Skip to main content
Log in

Factors affecting adventitious bud induction in Pinus elliottii (Engelm.) embryos cultured in vitro

  • Published:
Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Embryos of slash pine (Pinus elliottii Engelm.) were induced to form adventitious buds when placed in culture on nutrient media supplemented with cytokinin. Buds were induced on media containing Risser & White major salts. The high content in nitrogen of Murashige & Skoog formulation seems to be deleterious for this in vitro system, since morphogenic responses were only promoted when nitrogen concentration was drastically reduced in the macronutrient formulation. Factors such as concentration of cytokinin (6-benzyladenine) and time and method of exposure (liquid or solid induction medium) strongly influenced bud formation and development. The greatest number of buds and shoots were obtained from 22.0 μM cytokinin, but these shoots showed less and slower development than those induced with low dosages of cytokinin. The presence of naphthaleneacetic acid in combination with cytokinin in the induction medium decreased the frequency of bud formation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

(BA):

6-benzyladenine

(NAA):

1-naphthaleneacetic acid

References

  1. Campbell RA, Durzan DJ (1975) Induction of multiple buds and needles in tissue cultures of Picea glauca. Can J Bot 53: 1652–1657

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chalupa V (1983) Micropropagation of conifer and broadleaved forest trees. Commun Inst For Cech 13: 7–39

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cheah KT, Cheng TY (1978) Histological analysis of adventitious bud formation in cultured Douglas fir cotyledon. Am J Bot 65: 845–849

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cheng TY (1977) Factors affecting adventitious bud formation on cotyledon culture of Douglas fir. Plant Sci Lett 9: 179–187

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cheng TY, Voqui TH (1977) Regeneration of Douglas fir plantlets through tissue culture. Science 198: 306–307

    Google Scholar 

  6. David A (1982) In vitro propagation of gymnosperms. In: Bonga JM, Durzan DJ (eds) Tissue culture in forestry. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff/Dr W Junk, pp 72–108

    Google Scholar 

  7. Eriksson T, Fridborg G, vonArnold S (1977) Tissue and cell culture of forest trees as a tool of vegetative propagation. In: Vegetative propagation of forest trees: physiology and practice Uppsala: The Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, pp 17–26

    Google Scholar 

  8. Flinn BS, Webb DT, Georgis W (1986) In vitro control of caulogenesis by growth regulators and media components in embryonic explants of eastern white pine (Pinus strobus). Can J Bot 64: 1948–1956

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gresshoff PM, Doy CH (1972) Development and differentiation of haploid Lycopersicon esculentum (tomato). Planta 107: 101–107

    Google Scholar 

  10. Isikawa H (1974) In vitro formation of adventitious buds and roots on the hypocotyl of Cryptomeria japonica. Bot Mag 87: 73–77

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jansson E, Bornman C (1980) In vitro phyllomorphic regeneration of shoot buds and shoots in Picea abies. Physiol Plant 49: 105–111

    Google Scholar 

  12. Konar RN, Singh MH (1980) Induction of shoot buds from tissue cultures of Pinus wallichiana. Z Pflanzenphysiol 99: 173–177

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mott RL (1979) Tissue culture propagation of conifers. In: Hughes KW, Henke R, Constantin M (eds) Propagation of higher plants through tissue culture. A bridge between research and application. Springfield: Conf 7804111 Nat Tech Inf Serv, pp 125–133

  14. Mudge KW (1986) Micropropagation of mugo pine from embryonic and seedling explants. HortScience 21: 298–299

    Google Scholar 

  15. Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15: 473–497

    Google Scholar 

  16. Patel KR, Thorpe TA (1984) In vitro differentiation of plantlets from embryonic explants of lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta Dougl. ex Loud.). Plant Cell Tissue Organ Culture 3: 131–142

    Google Scholar 

  17. Reilly K, Washer J (1977) Vegetative propagation of radiata pine by tissue culture plantlet formation from embryonic tissue. N Z J For Sci 7: 199–206

    Google Scholar 

  18. Risser PG, White PR (1964) Nutritional requirements of spruce tumor cells in vitro. Physiol Plant 17: 620–635

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sommer HE, Brown CL (1979) Application of tissue culture to forest tree improvement. In: Sharp WR, Larsen PO, Paddock EF, Raghavan V (eds) Plant, cell and tissue culture —Principles and applications. Columbus, Ohio: State University Press, pp 461–491

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sommer HE, Brown CL (1980) Embryogenesis in tissue culture of sweetgum. For Sci 26: 257–260

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sommer HE, Brown CL, Kormanik P (1975) Differentiation of plantlets in longleaf pine (Pinus palustris Mill.) tissue cultured in vitro. Bot Gaz 136: 196–200

    Google Scholar 

  22. Webb KJ, Street HE (1977) Morphogenesis in vitro of Pinus and Picea. Acta Hortic 78: 259–269

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pérez-Bermúdez, P., Sommer, H.E. Factors affecting adventitious bud induction in Pinus elliottii (Engelm.) embryos cultured in vitro. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 11, 25–35 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00036573

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00036573

Key words

Navigation