Skip to main content
Log in

Selection of endosulfan-tolerant gram cell line

  • General Papers
  • Published:
Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Three alternate exposures of Cicer arietinum (gram) root callus to lethal (1 ppm) endosulfan-containing selective medium (SM) and non-selective medium (NSM) yielded a tolerant cell line (1 ESR). Such an induced resistance was retained during subculture on NSM for 15 generations tested so far. Higher soluble proteins and peroxidase activity were found in 1 ESR compared to mother tissue.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hughes K (1983) Selection for herbicide resistance. In: Sharp WR, Ammirato PV, Yamada Y (eds) Hand Book of plant cell culture. Macmillan, New York pp 442–460

    Google Scholar 

  2. Thomas E, King PJ, Potrykus I (1979) Improvement of crop plants via single cell in vitro An assessment. Z Pflanzenzuchtg 82: 1–30

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chaleff RS (1980) Further characterisation of picloram tolerant mutants of Nicotiana tabaccum. Theor Appl Genetics 58: 91–95

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hughes KW, Negrotto D, Daube ME, Meeusen RL (1984) Free radical stress response in paraquat sensitive & resistant tobacco plant. Env Exp Bot 24: 151–157

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chaleff RS, Ray TB (1984) Herbicides resistant mutants from tobacco cell cultures. Science 223: 1148–1151

    Google Scholar 

  6. Aviv D, Galun E (1977) Isolation of tobacco protoplast in presence of Isopropyl N-phenyl carbamate and their cultures and regulation into plants. Z Pflanzenphysiol 83: 267–273

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chaleff RS, Keil RL (1981) Genetics and physiological variability among cultured cells and regenerated plants of Nicotiana tabaccum. Mole Genet 181: 254–258

    Google Scholar 

  8. Maier-Bode H (1968) Properties, effects, residues and analytics of insecticide endosulfan. Res Rev 22: 1–44

    Google Scholar 

  9. Agarwal S, Beg MU (1982) Effect of endosulfan on the endogenous IAA, cell wall polysaccharides, peroxidase activity and its isoenzymatic pattern in germinating Cicer arietinum seeds. Ind J Exp Biol 20: 319–323

    Google Scholar 

  10. Agarwal S, Beg MU (1982) Biochemical changes in Cicer arietinum seedlings on exposure to endosulfan. Ind J Biochem & Biophys 19: 247–252

    Google Scholar 

  11. Trivedi BS, Beg MU, Gupta RC (1983) Evaluation of endosulfan for its phytotoxic properties. Ind J Bot Soc 62: 393–398

    Google Scholar 

  12. Agarwal S, Beg MU, Krishna Murti CR (1983) Suppression of auxin stimulated growth of barley coleoptile sections by endosulfan. J Biosci 5: 85–86

    Google Scholar 

  13. Farooq M, Beg MU (1985) Effect of endosulfan technical and EC-35 preparation on the permeability of Rhoeo discolor leaf. Pesticides 19 (5): 44–45

    Google Scholar 

  14. Daneil CS, Agarwal S, Agarwal SS (1986) Human red blood cell membrane damage by endosulfan. Toxicol Lett 32: 113–118

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gamborg OL, Miller RA, Ojima K (1968) Nutrient requirement of suspension cultures of soyabean root cells. Exp cell Res 50: 151–158

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lowry OH, Rosebrough NF, Farr AL, Randall RJ (1951) Protein measurement with Folin-phenol reagent. J Biol Chem 193: 265–275

    Google Scholar 

  17. Srivastava AK, Azhar S, Krishna Murti CR (1972) Inhibition of germination of Cicer arietinum. Phytochem II: 3181–3185

    Google Scholar 

  18. Chaleff RS, Parson MF (1978) Direct selection in vitro for herbicide resistant mutants of Nicotiana tabaccum. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 75 (10): 5104–5107

    Google Scholar 

  19. Barg R, Umiel N (1977) Development of tobacco seedlings and callus cultures in presence of amitrol. Z Pflanzenphysiol 83: 437–447

    Google Scholar 

  20. Zenk MJ (1974) In: Kasha KJ (ed) Haploids in higher plants University of Guelph Press Guelph Ontario pp 339–353

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kochba J, Spiegel-Roy P, Saad S (1980) Selection for tolerance to sodium chloride (NaCl) and 2,-dichlorophenoxy acetic acid (2,4-D) in ovular callus lines of Citrus sinensis. In: Sala F, Parisi B, Cella R, Ciferri O (eds) Plant cell cultures: Results and Perspectives. Elseviers North Holland Biomedical Press, Amsterdam pp 187–192

    Google Scholar 

  22. Maliga P, Marton L, Sr Brenovits A (1973) 5-Bromodeoxyuridine resistant cell line from haploid tobacco. Pl Sci Lett 1: 375–383

    Google Scholar 

  23. Cole D (1983) Oxidation of xenobiotics in plants. In: Huston DH, Roberts TR (Eds) Progress in Pesticide Biochemistry and Toxicology Vol 3, John Wiley & Sons pp 199–254

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Saxena, R.P., Beg, M.U. Selection of endosulfan-tolerant gram cell line. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 12, 273–277 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00034368

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00034368

Key words

Navigation