Skip to main content
Log in

The importance of photoperiodic response for the breeding of glasshouse spinach

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Very quick-growing spinach material has been raised for winter cropping in glasshouses by crossing some glasshouse varieties with an extremely quick-bolting parent and subsequent selection in winter glasshouse crops. The resulting material gave increased leaf production in winter cropping under glass and did not bolt too rapidly.

The procedure used was based on the observation that leaf growth is optimal under a daylength corresponding with the critical daylength for bolting. The critical daylength of the current spinach varieties is longer than the daylengths under which winter crops are grown, so the rate of growth is not optimal.

This paper also demonstrates how any other growth-accelerating properties than a particular critical daylength can be traced and used for breeding purposes.

The importance of this ecological basis for breeding, growing and variety testing is pointed out and exemplified.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anonymous, 1970. 22e Rassenlijst voor Groentegewassen. Wageningen, Inst. Vered. Tuinb. Gewass.

  • Huyskes, J. A. 1962. Cold requirements of witloof chicory varieties (Cichoricum intybus L.) as a yield determining factor. Euphytica 11: 36–41; Meded. Inst. Vered. TuinbGwass. Wageningen, 180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kopetz, L. 1937a Untersuchungen über den Einfluss des Lichtfaktors auf Wachstum und Entwicklung einiger sommerannuellen Pflanzen. Gartenbauwissenschaft 10: 354–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kopetz, L., 1937b. Die Bedeutung des Tageslängenfaktors für die Beurteilung der Blühreifesommerannueller Pflanzen, Züchter 9: 181–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuizinga, J. et al., 1953. De zaadteelt van spinazie. Cent. Inst. LandbOnderz. Gestenc. Meded. 16.

  • Moshkov, E. S., 1940. On critical and optimal photoperiods. Sov. Bot. 4: 32–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oorschot, J. L. van, 1960. Effects of daylength upon growth and development of spinach (Spinacia oleracea L) Meded. LandbHogesch. Wageningen 60 (18): 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parlevliet, J. E., 1967. Influence of external factors on the growth and development of spinach cultivars. Meded. LandbHogesch. Wageningen, 67 (2): 1–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P. G., 1950. Downy mildew immunity in spinach. Phytopathology 40: 65–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sneep, J., 1957. De stand van de veredeling bij spinazie Proefschrift Landb. Hogesch. Meded. Inst. Vered. TuinbGewass. Wageningen, 113.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Huyskes, J.A. The importance of photoperiodic response for the breeding of glasshouse spinach. Euphytica 20, 371–379 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00035662

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00035662

Keywords

Navigation