London, (pp 56–90)

    Google Scholar 

  • Severin K & Schoeffl (1990) Heat-inducible hygromycin-resistance in transgenic tobacco cell culture transformation usingAgrobacterium tumefaciens. Plant Mol. Biol. 15: 827–833

    Google Scholar 

  • Stead DE (1988) Identification of bacteria by computer assisted fatty acid profiling. Acta Hort. 225: 39–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurston KC, Spencer SJ & Arditti J (1979) Phytotoxicity of fungicides and bacteriosides in orchid culture media. Amer. J. Bot. 66: 825–835

    Google Scholar 

  • van den Mooter M, Swings J, Cleene MD, Lyons F & De Ley J (1981) Susceptibility ofXanthomonas towards antibioticsin vitro. Med. Fac. Landbouww. Rijksuniv. Gent. 46: 3

    Google Scholar 

  • Young RM, Hutchins AS & Canfield ML (1984) Use of antibiotics to control bacteria in shoot cultures of woody plants. Plant Sci. Lett. 34: 203–209

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barrett, C., Cassells, A.C. An evaluation of antibiotics for the elimination ofXanthomonas campestris pv.pelargonii (Brown) fromPelargonium x domesticum cv. ‘Grand Slam’ explants in vitro. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 36, 169–175 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00037716

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00037716

Key words

Navigation