Skip to main content
Log in

Variation in structure and plant regeneration of Agrobacterium rhizogenes transformed and control roots of the potato cv. Bintje

  • Article
  • Published:
Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Agrobacterium rhizogenes transformed and control roots of the tetraploid potato cv. Bintje were compared. Transformed roots were obtained after infection by A. rhizogenes 15834 or 1855. Both in leaf and stem segments, more roots were formed at the basal side of the segments, indicative for a polarity in root formation. As compared to control roots the transformed roots are characterized by smaller and more densely stained cells, a zone of cell division, and smaller statoliths. These characteristics are correlated with vigorous growth, high branching incidence and diminished geotropism. The plant regeneration procedure according to Ooms et al. [1] was modified. The transformed roots required less 2,4-D than control roots for the induction of shoot-competent calli. The callus and shoot induction phases were reduced from 8 and 6 weeks to 3 and 3 weeks, respectively. Upon induction, 25%, 58% and 61% of the root clones originating from tuber, stem and leaf, respectively, produced shoots, whereas all of the control roots produced shoots. Shoot outgrowth occurred on liquid MS medium in the absence of hormones.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

Ri-root:

Agrobacterium rhizogenes transformed root

BAP:

benzylaminopurine

IAA:

indoleacetic acid

GA3 :

gibberellic acid

NAA:

naphthaleneacetic acid

2,4-D:

2,4 dichlorophenoxyacetic acid

References

  1. Ooms G, Karp A, Burrell MM, Twell D, Roberts J (1985) Genetic modification of potato development using Ri T-DNA. Theor Appl Genet 70: 440–446

    Google Scholar 

  2. Petit A, David C, Ellis GA, Guyon JG, Casse-Delbart F, Tempé J (1983) Further extension of the opine concept: plasmids in Agrobacterium rhizogenes cooperate for opine degradation. Mol Gen Genet 190: 204–214

    Google Scholar 

  3. Huffman GA, White FF, Gordon MP, Nester EW (1984) Hairy root inducing plasmid: physical map and homology to tumor-inducing plasmids. J Bacteriol 157: 269–276

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jouanin L (1984) Restriction map of an agropine-type Ri-plasmid and its homologies with Ti plasmids. Plasmid 12: 91–102

    Google Scholar 

  5. White FF, Taylor BH, Huffman GA, Gordon MP, Nester EW (1985) Molecular and genetic analysis of the transferred DNA regions of the root-inducing plasmid of Agrobacterium rhizogenes. J Bacteriol 164: 33–44

    Google Scholar 

  6. Offringa IA, Melchers LS, Regensburg-Tuinck AJG, Costantino P, Schilperoort RA, Hooykaas PJJ (1986) Complementation of Agrobacterium tumefaciens tumor-inducing aux mutants by genes from the TR-region of the Ri plasmid of Agrobacterium rhizogenes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 83: 6935–6939

    Google Scholar 

  7. Vilaine F, Charbonnier C, Casse-Delbart F (1987) Further insight concerning the TL region of the Ri plasmid of Agrobacterium rhizogenes strain A4: transfer of a 1.9 kb fragment is sufficient to induce transformed roots on tobacco leaf fragments. Mol Gen Genet 210: 111–115

    Google Scholar 

  8. Spena A, Schmülling T, Koncz C, Schell JS (1987) Independent and synergistic activity of rol A,B and C loci in stimulating abnormal growth in plants. EMBO J 6: 3891–3899

    Google Scholar 

  9. Tepfer D (1984) Transformation of several species of higher plants by Agrobacterium rhizogenes: sexual transmission of the transformed genotype and phenotype. Cell 37: 959–967

    Google Scholar 

  10. David C, Tempé J (1988) Genetic transformation of cauliflower (Brassica oleracea L. var. Botrytis) by Agrobacterium rhizogenes. Plant Cell Rep 7: 88–91

    Google Scholar 

  11. Peterson RL (1975) The initiation and development of root buds. In: Torrey JG, Clarkson DT (Eds) The Development and Function of Roots (pp 125–161) Academic Press, London/New York/San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hoekema A, Hooykaas PJ, Schilperoort RA (1984) Transfer of the octopine T-DNA segment to plant cells mediated by different types of Agrobacterium tumor or root-inducing plasmids: generalities of virulence systems. J Bacteriol 158: 383–385

    Google Scholar 

  13. Simpson RB, Spielmann A, Margossian L, McKnigt TD (1986) A disarmed binary vector from Agrobacterium tumefaciencs functions in Agrobacterium rhizogenes. Plant Mol Biol 6: 403–415

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sree Ramulu K (1986) Case histories of genetic variability in vitro: potato. In Vasil IK (Ed) Cell Culture and Somatic Cell Genetics, Vol 3 (pp 449–473) Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hänisch ten Cate ChH, Ennik E, Roest S, Sree Ramulu K, Dijkhuis P, de Groot B (1988) Regeneration and characterisation of plants from potato root lines transformed by Agrobacterium rhizogenes. Theor Appl Genet 75: 452–459

