Skip to main content
Log in

Use of PCR-based methodologies for the determination of DNA diversity between Saccharum varieties

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

In this study, two PCR-based methodologies were evaluated for potential use in the determination of DNA diversity between 20 commercial sugarcane hybrids and 6 ‘outgroup’ varieties of S. spontaneum, S. officinarum and hybrids from early in the genealogy. The first method involved PCR amplification of sugarcane DNA in the presence of random, decamer primers (RAPDs), while the second protocol utilized specific microsatellite and telomere sequences as primers. A total of 41 RAPD primers (356 loci) were screened across the varieties of which 15 (160 loci) were used in the calculation of DNA diversity (expressed% similarity). This varied from 61 to 95%, with most of the commercial varieties showing more than 80% similarity in their DNA. The RAPD data indicated that there had been a gradual decline in DNA diversity (84% reduction) from the early inter-specific crosses to the commercial hybrids, probably as a result of backcrossing and in-breeding strategies used in the previous 5 to 6 generations of sugarcane breeding. The microsatellite and telomere data produced a much greater range in DNA similarity values (25–91%), probably due to the fact that these primers detect highly variable regions of the genome. It is suggested that these specific primers would not be suitable for determination of DNA diversity, but could be used more effectively in the development of a methodology for routine, rapid identification of sugarcane varieties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aljanabi, S. M, R.J. Honeycutt, M. McClelland & B.W.S. Sobral, 1993. A genetic linkage map of Saccharum spontaneum (L.) SES 208. Genetics 134(4): 1249–1260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckmann, J.S., & M. Soller, 1983. Restriction fragment length polymorphisms in genetic improvement: methodologies, mapping and cost. Theor. Appl. Genet. 67: 35–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berding, N. & B.T. Roach, 1987. Germplasm maintenance and use. p. 143–210. In: D.J. Heinz (Ed). Developments in Crop Science II. Sugarcane improvement through breeding. (Elsevier).

  • Caetano-Anolles, G., B.J. Bassam & P.M. Gresshoff, 1991a. DNA amplification fingerprinting using very short arbitrary oligonucleotide primers. Biotechnology 9: 553–556.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caetano-Anolles, G., B.J. Bassam & P.M. Gresshoff, 1991b. DNA amplification fingerprinting: a strategy for genome analysis. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 9: 294–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dice, L.R., 1945. Measures of the amount of ecologic association between species. Ecology 26: 297–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gale, M.D., S. Chao & P.J. Sharp, 1990. RFLP mapping in wheat-progress and problems. p. 353–364. In: J.P. Gustafson (Ed). Gene manipulation and plant improvement II. (Plenum Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadrys, H., M. Balick and B. Schierwater, 1992. Amplification of random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPDs) in molecular ecology. Mol. Ecol. 1: 55–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haley, S.D., P.N. Miklas, L. Afanador & J.D. Kelly, 1994. Random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) marker variability between and within pools of common bean. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 119: 122–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinz, D.J., 1987. Sugarcane improvement: current productivity and future opportunities. In: Copersucar International Sugarcane Breeding Workshop Copersucar, Sao Paulo, pp 57–70

  • Honeycutt, H.J., B.W.S. Sobral, P. Kiem & J.E. Irvine, 1992. A rapid DNA extraction method for sugarcane and its relatives. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 10(1): 66–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huff, D.R., R. Peakall & P.E. Smouse, 1993. RAPD variation within and among natural populations of outcrossing buffalograss (Buchloe dactyloides (Nutt.) Engelm.) Theor. Appl. Genet. 86: 927–934.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, P., 1994. Genetic relationships between attributes in sugarcane clones closely related to Saccharum spontaneum. Euphytica 79: 101–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffreys, A.J., V. wilson & S.L. Thein, 1985. Hypervariable ‘minisatellite’ regions in human DNA. Nature 314: 67–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ko, H.L., D.C. Cowan, R.J. Henry, G.C. Graham, A.B. Blakeney & L.G. Lewin, 1994. Random amplified polymorphic DNA analysis of Australian rice (Oryza sativa L.) varieties. Euphytica 80: 179–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolchinsky, A., & P.M. Gresshoff, 1994. Fingerprinting of plant varieties and species with telomeric primers. Plant Genome II Abstracts, pp 43. San Diego, California.

