Photosynthesis Research

, Volume 31, Issue 3, pp 195–212

Anatomy of non-uniform leaf photosynthesis

  • Ichiro Terashima
Minireview

Abstract

Since 1986, non-uniform photosynthesis over the leaf area that may be attributed to patchy stomatal closure, has been an important issue in stress physiology of photosynthesis. In this review, I first outline the gaseous environment within the intercellular spaces, because this is the most fundamental background of this problem. Then, recent studies approaching non-uniform photosynthesis are reviwed. After examining techniques for the detection of non-uniform photosynthesis or non-uniform stomatal aperture, results of the relevant studies are discussed for respective stress factors, seeking causes and consequences of non-uniform photosynthesis. From these, mechanisms responsible for, and consequences of non-uniform photosynthesis, are considered. The problems which should be challenged are also pointed out.

Key words

bundle sheath extension gas diffusion gas exchange heterobaric and homobaric leaves stomata stress 

Abbreviations

A

rate of photosynthetic CO2 fixation (assimilation rate)

ABA

abscisic acid

g

conductance for CO2 or H2O

pa

partial pressure of CO2 in the ambient air

pi

partial pressure of CO2 in the intercellular space

‘pi

pi estimated by the conventional gas exchange techniques

qN

non-photochemical quenching

qp

photochemical quenching

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alvim PT and Havis JR (1954) An improved infiltration series for studying stomatal opening as illustrated with coffee. Plant Physiol 29: 97–98Google Scholar
  2. Asada K and Takahashi M (1987) Production and scavenging of active oxygen in photosynthesis. In: Kyle DJ, Osmond CB and Arntzen CJ (eds) Photoinhibition, pp 227–287. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  3. Ben GY, Osmond CB and Sharkey TD (1987) Comparisons of photosynthetic responses of Xanthium strumarium and Helianthus annuus to chronic and acute water stress in sun and shade. Plant Physiol 84: 476–481Google Scholar
  4. Beyschlag W and Pfanz H (1990) A fast method to detect the occurrence of nonhomogeneous distribution of stomatal aperture in heterobaric plant leaves. Experiments with Arbutus unedo L. during the diurnal course. Oecologia 82: 52–55Google Scholar
  5. Björkman O (1989) Some viewpoints on photosynthetic response and adaptation to environmental stress. In: Briggs WR (ed) Photosynthesis, pp 45–58. Alan R Liss. New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Bongi G (1990) A gas exchange procedure to evaluate non-uniform stomatal closure effects in single mesophyte evergreen leaves under high vpd. In: Baltscheffsky M (ed) Current Research in Photosynthesis, Vol IV, pp 717–720. Kluwer Academic, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  7. Bradbury M and Baker NR (1981) Analysis of the slow phases of the in vivo chlorophyll fluorescence induction curve. Biochim Biophys Acta 63: 542–551Google Scholar
  8. Brugnoli E and Lauteri M (1991) Effects of salinity on stomatal conductance, photosynthetic capacity, and carbon isotope discrimination of salt tolerant (Gossypium hirsutum L.) and salt-sensitive (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) C3 non-halophytes. Plant Physiol 95: 628–635Google Scholar
  9. Bunce J (1987) Species-specific responses to water stress of gas exchange parameters mimicked by applied abscisic acid. Can J Bot 65: 103–106Google Scholar
  10. Caemmerer Svon and Farquhar GD (1981) Some relationship between the biochemistry and gas exchange of leaves. Planta 99: 347–351Google Scholar
  11. Canny MJ (1986) Water pathway in wheat leaves. III. The passage of mestome sheath and the function of the suberized lamellae. Physiol Plant 66: 637–647Google Scholar
  12. Canny MJ (1990) What becomes of the transpiration stream? New Phytol 114: 341–368Google Scholar
  13. Cheeseman JM (1991) PATCHY — simulating and visualizing the effects of stomatal patchiness on photosynthetic CO2 exchange studies. Plant Cell Environ 14: 593–599Google Scholar
  14. Cornic G, LeGouallec J-L, Briantais JM and Hodges M (1989) Effects of dehydration and high light on photosynthesis of two C3 plants (Phaseolus vulgaris L. and Elatostemma repens (Lour.) Hall f.) Planta 177: 84–90Google Scholar
