Skip to main content
Log in

Use of the GUS gene as a selectable marker for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Rubus

  • Article
  • Published:
Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A transformation system was established for red raspberry, blackberry and blackberry x raspberry hybrids, utilizing the binary vector system of Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Leaf discs or internodal stem segments were inoculated with Agrobacterium strain LBA4404 containing the binary vectors PBI121.X, which has the β-glucuronidase (GUS) marker gene, or Bin 19, which has the neomycin phosphotransferase II (NPT II) gene. Regenerants were produced on media containing MS salts, 20 gl-1 sucrose, 7 gl-1 agar, 100 mgl-1 inositol, 0.5 mgl-1 nicotinic acid, 0.5 mgl-1 pyridoxine-HCl, 0.1 mgl-1 thiamine, and either 0.1 mgl-1 IBA and 2 mgl-1 BAP for leaf discs, or 0.2 mgl-1 BAP and 0.2 mgl-1 2,4-D for stem segments. Kanamycin sulphate, which was used as a selective agent for the NPT II gene, inhibited organogenesis at 50 mgl-1 and was therefore unsuitable for use as a selectable marker gene in Rubus. All regenerants were assayed utilizing the fluorogenic assay procedure to determine if the GUS gene had been transferred into the material and could therefore cleave the substrate 4-methyl-umbelliferyl-β-D-glucuronide. Seven GUS-positive plantlets were obtained which confirmed that this marker gene had been transferred into Rubus. A ‘dot blot’ assay was carried out on GUS-positive plant material to establish if the NPT II gene had also been transferred to the plant material.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bevan M (1984) Binary Agrobacterium vectors for plant transformation. Nucleic Acids Res 12: 8711–8721

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fraley RT, Rogers SG, Horsch RB, Sanders PR, Flick JS, Adams SP, Bittner ML, Brand LA, Fink CL, Fry JS, Galluppi GR, Goldberg SB, Hoffmann NL, Woo SC (1983) Expression of bacterial genes in plant cells. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 80: 4803–4807

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fillatti JAJ, Sellmer J, McCown B, Haissig B, Comai L (1987) Agrobacterium mediated transformation and regeneration of Populus. Mol Gen Genet 206: 192–199

    Google Scholar 

  4. Guerche P, Jouanin L, Tepfer D, Pelletier G (1987) Genetic transformation of oilseed rape (Brassica napus) by the Ri T-DNA of Agrobacterium rhizogenes and analysis of inheritance of the transformed phenotype. Mol Gen Genet 206: 382–386

    Google Scholar 

  5. Herrera-Estrella L, De Block M, Messens E, Hernalsteens J-P, Van Montagu M, Schell J (1983) Chimeric genes as dominant selectable markers in plant cells. EMBO J 2 987–995

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hille J, Klasen I, Schilperoort R (1982) Construction and application of R prime plasmids, carrying different segments of an octopine Ti plasmid from A. tumefaciens, for complementation of vir genes. Plasmid 7: 107–118

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hoekema A, Hirsch PR, Hooykaas PJJ, Schilperoort RA (1983) A binary plant vector strategy based on separation of vir and T-region of the A. tumefaciens Ti plasmid. Nature 303: 179–180

    Google Scholar 

  8. Horsch RB, Klee HJ (1986) Rapid assay of foreign gene expression in leaf discs transformed by A. tumefaciens: role of T-DNA borders in transfer process. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 83: 4428–4432

    Google Scholar 

  9. James DJ (1987) In: Russel GE (Ed) Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering Reviews. Vol 5 (pp 33–79)Intercept, Newcastle-upon-Tyne

  10. James DJ, Passey AJ (1989) Genetic transformation of apple (Malus pumila Mill.) using a disarmed Ti binary vector. Plant Cell Rep (in press)

  11. Jefferson RA (1987) Assaying chimeric genes in plants: The GUS gene fusion system. Plant Mol Biol Reporter 8: 387–405

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jefferson RA (1987) GUS Gene Fusion System Users Manual. Version 1.21. Department of Molecular Genetics, Plant Breeding Institute, Cambridge, England

    Google Scholar 

  13. Joos H, Inze D (1983) Genetic analysis of T-DNA transcripts in nopaline crown galls. Cell 32: 1057–1067

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lemmers M, De Beuckeleer M, Holsters M, Zambryski P, Depicker A, Hernalsteens JP, Van Montagu M, Schell J (1980) Internal organisation boundaries and integration of Ti-plasmid DNA in nopaline crown gall tumours. J Mol Biol 144: 353–376

    Google Scholar 

  15. Maniatis T, Fritsch EF, Sambrook J (1982) Molecular Cloning. A Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbour Laboratory

  16. Muller AJ, Mendel RR, Schiemann J, Simoens C, Inze D (1987) High meiotic stability of a foreign gene introduced into tobacco by Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. Mol Gen Genet 207: 171–175

    Google Scholar 

  17. McDonnell RE, Clark RD, Smith WA, Hinchee MA (1987) A simplified method for the detection of neomycin phosphotransferase II activity in transformed plant tissue. Plant Mol Biol Reporter 5: 380–386

    Google Scholar 

  18. McNicol RJ, Graham J (1988) Agrobacterium spp. as vectors of DNA. Annual Report of Scottish Crop Research Institute for 1987 (pp89–90)

  19. McNicol RJ, Graham J (1989) In vitro regeneration of Rubus from leaf and stem segments. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Culture (in press)

  20. Paszkawski J, Shillito RD, Saul M, Mandak V, Hohn T, Hohn B, Potrykus I (1984) Direct gene transfer to plants. EMBO J 3: 2717–2722

    Google Scholar 

  21. Radke SE, Andrews BM, Moloney MM, Crouch ML, Kridl JC, Knauf VC (1988) Transformation of Brassica napus L. using Agrobacterium tumefaciens: developmentally regulated expression of a reintroduced napin gene. Theor Appl Genet 75: 685–694

    Google Scholar 

  22. Reiss B, Sprengel R, Will H, Schaller H (1984) A new sensitive method for qualitative and quantitative assay of neomycin phosphotransferase in crude cell extracts. Gene 30: 211–218

    Google Scholar 

  23. Simpson RB, Spielmann A, Margossian L, McKnight TD (1986) A disarmed binary vector for Agrobacterium tumefaciens functions in A. rhizogenes. Plant Mol Biol 6: 403–415

    Google Scholar 

  24. Zambryski P, Depicker A, Kruger D, Goodman HM (1982) Tumour induction by Agrobacterium tumefaciens: analysis of the boundaries of T-DNA. J Mol Appl Genet 1: 361–370

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Graham, J., McNicol, R.J. & Kumar, A. Use of the GUS gene as a selectable marker for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Rubus . Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 20, 35–39 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00034754

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00034754

Key words

Navigation