Skip to main content
Log in

Origin of maize: The tripartite hypothesis

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The oldest known archaeological race of maize is a pod-popcorn. The closest living wild relative of cultivated maize is teosinte. Although the morphological differences between maize and teosinte are spectacular in appearance they are conspecific genetically. The tripartite hypotheses proposes that the ancestor of domesticated maize was a now extinct wild pod-popcorn; that teosinte originated from maize-Tripsacum hybridization; and that introgression with either teosinte or Tripsacum gave rise to the tripsacoid syndrome characteristic of many modern races of maize. Maize and teosinte cross readily, and exchange genes wherever they are sympatric. Hybrids between maize and Tripsacum are not always easy to produce, but natural introgression between these taxa is possible. However, artificially induced introgression from Tripsacum into maize failed to produce either teosinte-like offspring or the combination of tripsacoid characteristics assumed to indicate such introgression during the evolution of several South American races of maize. The available archaeological data seem to exclude teosinte as a possible ancestor of domesticated maize. This will make maize the only cereal without a living direct ancestor. Biosystematic studies suggest that teosinte is so closely related to domesticated maize that it could be accepted as the progenitor of maize.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, E. & Erickson, R. O., 1941. Antithetical dominance in North American maize. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. 27:436–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ascherson, P., 1875. Ueber Euchlaena mexicana Schrad. Bot. Vereins Brandenburg 17:76–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barghoorn, E. S., Wolfe, M. K. & Clisby, K. H., 1954. Fossil maize from the Valley of Mexico. Bot. Mus. Leafl. Harvard Univ. 16:229–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, A. S., Barghoorn, E. S. & Berger, R., 1969. Fossil maize from Panama. Science 165: 389–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beadle, G. W., 1939. Teosinte and the origin of maize. J. Hered. 30:245–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandolini, A., 1970. Maize. In: O. M. Frankel & E. Bennett (Ed.), Genetic resources in plants. I.B.P. Handbook No 11.

  • Chaganti, R. S. K., 1965. Cytogenetic studies of maize-Tripsacum hybrids and their derivatives. Ph. D. thesis, Bussey Inst. Harvard Univ. Publ., Cambridge.

  • Colin, S. M., 1966. Discussion sobre el origen y la evolucion del maiz. Mem. Segundo Congr. Nac. Fitogen. Mexico 1966:233–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, G. N. & Kempton, J. H., 1920. A teosinte maize hybrid. J. agric. Res. 19:1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutler, H. C. & Anderson, E., 1941. A preliminary survey of the genus Tripsacum. Ann. Mo. bot. Gard. 28:249–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darlington, C. D., 1956. Natural populations and the breakdown of classical genetics. Proc. R. Soc. Bot. Lond. 145:350–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Wet, J. M. J., Harlan, J. R., Lambert, R. J. & Engle, L. M., 1972. Introgression from Tripsacum into Zea and the origin of maize. Carologia 25 (in press).

  • De, Wet, J. M. J., Harlan, J. R., & Grant, C. A., 1971. Origin and evolution of teosinte (Zea mexicana (Schrad.) Kuntze). Euphytica 20:255–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • De, Wet, J. M. J., Lambert, R. J., Harlan, J. R. & Naik, S. M., 1970. Stable triploid hybrids among Zea-Tripsacum-Zea backcross populations. Caryologia 23:183–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • East, E. M., 1913. A chronicle of the tribe of corn. Pop. Sci. mon. 82:225–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galinat, W. C., 1963. Form and function of plant structures in the American Maydeae and their significance for breeding. Econ. Bot. 17:51–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galinat, W. C., 1970. The cupule and its role in the origin and evolution of maize. Bull. agric. Exp. Stn Univ. Mass. 585.

  • Galinat, W. C., Chaganti, R. S. K. & Hager, F. D., 1964. Tripsacum as a possible amphidiploid of wild maize and Manisuris. Bot. Mus. Leafl. Harvard Univ. 20:289–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, M. M., 1965. The history and origin of maize. Tech. Bull. N. Carolina agric. Exp. Stn 170.

  • Harlan, J. R. & De, Wet, J. M. J., 1971. Towards a rational classification of cultivated plants. Taxon 19:509–517.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harshberger, J. W., 1893. Maize, a botanical and economical study. Cont. bot. Lab. Univ. Pa. 1:75–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harshberger, J. W., 1896. Fertile crosses of teosinte and maize. Gard. Forest 9:522–523.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernandez, X. E. & L. F. Randolph, 1959. Description de Los Tripsacum diploides de Mexico; Tripsacum maizar y Tripsacum zopilotense Spp. Nov. Ofic. Estud. Esp. Sag. Fol. Tec. No. 4.

  • Hitchcock. A. S., 1950. Manual of the grasses of the United States. Misc. Publ. U. S. Dept. Agric. 200.

  • Irwin, H. & Barghoorn, E. S., 1965. Identification of the pollen of maize, teosinte, and Tripsacum by phase contrast microscopy. Bot. Mus. Leafl. Harvard Univ. 21:37–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longham, D. G., 1940. The inheritance of intergeneric differences in Zea-Euchlaena hybrids. Genetics 25:85–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longley, A. E., 1941. Chromosome morphology in maize and its relatives. Bot. Rev. 7:263–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurtz, E. B., Tucker, H. & Liverman, J. L., 1960. Some problems concerning fossil and modern corn pollen. Bull. Torr. Bot. Club 87:85–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyte, K., 1578. Dodoens Niewe Herbal nowe first translated out of French into English. London.

