Skip to main content
Log in

Ecological aspects of transgenic sugar beet: transfer and expression of herbicide resistance in hybrids with wild beets

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

An increasing number of genetically engineered cultivars of several crops is being experimentally released into the environment. In future, crops with new transgenic traits will probably play an important role in agricultural practice. The long-term effect of transgenes on community ecology will depend on the distribution and establishment of transgenic plants in the wild, on the sexual transfer of their new genes to the environment and on the potential ecological impact of the transgenic trait. The starting point was the use of transgenic sugar beet lines, Beta vulgaris subspec. vulgaris var. altissima DÖLL (Helm 1957), with transgenes coding for rhizomania and herbicide (BASTA®) resistance. The first two questions to answer were: Can the transgenes be transferred via pollen to wild beets, Beta vulgaris subspec. maritima (L.) ARCANG. or cultivated relatives such as red beet or spinach beet and are they expressed in the hybrids? Can transgenes be monitored in young Beta vulgaris-hybrids? The experimental transfer of transgenes was conducted in 1993 at a field location in northern Germany. The beets were hand-pollinated with transgenic pollen. In a non destructive biotest, the hybrid seedlings were tested for herbicide resistance. Transgenic plants showed no noxious phenotypic effects whereas control plants developed leaf necroses. All herbicide resistant hybrids within the biotest were assumed to be transgenic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barocka, K. H. 1985. Zucker- und Futterrüben in: Lehrbuch der Pflanzenzüchtung landwirtschaftlicher Kulturformen. Bd. 2, Spezieller Teil, Paul Parey Verlag, Berlin-Hamburg. 245–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartsch, D., Haag, C., Morak, C., Pohl, M., Witte, B. 1994. Autecological studies of the competitiveness of transgenic sugar beets. Verhandlungen der Gesellschaft für Ökologie. Ban 23: 435–444

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, E., Ludwig, G., Auerswald, ED., Reiss, B., Schaller, H. 1982. Nucleotide sequence and exact localization of the neomycin phosphotransferase gene from transposon TN5. Gene 19: 327–336

    Google Scholar 

  • Boudry, P., Mörchen, M., Saumitou-Laprade, P., Vernet, P. H. and Van Dijk, H. 1993. The origin and evolution of weed beets: consequences for the breeding and release of herbicide-resistant transgenic sugar beets. Theor Appl Genet 87: 471–478

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, A. and Weir, J. 1981. The evolution of weed beet in sugar beet crops. Kulturpflanze 29: 301–310

    Google Scholar 

  • Helm, J. 1957. Versuch einer morphologisch-systematischen Gliederung der Art Beta vulgaris L. Züchter 27: 203–223

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornsey, K. G. and Arnold, M. H. 1979. The origin of weed beet. Ann Appl Biol 92: 279–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knapp, E. 1958. Beta-Rüben, Handbuch der Pflanzenzüchtung. Bd Züchtung der Knollen- und Wurzelfruchtarten. Kappert, H. and Rudorf, W. (eds.). Parey Verlag, Berlin Hamburg. 196–283

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, C., Di Maio, J., Carswell, G. K. and Shillito, R. D. 1993. Selection of transformed protoplast-derived zea mays colonies with phosphinothricin and a novel assay using the pH indicator chlorophenol red. Planta 190: 454–458

    Google Scholar 

  • Lexander, K. 1980. Present knowledge on sugar beet bolting mechanisms. Proc. Int. Inst. Sugar Beet Research 43rd Winter Congress Brussels. 245–258

  • Longden, P. C. 1989. Effects of increasing weed-beet density on sugar-beet yield and quality. Ann Appl Biol 114: 527–532

    Google Scholar 

  • Meulewaeter, F., Soetaert, P., van Emmelo, J. 1989. Structural analysis of the coat protein gene in different BNYVV isolates. Medelingen Faculteit Landbouwwetenschap Rijksuniversiteit Gent 54/2: 465–468

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadeghian, S. Y. and Johansson, E. 1993. Genetic study of bolting and stem length in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) using an factorial cross design. Euphytica 65: 177–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Santoni, S. and Berville, A. 1991. Characterization of the nuclear ribosomal DNA-units and phylogeny of Beta L. wild forms and cultivated beets. Theor Appl Genet 83: 533–542

    Google Scholar 

  • Santoni, S. and Berville, A. 1992. Evidence for gene exchange between sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) and wild beets: consequences for transgenic sugar beets. Plant Molecular Biology 20: 578–580

    Google Scholar 

  • Smit, A. L. 1982. Influence of the temperature and day length on bolting in sugar beet, Proceedings of the International Institute for Sugar beet Research 45th Winter Congress Brussels. 25–36

  • Thompson, CJ., Mova, NR., Tizard, R., Crameri, R., Davies, JE, Lauwereys, R., Botterman, J. 1987. Characterization of the herbicide-resistance gene bar from Streptomyces hygroscopicus. EMBO Journal 6(9): 2519–2523

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bartsch, D., Pohl-Orf, M. Ecological aspects of transgenic sugar beet: transfer and expression of herbicide resistance in hybrids with wild beets. Euphytica 91, 55–58 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00035276

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00035276

Key words

Navigation