  • Lu, Y.H., A. D'Hont, F. Paulet, L. Grivet, M. Arnaud & J.C. Glaszmann, 1994a. Molecular diversity and genome structure in modern sugarcane varieties. Euphytica 78: 217–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu, Y.H., A. D'Hont, D.I.T. Walker, P.S. Rao, P. Feldmann & J.C. Glaszmann, 1994b. Relationship among ancestral species of sugarcane revealed with RFLP using single copy maize nuclear probes. Euphytica 78: 7–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nei, M. & W.H. Li, 1979. Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 76: 5269–5273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orozco-Castillo, C., K.J. Chalmers, R. Waugh and W. Powell, 1994. Detection of genetic diversity and selective gene introgression in coffee using RAPD markers. Theor. Appl. Genet. 87: 934–940

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, S., 1957. Cytological studies in Saccharum and allied genera. III. Chromosome numbers in interspecific hybrids. Bot. Gaz. 144–159.

  • Price, S., 1965. Interspecific hybridization in sugarcane breeding. Proc. Int. Soc. Sugar Cane Technol. 14: 217–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranjekar, P.K., W. Ramakrishna, K.V. Choudhari, M.D. Lagu & V.S. Gupta, 1994. DNA fingerprinting in rice using simple repetitive DNA sequences and their characterization in rice. Plant Genome II Abstracts, pp 56. San Diego, California.

  • Roach, B.T., 1986. Evaluation and use of sugarcane germplasm. Proceedings of the 19th Congress of the International Society of Sugar Cane Technologists 1: 492–503.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roach, B.T., 1989. Origin and improvement of the genetic base of sugarcane. Proceedings of Australian Society of Sugar Cane Technologists 11: 34–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roach, B.T. & J. Daniels, 1987. A review of the origin and improvement of sugarcane. Copersucar International Sugarcane Breeding workshop 1: 1–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohlf, F.J., 1993. Numerical Taxonomy and Multivariate Analysis System (NTSYS-pc). Exeter Software, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kus-Kortekaas, W., M.J.M. Smulders, P. Arens & B. Vosman, 1994. Direct comparison of genetic variation in tomato detected by a GACA-containing microsatellite probe and by random amplified polymorphic DNA Genome 37: 375–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saiki, R.K., S. Scharf, F. Faloona, K.B. Mullis, G.T. Horn, H.A. Erlich & N. Arnheim, 1985. Enzymic amplification of beta-globin genomic sequences and restriction site analysis for diagnosis of sickle cell anemia. Science 230: 1350–1354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobral, B.W.S., D.P.V. Braga, E.S. LaHood & P. Kiem, 1994. Phylogenetic analysis of chloroplast restriction site mutations in the Saccharinae (Griseb.) subtribe of the Andropogoneae (Dumort.) tribe. Theor. Appl. Genet. (in press).

  • Sreenivasan, T.V., B.S. Ahloowalia & D.J. Heinz, 1987. Cytogenetics. p. 211–253. In: D.J. Heinz (Ed): Developments in Crop Science II. Sugarcane improvement through breeding. (Elsevier).

  • Tautz, D., 1989 Hypervariability of simple sequences as a general source for polymorphic DNA markers. Nuc. Acids Res. 17: 4127–4138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tautz, D., M. Trick & G.A. Dover, 1986. Cryptic simplicity in DNA is a major source of genetic variation. Nature 322: 652–656.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vosman, B., P. Arens, W. Rus-Kortekaas & M.J.M. Smulders, 1992. Identification of highly polymorphic DNA regions in tomato. Theor. Appl. Genet. 85: 239–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weising, K., F. Weigand, A.J. Driesel, G. Kahl, H. Zischler & J.T. Epplen, 1989. Polymorphic simple GATA/GACA repeats in plant genomes. Nuc. Acids Res. 17: 10128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welsh, J. & M. McClelland, 1990. Fingerprinting genomes using PCR with arbitrary primers. Nuc. Acids Res. 18: 7213–7218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, C.E., & D.A. St. Clair, 1993. Phenetic relationships and levles of variability detected by restriction fragment length polymorphisms and random amplified polymorphic DNA analysis of cultivated and wild accessions of Lycopersicon esculentum. Genome 36: 619–629.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J.G.K., A.R. Kubelik, J.K. Livak, J.A. Rafalski & S.V. Tingey, 1990. DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers. Nuc. Acids Res. 18: 6531–6535.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, X., & C. Quiros, 1993. Identification of celery cultivars with RAPD markers. Theor. Appl. Genet. 86: 205–212.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Harvey, M., Botha, F.C. Use of PCR-based methodologies for the determination of DNA diversity between Saccharum varieties. Euphytica 89, 257–265 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00034614

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00034614

Key words

Navigation