Skip to main content
Log in

An energy approach to crack closure

  • Published:
International Journal of Fracture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Crack closure is analyzed using an energy approach whereby it is shown that crack closure does not completely shield the input mechanical energy to the crack tip at a load below the crack opening load P op if the compliance below P op is non-zero. An equivalent shielding stress intensity range is defined by the energy release rate against crack closure. From this energy standpoint, the true effective stress intensity range should be defined as ΔK eff=K max−χK op, where χ is the shielding factor. The conventional definition (ΔK eff=K maxK op) is equivalent to the new definition only when the compliance below P op is zero such that χ=1, i.e., for a fully closed crack. The corrected ΔK eff is found to be effective in correlating fatigue crack growth rates (FCGRs) generated in 8090-T8771 aluminum-lithium alloy with and without crack closure. In contrast, the conventional ΔK eff fails to reconcile the FCGR data within an acceptable scatter band.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. W. Elber, Engineering Fracture Mechanics 2 (1970) 37–45.

    Google Scholar 

  2. W. Elber, ASTM STP 486 (1970) 230–241.

  3. R.S. Vecchio, J.S. Crompton and R.W. Hertzberg, International Journal of Fracture 31 (1986) R29-R33.

    Google Scholar 

  4. R.W. Hertzberg, C.H. Newton and R. Jaccard, ASTM STP 982 (1988) 139–148.

  5. R. Murakami, Y-H Kim and W.G. Ferguson, Fatigue and Fracture of Engineering Materials and Structures 14 (1991) 741–748.

    Google Scholar 

  6. B.K. Parida and T. Nicholas, International Journal of Fracture 52 (1991) R51-R54.

    Google Scholar 

  7. R.E. Garz and M.N. James, International Journal of Fatigue 11 (1989) 437–440.

    Google Scholar 

  8. S.A. Seetharam and P.K. Dash, International Journal of Fracture 53 (1992) R53-R58.

    Google Scholar 

  9. N. Louat, K. Sadanada, M. Duesbery and A.K. Vasudevan, Metallurgical Transactions A 24 (1993) 2225–2232.

    Google Scholar 

  10. S. Suresh and R.O. Ritchie, in Fatigue Crack Growth Threshold Concepts, D. Davidson and S. Suresh (eds.) The Metallurgical Society of AIME (1984) 227–261.

  11. G.R. Irwin and J.E. Kies, Welding Journal 33 (1954) 193–198.

    Google Scholar 

  12. J.C. Newman, Jr., ASTM STP 637 (1977) 56–80.

  13. M.D. Raizenne, An MTS Basic 770 Computer Program for Automated Fatigue Crack Growth Rate Testing, NRC-LTR-ST 1538, National Research Council of Canada (1986).

  14. K.T. Venkateswara Rao, W. Wu and R.O. Ritchie, Metallurgical Transactions A 19A (1988) 563–568.

    Google Scholar 

  15. D.A. Hull, The Effect of Constant and Variable Amplitude Loading on Aluminum-Lithium Fatigue Crack Growth, Crack Deflection and Surface Roughness, IAR-CR-26, National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  16. X.J. Wu, W. Wallace, A.K. Koul and M.D. Raizanne, Metallurgical Transactions A (1995) in press.

  17. X.J. Wu, W. Wallace and A.K. Koul, Fatigue and Fracture of Engineering Structures and Materials 18 (1995) 833–845.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The Canadian Government's right to retain a non-exclusive, royalty-free licence in and to any copyright is acknowledged.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wu, X.J. An energy approach to crack closure. Int J Fract 73, 263–272 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00037647

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00037647

Keywords

Navigation