Advertisement

Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture

, Volume 23, Issue 2, pp 135–142 | Cite as

Relationship between calcium and agar on vitrification and shoot-tip necrosis of quince (Cydonia oblonga Mill.) shoots in vitro

  • Suman Singha
  • Edwin C. Townsend
  • Gene H. Oberly
Article

Abstract

Shoot-tip cultures of Quince C (Cydonia oblonga Mill.) initiated on Murashige & Skoog (MS) medium containing 5 μM BA and 0.6% Phytagar showed both shoot-tip necrosis and severe vitrification. Culturing explants on medium containing 1.2% Phytagar and Ca levels of 3 mM (MS medium), 18 mM and 30 mM showed a decrease in growth with increasing medium Ca levels, being especially severe at 30 mM. The Ca content of the explants increased linearly with increasing medium Ca. Culturing explants on medium containing 3 mM, 9 mM, and 18 mM Ca at 0.6, 0.9, and 1.2% agar resulted in reduction in growth, shoot-tip necrosis, and vitrification when either factor was increased. The reduction in shoot-tip necrosis could be accounted for primarily by an increase in medium Ca levels but may also be affected by a change in explant growth. Increasing Ca concentration in the medium resulted in a linear increase in explant K, Ca, Mg, and B levels and a decrease in Mn and Na. Although increasing medium Ca or agar levels reduced vitrification, it is unclear whether they were the direct cause of the reduction in vitrification or whether this response was an effect of the reduction in culture fresh weight.

Key words

agar calcium cydonia mineral nutrition tissue culture 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Daguin F & Letouzé R (1985) Relations entre hypolignification et état vitreux chez Salix babylonica en culture in vitro. Rôle de la nutrition ammoniacale. Can. J. Bot. 63: 325–326Google Scholar
  2. Debergh PC (1983) Effect of agar brand and concentration on the tissue culture medium. Physiol. Plant. 59: 270–276Google Scholar
  3. Debergh P, Harbaoui Y & Lemeur R (1981) Mass propagation of globe artichoke (Cynara scolymus): Evaluation of different hypothesis to overcome vitrification with special reference to water potential. Physiol. Plant. 53: 181–187Google Scholar
  4. Debergh P & Maene L (1984) Pathological and physiological problems related to the in vitro culture of plants. Parasitica 40: 69–75Google Scholar
  5. Durand-Cresswell R, Boulay M & Franclet A (1982) Vegetative propagation of eucalyptus. In: Bonga J & Durzan D (Eds) Tissue Culture in Forestry (pp 150–181). Martinus Nijhoff/Dr. W. Junk Publishers, The HagueGoogle Scholar
  6. Kevers C, Coumans M, Coumans-Gilles MF & Gaspar T (1984) Physiological and biochemical events leading to vitrification of plants cultured in vitro Physiol. Plant. 61: 69–74Google Scholar
  7. Kevers C & Gaspar T (1986) Vitrification of carnation in vitro: changes in water content, intracellular space, air volume and ion levels. Physiol. Vég. 24: 647–653Google Scholar
  8. Murashige T & Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant. 15: 473–497Google Scholar
  9. Orlikowska T (1987) Vitrification problems in the in vitro culture of fruit tree rootstocks. Acta Hortic. 212: 239–244Google Scholar
  10. Paques M & Boxus Ph (1987) ‘Vitrification’: review of literature. Acta Hortic. 212: 155–166Google Scholar
  11. Pasqualetto PL, Zimmerman RH & Fordham I (1988a) Influence of cations and gelling agent concentrations on vitrification of apple cultivars in vitro. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 14: 31–40Google Scholar
  12. Pasqualetto PL, Wergin WP & Zimmerman RH (1988b) Changes in the structure and elemental composition of vitrified leaves of ‘Gala’ apple in vitro. Acta Hortic. 227: 352–357Google Scholar
  13. Quoirin M & Lepoivre P (1977) Etude de milieux adaptés aux cultures in vitro de Prunus. Acta Hortic. 78: 437–442Google Scholar
  14. Sha L, McCown BH & Peterson LA (1985) Occurrence and cause of shoot-tip necrosis in shoot cultures. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 110: 631–634Google Scholar
  15. Singha S (1982) Influence of agar concentration on in vitro shoot proliferation of Malus sp. ‘Almey’ and Pyrus communis ‘Seckel’. J Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 107: 657–660Google Scholar
  16. Singha S, Oberly GH & Townsend EC (1987) Changes in nutrient composition and pH of the culture medium during in vitro shoot proliferation of crabapple and pear. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 11: 209–220Google Scholar
  17. Singha S, Townsend EC & Oberly GH (1985) Mineral nutrient status of crabapple and pear shoots cultured in vitro on varying concentrations of three commercial agars. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 110: 407–411Google Scholar
  18. Yang Q, Read PE, Fellman CD & Hosier MA (1985) Effect of medium constituents and rooting regime on in vitro cultures of Castanea mollissima and C. dentata. HortScience 20: 593 (Abstract)Google Scholar
  19. Zimmerman TW, Rogers SMD & Cobb BG (1988) Physiological differences between normal and vitreous petunias grown in vitro. ASHS/CSHS 1988 Ann Mtg. East Lansing, Mich, Prog & Abstr. HortScience 23: 780 (Abstract)Google Scholar
  20. Ziv M, Meir G & Halevy A (1983) Factors influencing the production of hardened glaucous carnation plantlets in vitro. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 2: 55–65Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Suman Singha
    • 1
  • Edwin C. Townsend
    • 1
  • Gene H. Oberly
    • 2
  1. 1.Division of Plant and Soil SciencesWest Virginia UniversityMorgantownUSA
  2. 2.Department of PomologyCornell UniversityIthacaUSA

Personalised recommendations