Summary
The weighted least squares (WLS) procedure has been widely used in the analysis of generation means in biometrical genetics. Two methods to carry out the analysis have been presented in the literature (Mather & Jinks, 1971; Rowe & Alexander, 1980). Neither method identified the factors that need to be taken into account when deciding which procedure to use. This paper examines the fitting of the additive-dominance model using the general principles of least squares analysis and presents the statistical basis of each procedure. Mather & Jink's method, which is more realistic according to genetic theory, is based on the assumption that the populations have nonhomogeneous variances. Rowe & Alexander's method is based on the assumption that the populations have homogeneous variances. In the latter case, there is actually no need to do a WLS analysis. The ordinary least square analysis using the original observations rather than the means, will produce the regression parameter estimates.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allard, R.W. & A.D.Bradshaw, 1964. Implications of genotype environmental interactions in applied plant breeding. Crop Sci. 4: 503–508.
Cavalli, L.L., 1952. An analysis of linkage in quantitative inheritance. In: E.C.R.Reeve & C.H.Waddington (Eds), Quantitative Inheritance. p. 135–144. HMSO, London.
Draper, N.R. & H. Smith, 1966. Applied regression analysis. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Falconer, D.S., 1981. Introduction to quantitative genetics. 2nd ed. Longman, London and New York.
Mather, K. & J.L.Jinks, 1971. Biometrical genetics. Cornell Univ. Press, Ithaca, N.Y.
Rowe, K.E. & W.L.Alexander, 1980. Computations for estimating the genetic parameters in joint-scaling tests. Crop Sci. 20: 109–110.
Snedecor, G.W. & W.G. Cochran, 1980. Statistical Methods. 7th ed. Iowa State Univ. Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Beaver, R.J., Mosjidis, J.A. Important considerations in the analysis of generation means. Euphytica 39, 233–235 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00037101
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00037101