  15. Daley PF, Raschke K, Ball JT and Berry JA (1989) Topography of photosynthetic activity of leaves obtained from video images of chlorophyll fluorescence. Plant Physiology 90: 1233–1238Google Scholar
  16. Day TA, Heckathorn SA and DeLucia EH (1991) Limitation of photosynthesis in Pinus taeda L. (loblolly pine) at low soil temperature. Plant Physiol 96: 1246–1254Google Scholar
  17. Delieu T and Walker DA (1981) Polarographic measurement of photosynthetic O2 evolution by leaf discs. New Phytol 89: 165–175Google Scholar
  18. Downton WJS, Loveys BR and Grant WJR (1988a) Stomatal closure fully accounts for the inhibition of photosynthesis by abscisic acid. New Phytol 108: 263–266.Google Scholar
  19. Downton WJS, Loveys BR and Grant WJR (1988b) Nonuniform stomatal closure induced by water stress causes putative non-stomatal inhibition of photosynthesis. New Phytol 110: 503–509Google Scholar
  20. Dubbe DR, Farquhar GD and Raschke K (1978) Effects of abscisic acid on the gain of the feedback loop involving carbon and stomata. Plant Physiol 62: 413–417Google Scholar
  21. Edwards G and Walker DA (1983) C3, C4: Mechanisms, and Cellular and Environmental Regulation of Photosynthesis. Blackswell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  22. Ellenson JL (1985) Phytoluminographic detection of dynamic variations in leaf gaseous conductivity. Plant Physiol 78: 904–908Google Scholar
  23. Ellenson JL and Amundson RG (1982) Delayed light imaging for the early detection of plant stress. Science 215: 1104–1106Google Scholar
  24. Esau K (1965) Plant Anatomy, 2nd edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. Farquhar GD (1989) Models of integrated photosynthesis of cells and leaves. Phil Trans R Soc London B 323: 357–367Google Scholar
  26. Farquhar GD and Caemmerer Svon (1982) Modelling of photosynthesis response to environmental conditions. In: Lange OL, Nobel PS, Osmond CB and Ziegler H (eds) Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology, New Series. Vol 12A, pp 549–587. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  27. Farquhar GD and Raschke K (1978) On the resistance to transpiration of the sites of evaporation within the leaf. Plant Physiol 61: 1000–1005Google Scholar
  28. Farquhar GD and Sharkey TD (1982) Stomatal conductance and photosynthesis. Annu Rev Plant Physiol 33: 317–345Google Scholar
  29. Farquhar GD, Caemmerer Svon and Berry JA (1980) A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 species. Planta 149: 78–90Google Scholar
  30. Farquhar GD Hubick KT, Terashima I, Condon AG and Richard RA (1987) Genetic variation in the relationship between photosynthetic CO2 assimilation rate and stomatal conductance to water loss. In: Briggs J (ed) Progress in Photosynthesis Research, Vol. IV, pp 5. 209–212. Martinus Nijhoff, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  31. Fischer E, Raschke K and Stitt M (1986) Effects of abscisic acid on photosynthesis in whole leaves: Changes in CO2 assimilation, levels of carbon-reduction cycle intermediates, and activity of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase. Planta 169: 536–545Google Scholar
  32. Flanagan LB and Jefferies RL (1989a) Photosynthetic and stomatal responses of the halophyte, Plantago maritima L. to fluctuations in salinity. Plant Cell Environ 12: 559–568Google Scholar
  33. Flanagan LB and Jefferies RL (1989b) Effects of increased salinity on CO2 assimilation, O2 evolution on CO2 assimilation, O2 evolution and σ 13C values of leaves of Plantago maritima L. developed at low and high NaCl levels. Planta 178: 377–384Google Scholar
  34. Gaastra P (1959) Photosynthesis of crop plants as influenced by light, carbon dioxide, temperature and stomatal diffusion resistance. Mededel Landbouwhogeschool Wageningen 59: 1–68Google Scholar
  35. Graan T and Boyer JS (1990) Very high CO2 partially restores photosynthesis in sunflower at low water potentials. Planta 181: 378–384Google Scholar
  36. Harazono Y and Yabuki K (1982) Studies on the effects of the leaf boundary layer resistance on the matter production of crop. (2) Distribution of the photosynthetic rate caused by the local difference in the boundary layer structures of individual leaves. J Agr Met 38: 231–238Google Scholar
