Skip to main content
Log in

Some guidelines for a consistent use of the Weibull statistics with ceramic fibres

  • Published:
International Journal of Fracture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Statistical strength analysis of advanced fibres is often performed using the Weibull distribution. This statistical approach is firstly made to give a fine but concise summary of the numerous experimental data with two or three significant parameters only and to allow easy discussion of the physical mechanisms, e.g. of the influence of annealing treatments on mechanical properties. Secondly it is a way for deducing properties of a material within a structure or in another testing geometry (other gauge lengths for instance).

Too great an error in the statistical determination of ‘physical’ parameters does not permit achieving any of these purposes. Therefore, some thoughts on the precision of the usual method of statistical determination of the Weibull parameters, as well as a ‘new’ method which is more confident, are proposed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. El. M. Asloun, J.B. Donnet, G. Guilpain, M. Nardin and J. Schultz, Journal of Materials Science 24 (1989) 3504–3510.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J.J. Masson, K. Schulte, F. Girot and Y. Le Petitcorps, in Proceedings of E-MRS 1990 Spring Meeting, Symp. B. Strasbourg, May 29–June 1, in Materials Science and Engineering A.

  3. Y. Kasai and M. Saito, Fibers Science and Technology 12 (1979) 21–29.

    Google Scholar 

  4. K.K. Phani, Composites Science and Technology 30 (1987) 59–71.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fu He and R.E. Wang, in Proceedings of International Symposium on Composite Materials Structures, Technonic: Lancaster (1986) 75–79.

  6. J.W. Hitchen and D.C. Phillips, Fibers Science and Technology 12 (1979) 217–233.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Y. Le Petitcorps, Ph. D., University of Bordeaux I, France, Dec. 1985.

  8. H. Goda and H. Fukunaga, Journal of Materials Science 21 (1986) 4475–4480.

    Google Scholar 

  9. S.H. Own, R.v. Subramanian and S.C. Saunders, Journal of Materials Science 21 (1986) 3912–3920.

    Google Scholar 

  10. S.D. Durham, J.D. Lynch and W.J. Padgett, Journal of Composite Materials 22 (1988) 1131–1140.

    Google Scholar 

  11. H.D. Wagner, Journal of Polymers Science 29 (1) (1989) 115–149.

    Google Scholar 

  12. H.D. Wagner, Hybrid Effects in the fatigue behaviour of hybrid composites, Department of Materials Research, Weizman Institute of Science, PCL-88-01, February 88.

  13. E. Bourgain and J.J. Masson, Composite Science and Technology 43 (1992) 221–228.

    Google Scholar 

  14. K. Trustman and A. de S. Jayatilaka, Journal of Materials Science 14 (1979) 1080–1084.

    Google Scholar 

  15. B. Bergman, Journal of Materials Science Letters 3 (1984) 689–692.

    Google Scholar 

  16. A. Khalili, Statistik und Festigkeit. DKG-Seminar, 22–23. Febr. 1989, Stuttgart.

  17. D.R. Thomas, L.J. Bain and C.E. Antle, Technonetics 11, No. 3 (1969) 445–460.

    Google Scholar 

  18. K.J. Chen and R.J. Diefendorf, in Proceedings of the IV International Conference on Composite Materials, Tokyo (1982) 97–105.

  19. S.L. Phoenix and R.G. Sexmith, Journal of Composite Materials 6 (1972) 322–337.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Masson, J.J., Bourgain, E. Some guidelines for a consistent use of the Weibull statistics with ceramic fibres. Int J Fract 55, 303–319 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00035188

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00035188

Keywords

Navigation