  • Maguire, M. P., 1961. Divergence in Tripsacum and Zea chromosomes. Evolution 15:394–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacNeish, R. S., 1955. Ancient maize in Mexico. Archaeol. 8:108–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacNeish, R. S., 1967. Introduction. In: D. S., Byers (Ed.), The prehistory of the Tehuacan Valley, Vol. 1. Texas University Press, Austin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangelsdorf, P. C., 1947. The origin and evolution of maize. Adv. Genet. 1:161–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangelsdorf, P. C., 1948. The role of pod corn in the origin and evolution of maize. Ann. Mo. bot. Gard. 35:377–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangelsdorf, P. C., 1958. Ancester of corn. Proc. Am. phil. Soc. 102:454–463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangelsdorf, P. C., 1961. Introgression in maize. Euphytica 10:157–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangelsdorf, P. C., 1965. The evolution of maize. In: Sir Joseph Hutchinson (Ed.), Essays on crop plant evolution. Cambridge University Press.

  • Mangelsdorf, P. C., Dick, H. W. & Camara-Hernandez, J., 1967a. Bat Cave revisited. Bot. Mus. Leafl. Harvard Univ. 22:1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangelsdorf, P. C. & Lister, R. H., 1956. Archaeological evidence on the evolution of maize in northwestern Mexico. Bot. Mus. Leafl. Harvard Univ. 17:151–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangelsdorf, P. C., MacNeish, R. S. & Galinat, W. C., 1956. Archaeological evidence on the diffusion and evolution of maize in northeastern Mexico. Bot. Mus. Leafl. Harvard Univ. 17:125–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangelsdorf, P. C., MacNeish, R. S. & Galinat, W. C., 1964. Domestication of corn. Science 143:538–545.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangelsdorf, P. C., MacNeish, R. S. & Galinat, W. C., 1967b. Prehistoric wild and cultivated maize. In: D. S., Byers (Ed.), The prehistory of the Tehuacan Valley, Vol. 1, Chap. 9. Texas University Press, Austin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangelsdorf, P. C., MacNeish, R. S. & Galinat, W. C., 1967c. Prehistoric maize, teosinte and Tripsacum from Tamaulipas, Mexico, Bot. Mus. Leafl. Harvard Univ. 22:33–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangelsdorf, P. C. & Reeves, R. G., 1939. The origin of Indian corn and its relatives. Bull. Texas agric. Exp. Stn 574.

  • Mangelsdorf, P. C., & Reeves, R. G., 1959a. The origin of corn. I. Pod corn, the ancestral form. Bot. Mus. Leafl. Harvard Univ. 18:329–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangelsdorf, P. C. & Reeves, R. G., 1959. The origin of corn. III. Modern races, the product of teosinte introgression. Bot. Mus. Leafl. Harvard Univ. 18:389–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangelsdorf, P. C. & Reeves, R. G., 1959c. The origin of corn. IV. Place and time of origin. Bot. Mus. Leafl. Harvard Univ. 18:413–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Randolph, L. F., 1959. The origin of maize. Ind. J. Genet. Pl. Breed. 19:1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Randolph, L. F., 1970. Variation among Tripsacum populations of Mexico and Guatemala. Brittonia 22:305–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeves, R. G., 1953. Comparative morphology of the American Maydeae. Bull. Texas agric. Exp. Stn 761.

  • Reeves, R. G. & Mangeldorf, P. C., 1959a. The origin of corn. II. Teosinte, a hybrid of corn and Tripsacum. Bot. Mus. Leafl. Harvard Univ. 18:357–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeves, R. G. & Mangelsdorf, P. C., 1959b. The origin of corn. V. A critique of current theories. Bot. Mus. Leafl. Harvard Univ. 18:428–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowley, J. R., 1960. The exine structure of ‘Cereal’ and ‘Wild’ type grass pollen. Grana palynol. 2:9–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tantravahi, R. V., 1971. Multiple character analysis and chromosome studies in the Tripsacum lanceolatum complex. Evolution 25:38–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weatherwax, P., 1955. History and origin of corn. I. Early history of corn and theories as to its origin. In: G. F., Sprague (Ed.), Corn and corn improvement. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellhausen, E. J., Roberts, L. M. & Hernandez, E. X., 1952. Races of maize in Mexico. Bussey Inst. Harvard Univ. Publ. Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkes, H. G., 1967. Teosinte: The closest relative of maize. Ph. D. thesis, Bussey Inst. Harvard Univ. Publ. Cambridge.

  • Wilkes, H. G., 1970. Teosinte introgression in the maize of the Nobogame Valley, Bot. Mus. Leafl. Harvard Univ. 22:297–311.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Supported in part financially by the Illinois Agricultural Experiment Station, and Grant GB-28495 from the National Science Foundation.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

De Wet, J.M.J., Harlan, J.R. Origin of maize: The tripartite hypothesis. Euphytica 21, 271–279 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00036767

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00036767

Keywords

Navigation