Skip to main content
Log in

Breeding and combining ability of heterostylous genotypes for hybrid seed production in Lycopersicon esculentum Mill

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

A subjective rating scale was used to select tomato inbreds with inserted stigmas (inserted) for crossing with inbreds possessing exserted stigmas (exserted) in a combining a bility study. Six inserted parents were inbred to F5 or F6, but were not stable for stigma position in most cases. The exserted x inserted hybrids were all slightly exserted and it appeared stigma exsertion was incompletely dominant to stigma insertion. No reciprocal cross differences were detected for stigma position indicating the absence of cytoplasmic inheritance. There was no clear relationship between hybrid stigma positions and the level of insertion of the inserted parents. Stigma insertion was more consistently detrimental to fruit set than was stigma exsertion. Hybrids were either heterotic or dominant for yield.

The inability to attain hybrids with standard stigma positions by crossing exserted x inserted genotypes could limit fruit-set under some environmental conditions. Furthermore, difficulty in breeding stable inserted lines and the incomplete dominance of exserted over inserted genotypes limits the feasibility of using heterostyly alone for producing reliable hybrids.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander Leonard J., Gene L. Oakes & Carol A. Jaberg, 1971. The production of two needed mutations in tomato by irradiation. J. Hered. 62: 311–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atanassova B., 1976. Inheritance studies on some components connected with exserted stigma in tomatoes and the influence of different environments on its manifestations. Tomato Genet. Coop. 26: 2–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atanassova B., 1977. Inheritance of the components connected with exserted stigma in tomato F2 and backcross generations. Tomato Genet. Coop. 27: 27–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrons Keith C., 1943. Spartan Hybrid-A first generation hybrid tomato for greenhouse production. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 42: 524–528.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop C. J., 1954. A stamenless male sterile tomato. Amer. J. Bot. 41: 540–542.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bukovac M. J. & S. Honma, 1967. Gibberellin induced heterostyly in the tomato and its implications for hybrid seed production. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 91: 514–520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burk Earl F., 1929. The role of pistil length in the development of forcing tomatoes. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 26: 239–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coyne Dermot P., 1968. Differential response of stylar elongation in tomatoes to soil moisture levels. HortScience 3: 39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Currence T. M., 1944. A combination or semi-sterility with two simply inherited characters that can be used to reduce the cost of hybrid tomato seed. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 44: 403–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffing B., 1952. Interaction of nutrition and heterosis in determining earliness. Tomato Genet. Coop. 2: 2–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howlett Freeman S., 1939. The modification of flower structure by environment in varieties of Lycopersicon esculentum. J. Agric. Res. 58: 79–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson R. E. & Sherman Paur, 1948. The description and inheritance of a functionally sterile flower mutant in tomato and its probable value in hybrid tomato seed production. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 52: 355–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer Arthur & N. D. Peacock, 1941. Heterosis in the tomato as determined by yield. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 38: 576–580.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ognyanova A., 1973. Inheritance of style and anther length and of exserted stigma in two tomato crosses. Tomato Genet. Coop. 23: 25–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rick Charles M., 1948. Field identification of genetically male-sterile tomato plants for use in producing F1 hybrid seed. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 52: 277–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rick Charles M. & Jeanette Robinson, 1951. Inherited effects of floral structure affects fruitfulness in Lycopersicon esculentum. Amer. J. Bot. 38: 639–652.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rick Charles M. & Wesley H. Dempsey, 1969. Position of the stigma in relation to fruit setting of the tomato. Bot. Gaz. 130: 180–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson R. W., W. Mishanec & S. Shannon, 1966. Fruit setting ability in relation to extreme temperature. Tomato Genet. Coop. 16: 33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruttencutter Glen E. & W. L. George, 1975. Genetics of stigma position. Tomato Genet. Coop. 25: 20–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith Ora, 1932. Relation of temperature to anthesis and blossom drop of the tomato, together with a histological study of the pistils. J. Agric. Res. 44: 183–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tikoo S. K. & A. B. Pal, 1976. A spontaneous mutant with exserted stigma in tomato. Tomato Genet. Coop. 26: 18–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams W., 1961. Environment and control of breeding system in tomato. Tomato Genet. Coop. 11: 27–28.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center Article No. 166-78.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Scott, J.W., George, W.L. Breeding and combining ability of heterostylous genotypes for hybrid seed production in Lycopersicon esculentum Mill . Euphytica 29, 135–144 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00037259

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00037259

Index words

Navigation