  37. Hashimoto Y, Ino T, Kramer PJ, Naylor AW and Strain BR (1984) Dynamic analysis of water stress of sunflower leaves by means of a thermal image processing system. Plant Physiol 76: 266–269Google Scholar
  38. Hirasawa T, Ishikawa S, Touya S and Ishihara K (1991) Differences in the response to drought among sunflower plants grown under different conditions. II. Factors relating to the difference in the death of leaves. Jpn J Crop Sci 60 (Extra I): 148–149Google Scholar
  39. Ishihara K, Nishihara T and Ogura T (1971) The relationship between environmental factors and behaviour of stomata in the rice plant. 1. On the measurement of the stomatal aperture. Proc Jpn Soc Crop Sci 40: 491–496Google Scholar
  40. Jarmann PD (1974) The diffusion of carbon dioxide and water vapor through stomata. J Exp Bot 25: 927–936Google Scholar
  41. Kaiser WM (1987a) Non-stomatal, primary dehydration effects on photosynthesis: Possible mechanisms for reversible and irreversible damage. Curr Topics Plant Biochem Physiol 6: 119–133Google Scholar
  42. Kaiser WM (1987b) Effects of water deficit on photosynthetic capacity. Physiol Plant 71: 142–149Google Scholar
  43. Kappen L, Andresen G and Lösch R (1987) In situ observation of stomatal movements. J Exp Bot 38: 126–141Google Scholar
  44. Keck RW and Boyer JS (1974) Chloroplast response to low leaf water potentials. III. Differing inhibition of electron transport and photophosphorylation. Plant Physiol 53: 474–479Google Scholar
  45. Koike T, Tabuchi R, Fujimura Y, Takahashi K, Yuba Y, Nagasaka H and Koono K (1990) Photosynthetic characteristics of Japanese beech in summer. Proc Jpn Soc For Hokkaido Branch 38: 20–22Google Scholar
  46. Krause GH and Cornic G (1987) CO2 and O2 interactions in photoinhibition. In: Kyle DJ, Osmond CB and Arntzen CJ (eds) Photoinhibition, pp 169–196. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  47. Laisk A (1983) Calculation of leaf photosynthetic parameters considering the statistical distribution of stomatal apertures. J Exp Bot 34: 1627–1635Google Scholar
  48. Laisk A, Oja V and Kull K (1980) Statistical distribution of stomatal apertures of Vicia faba and Hordeum vulgare and the Spannungsphase of stomatal opening. J Exp Bot 31: 49–58Google Scholar
  49. Lange OL (1988) Ecophysiology of photosynthesis: Performance of poikilohydric lichens and homoiohydric Mediterranean schlerophylls. J Ecol 76: 915–937Google Scholar
  50. Leuning R (1983) Transport of gases into leaves. Plant Cell Environ 6: 369–380Google Scholar
  51. Long SP, Bolhár-Nordenkampf HR, Croft SL, Farage PK, Lechner E and Nugawela A (1989a) Analysis of spatial variation in CO2 uptake within the intact leaf and its significance in interpreting the effects of environmental stress on photosynthesis. Phil Trans R Soc London B 323: 385–395Google Scholar
  52. Long SP, Farage PK, Bolhár-Nordenkampf HR and Rohrhofer U (1989b) Separating the contribution of the upper and lower mesophyll to photosynthesis in Zea mays L. leaves. Planta 177: 207–216Google Scholar
  53. Loreto F and Sharkey TD (1990) Low humidity can cause uneven photosynthesis in olive (Olea Europaea L.) leaves. Tree Physiol 6: 409–415Google Scholar
  54. Mansfield TA, Hetherington AM and Atkinson CJ (1990) Some current aspects of stomatal physiology. Annu Rev Plant Physiol 41: 55–75Google Scholar
  55. Mawson BT, Colman B and Commins WR (1981) Abscisic acid and photosynthesis in isolated leaf mesophyll cells. Plant Physiol 67: 233–236Google Scholar
  56. Meidner H (1986) Cuticular conductance and the humidity response of stomata. J Exp Bot 37: 517–525Google Scholar
  57. Meidner H and Mansfield TA (1968) Physiology of Stomata. McGraw Hill, MeidenheadGoogle Scholar
  58. Michaek G (1969) Eine Methode zur Bestimmung der Spaltöffnungsweite von Koniferen. Flora 159: 559–561Google Scholar
  59. Molisch H (1912) Das Offen- und Geschlossensein der Spaltöffnungen, veranschaulicht durch eine neue Methode (Infiltrations-methode). Z Bot 4: 106–122Google Scholar
  60. Molisch H (1914) Uber die Herstellung von Photographien in einem Laubblatte. Sitsber Akad Wiss Wien 123 I: 923–930Google Scholar
  61. Moss DN and Rasmussen HP (1969) Cellular localization of CO2 fixation and translocation of metabolites. Plant Physiol 44: 1063–1068.Google Scholar
  62. Mott KA and O'Leary JW (1984) Stomatal behavior and CO2 exchange characteristics in amphistomatous leaves. Plant Physiol 74: 47–51Google Scholar