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ottaviani MP, Hänisch ten Cate ChH (1987) Plant regeneration from normal and Agrobacterium rhizogenes-transformed roots in the tetraploid potato cultivar Bintje. Acta Bot Neerl 36 (Suppl 1): 45

    Google Scholar 

  17. Anand VK, Haberlein GT (1977) Crown gall tumorigenesis ii potato tuber tissue. Am J Bot 64: 153–158

    Google Scholar 

  18. Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissues cultures. Physiol Plant 15: 473–497

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hänisch ten Cate ChH, Sree Ramulu K, Dijkhuis P, de Groot B (1987) Genetic stability of cultured hairy roots induced by Agrobacterium rhizogenes on tuber discs of potato cv. Bintje. Plant Sci 49: 217–222

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gerrits PO, Smid L (1983) A new, less toxic polymerization system for the embedding of soft tissues in glycol methylacrylate and subsequent preparing of serial sections. J Microsc 132: 81–85

    Google Scholar 

  21. Jensen W (1962) Botanical Histochemistry: Principles and Practice. WH Freeman, San Fransisco/London

    Google Scholar 

  22. Chriqui D, David C, Adam S (1988) Effect of differentiated or dedifferentiated state of tobacco pith tissue on its behaviour after inoculation with Agrobacterium rhizogenes. Plant Cell Rep 7: 111–114

    Google Scholar 

  23. Cardarelli M, Spano L, De Paolis A, Mauro ML, Vitali G, Costantino P (1985) Identification of the genetic locus responsible for non polar induction by Agrobacterium rhizogenes 1855. Plant Mol Biol 5: 385–391

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ryder MH, Tate ME, Kerr A (1985) Virulence properties of strains of Agrobacterium on the apical and basal surfaces of carrot root discs. Plant Physiol 77: 215–221

    Google Scholar 

  25. Jouanin L, Guerche P, Pamboukdjian N, Tourneur C, Casse-Delbart F, Tourneur J (1987) Structure of T-DNA in plants regenerated from roots transformed by Agrobacterium rhizogenes strain A4. Mol Gen Genet 206: 389–392

    Google Scholar 

  26. Byrne MC, Koplow J, David C, Chilton MD (1983) Structure of T-DNA in roots transformed by Agrobacterium rhizogenes. J Mol Appl Genet 2: 201–209

    Google Scholar 

  27. Schmülling T, Schell J, Spena A (1988) Single genes from Agrobacterium rhizogenes influence plant development. EMBO J 7: 2621–2629

    Google Scholar 

  28. Loomis RS, Torrey JG (1964) Chemical control of vascular cambium initiation in isolated radish roots. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 52: 3–11

    Google Scholar 

  29. Noll F (1892) Ueber Heterogene Induktion. Leipzig

  30. Volkmann D, Sievers (1979) Graviperception in multicellular organs. In: Haupt W, Feinleib M (Eds) Physiology of Movements. Encyclopaedia Plant Physiology, NS 7: 573–600

  31. Van de Geyn SC, Helder J, van Hooren HG, Hänisch ten Cate ChH (1988) Growth, root respiration and phosphorous utilization of normal and Agrobacterium rhizogenes transformed potato plants. Plant Soil 111: 283–288

    Google Scholar 

  32. Ambros PF, Matzke AJM, Matzke MA (1986) Localization of Agrobacterium rhizogenes T-DNA in plant chromosomes by in situ hybridization. EMBO J 5: 2073–2077

    Google Scholar 

  33. Ooms G, Twell D, Bossen ME, Hage JC, Burrell MM (1986) Developmental regulation of Ri TL-DNA gene expression in roots, shoots and tubers of transformed potato (Solanum tuberosum cv. Désirée). Plant Mol Biol 6: 321–330

    Google Scholar 

  34. Trulson AJ, Simpson RB, Shahin AE (1986) Transformation of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) plants with Agrobacterium rhizogenes. Theor Appl Genet 73: 11–15

    Google Scholar 

  35. Shen WH, Petit A, Guern J, Tempé J (1988) Hairy roots are more sensitive to auxin than normal roots. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85: 3417–3421

    Google Scholar 

  36. Canfield ML, Moore LW (1983) Production of ethylene by Daucus carota inoculated with Agrobacterium tumefaciens and Agrobacterium rhizogenes. Z Pflanzenphysiol 112: 471–474

    Google Scholar 

  37. Minota T, Kikuta Y, Okazawa Y (1979) Effect of ethylene on sprout growth and endogenous growth substances of potato plants. J Fac Agric Hokkaido Univ 59: 239–248

    Google Scholar 

  38. Maan AC, van der Linde PCG, Harkes PAA, Libbenga KR (1985) Correlation between the presence of membrane-bound auxin binding and root regeneration in cultured tobacco-cells. Planta 164: 376–378

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ottaviani, M.P., Schel, J.H.N. & Hänisch ten Cate, C.H. Variation in structure and plant regeneration of Agrobacterium rhizogenes transformed and control roots of the potato cv. Bintje. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 20, 25–34 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00034753

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00034753

Key words

Navigation