  63. Neger FW (1912) Spaltöffnungsschluß und künstliche Turgorsteigerung. Ber Duet Bot Ges 30: 179–194Google Scholar
  64. Neger FW (1918) Die Wegsamkeit der Laubblätter für Gase. Flora 111: 152–161Google Scholar
  65. Omasa K (1990) Image instrumentation methods of plant analysis. In: Linskens HF and Jackson JF (eds) Modern Methods of Plant Analysis New Series, Physical Methods in Plant Sciences, Vol 11, pp 203–243. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  66. Omasa K, Hashimoto Y and Aiga I (1981) A quantitative analysis of the relationships between O3 absorption and its acute effects on plant leaves using image instrumentation. Environ Control Biol 19: 85–92Google Scholar
  67. Omasa K, Hashimoto Y and Aiga I (1983) Observation of stomatal movements of intact plants using an image instrumentation system with a light microscope. Plant Cell Physiol 24: 281–288Google Scholar
  68. Omasa K, Hashimoto Y, Kramer PJ, Strain BR, Aiga I and Kondo J (1985) Direct observation of reversible and irreversible stomatal responses of attached sunflower leaves to SO2. Plant Physiol 79: 153–158Google Scholar
  69. Omasa K, Shimazaki K-I., Aiga I, Larcher W and Onoe M (1987) Image analysis of chlorophyll fluorescence transient for diagnosing the photosynthetic system of attached leaves. Plant Physiol 84: 748–752Google Scholar
  70. Ortiz-Lopez A, Nie GY, Ort DR and Baker NR (1990) The involvement of the photoinhibition of Photosystem II and impaired membrane energization in the reduced quantum yield of carbon assimilation in chilled maize. Planta 181: 78–84Google Scholar
  71. Osmond CB (1971) Metabolite transport in C4 photosynthesis. Aust J Biol Sci 24: 159–163Google Scholar
  72. Parkhurst DF (1977) A three-dimensional model for CO2 uptake by continuously distributed mesophyll in leaves. J Theor Biol 67: 471–488Google Scholar
  73. Parkhurst DF (1986) Internal leaf structure: A three dimensional perspective. In: Givnish TJ (ed) On the Economy of Plant Form and Function, pp 215–249. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  74. Parkhurst DF and Mott KA (1990) Intercellular diffusion limits to CO2 uptake in leaves. Studies in air and helox. Plant Physiol 94: 1024–1032Google Scholar
  75. Parkhurst DF, Wong S-C, Farquhar GD and Cowan IR (1988) Gradients of intercellular CO2 levels across the leaf mesophyll. Plant Physiol 86: 1032–1037Google Scholar
  76. Patzke J (1990) Die Heterogenität der Stomaweiten und ihr Einfluss auf die Verteilung des Kohlendioxids und der Photosyntheseaktivität im Blatt: Gaswechselmessungen, Rasterelektronenmikroskopie und Chlorophyll-fluoreszenz-Bildanalyse. Dissertation, Göttingen, Georg-August-UniversitätGoogle Scholar
  77. Raschke K (1982) Involvement of abscisic acid in the regulation of gas exchange: Evidence and inconsistency. In: Wareing PF (ed) Plant Growth Substances 1982, pp 581–590. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  78. Raschke K (1989) How abscisic acid causes depression of the photosynthetic capacity of leaves. In: Pharis RP and Rood S (eds) Plant Growth Substances 1988, pp 383–390. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  79. Raschke K and Hedrich R (1985) Simultaneous and independent effects of abscisic acid on stomata and the photosynthetic apparatus in whole leaves. Planta 163: 105–118Google Scholar
  80. Raschke K, Patzke J, Daley PF and Berry JA (1990) Spatial and temporal heterogeneities of photosynthesis detected through analysis of chlorophyll-fluorescence images of leaves. In: Baltscheffsky M (ed) Current Research in Photosynthesis, Vol IV, pp 573–578. Kluwer Academi Publishers, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  81. Robinson SP, Grant WJR and Loveys BR (1988) Stomatal limitation of photosynthesis in abscisic acid-treated and water-stressed leaves measured at elevated CO2. Aust J Plant Physiol 15: 495–503Google Scholar
  82. Sachs J (1862) Über den Einfluss des Lichtes auf die Bildung des Amylums in den Chlorophyllkörnern. Bot Z 20: 365–373Google Scholar
  83. Sampson J (1961) A method of replicating dry or moist surface for examination by light microscope. Nature 191: 932–933Google Scholar
  84. Scheuermann R, Biehler K, Stuhlfauth T and Fock HP (1991) Simultaneous gas exchange and fluorescence measurements indicate differences in the response of sunflower, bean and maize to water stress. Photosynth Res 27: 189–197Google Scholar
  85. Schreiber U, Schliwa U and Bilger W (1986) Continuous recording of photochemical and non-photochemical chlorophyll fluorescence quenching with a new type of modulation fluorometer. Photosynth Res 10: 51–62Google Scholar
  86. Sharkey TD and Raschke K (1980) Effects of phaseic acid and dihydrophaseic acid on stomata and the photosynthetic apparatus. Plant Physiol 65: 292–297Google Scholar
  87. Sharkey TD and Seemann JR (1989) Mild water stress effects on carbon-reducing cycle intermediates, ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase activity, and spatial homogeneity of photosynthesis in intact leaves. Plant Physiol 89: 1060–1065Google Scholar
  88. Sharkey TD, Imai K, Farquhar GD and Cowan IR (1982) A direct confirmation of the standard method of estimating intercellular partial pressure of CO2. Plant Physiol 69: 657–659Google Scholar
  89. Sharkey TD, Loreto F and Vassey TL (1990) Effects of stress on photosynthesis. In: Baltscheffsky M (ed) Current Research in Photosynthesis, Vol IV, pp 549–559. Kluwer Academic Publishers, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  90. Sinnott EW (1960) Plant Morphogenesis. McGraw Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  91. Smith S, Weyers JDB and Berry WG (1989) Variation in stomatal characteristics over the lower surface of Commelina communis leaves. Plant Cell Environ 12: 653–659Google Scholar
  92. Spence RD (1987) the problem of variability in stomatal responses, particularly aperture variance, to environmental and experimental conditions. New Phytol 107: 303–315Google Scholar
  93. Stuhlfauth T, Scheuermann R and Fock HP (1990) Light energy dissipation under water stress conditions. Contribution of reassimilation and evidence for additional processes. Plant Physiol 92: 1053–1061Google Scholar
  94. Stuhlfauth T, Sültemeyer DF, Weinz S and Fock HP (1988) Fluorescence quenching and gas exchange in a water stressed C3 plant, Digitalis lanata. Plant Physiol 86: 246–250Google Scholar
  95. Terashima I, Wong S-C, Osmond CB, and Farquhar GD (1988) Characterisation of non-uniform photosynthesis induced by abscisic acid in leaves having different mesophyll anatomies. Plant Cell Physiol 29: 385–394Google Scholar
  96. VanGardingen PR, Jeffree CE and Grace J (1989) Variation in stomatal aperture in leaves of Avena fatua L. observed by low-temperature scanning electron microscopy. Plant Cell Environ 12: 887–898Google Scholar
  97. Vassey TL and Sharkey TD (1989) Mild water stress of Phaseolus vulgaris plants leads to reduced starch synthesis and extractable sucrose phosphate synthase activity. Plant Physiol 89: 1066–1070Google Scholar
  98. Vassey TL, Quick WP, Sharkey TD and Stitt M (1991) Water stress, carbon dioxide, and light effects on sucrose phosphate synthase activity in Phaseolus vulgaris. Physiol Plant 81: 37–41Google Scholar
  99. Weyers JDB and Johansen LG (1985) Accurate estimation of stomatal aperture from silicone rubber impressions. New Physiol 101: 109–115Google Scholar
  100. Wise RR, Frederick JR, Alm DM, Kramer DM, Hesketh JD, Crofts AR and Ort DR (1990) Investigation of the limitations to photosynthesis induced by water deficit in field-grown sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Plant Cell Environ 13: 923–931Google Scholar
  101. Wise RR, Ortiz-Lopez A and Ort DR (1992) Spatial distribution of photosynthesis during drought in field-grown and acclimated and non-acclimated growth-chamber-grown cotton. Plant Physiol (in press).Google Scholar
  102. Wise RR, Sparrow DH, Ortiz-Lopez A and Ort DR (1991) Biochemical regulation during the mid-day decline of photosynthesis in field-grown sunflower. Plant Sci 74: 45–52Google Scholar
  103. Wylie RB (1943) The role of the epidermis in foliar organization and its relations to the minor venation. Amer J Bot 30: 272–280Google Scholar
  104. Wylie RB (1952) The bundle sheath extension in leaves of dicotyledons. Amer J Bot 39: 645–651Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ichiro Terashima
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Botany, Faculty of ScienceUniversity of TokyoTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations