Skip to main content
Log in

Age- and position-of-origin and rootstock effects in Douglas-fir plantlet growth and plagiotropism

  • Published:
Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Plagiotropic angle of seedling-derived Douglas-fir plantlets varied with position of adventitious bud origin on the explanted cotyledon rosette, being least at its center (18°) and greatest (45°) along the basal third of the cotyledon. When the tops of plagiotropic plantlets (55°) were grafted to seedling rootstock, they assumed a near-vertical orientation (10°), with pectinate changed to radial leaf arrangement, within 5 months. Conversely, seedling tops grafted to plagiotropic plantlet rootstock grew plagiotropically (56°). These, and other observations lead to a hypothesis that plagiotropism in cotyledon-derived plantlets results in part from an incomplete vascular connection of the root system to the shoot.

In contrast, the greater plagiotropic angle in plantlets from a 12 year-old tree, decreased by only half (from 72° to 34°) after grafting to seedling rootstock. First-season height increment of these plantlets was only 60 percent of seedling or juvenile plantlet height increment, and was unaffected by rootstock type. The adult-origin plantlets exhibited mature shoot morphology, and unchanged plagiotropism after 2 years growth in large pots. Thus it appears that the culture-induced juvenile appearance and behaviour noted for this material when maintained in vitro, is dependent on the continued presence of the culture conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abo El-Nil MM (1982) Method for asexual reproduction of coniferous trees. Patent No 4,353,184. October 12 US Patent Office

  • Amerson HV, Frampton LJJr, Mott RL & Spaine PC (1988) Tissue culture of conifers using loblolly pine as a model. In: Hanover JW & Keathly DE (Eds) Genetic Manipulation of Woody Plants (pp 117–137). Plenum Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bigot C & Engelmann F (1987) Vegetative propagation in vitro of Cunninghamia lanceolata (Lamb.) Hook. In: Bonga JM & Durzan DJ (Eds) Tissue Culture in Forestry (pp 387–412). Martinus Nijhoff/Dr. W. Junk Publishers, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake TJ, Pharis RP & Reid DM (1980) Ethylene, gibberellins, auxin and the apical control of branch angle in a conifer, Cupressus arizonica. Planta 148: 64–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Bon MC & Monteuuis O (1991) Rejuvenation of a 100-yearold Sequoiadendron giganteum through in vitro meristem culture. II. Biochemical arguments. Physiol. Plant 81: 116–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonga JM (1982) Vegetative propagation in relation to juvenility, maturity, and rejuvenation. In: Bonga JM & Durzan DJ (Eds) Tissue Culture in Forestry (pp 387–412). Martinus Nijhoff/Dr. W. Junk Publishers, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Borchert R (1976) Differences in shoot growth patterns between juvenile and adult trees and their interpretation based on systems analysis of trees. Acta Hort. 56: 123–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmi A & Van Staden J (1983) Role of roots in regulating the growth rate and cytokinin content in leaves. Plant Physiol. 73: 76–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunstan D & Mohammed G (1986) Shoot production and elongation on explants from vegetative buds excised from 17 to 20 year old Pseudotsuga menziesii. New Zealand J. For. Sci. 16(3): 269–282

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood MS (1987) Rejuvenation of forest trees. Plant Growth Regu. 6: 1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta PK & Durzan DJ (1985) Shoot multiplication from mature Douglas-fir and sugar pine. Plant Cell Rep. 4: 177–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Horgan K & Holland L (1990) Micropropagules from mature radiata pine. Abstr. Conifer Biotechnology Working Group, July 1990, Sittingbourne, England

  • Mascarenhas AF, Khuspe SS, Nadgauda RS, Gupta PK & Khan BM (1988) Potential of cell cultures in plantation forestry programs. In: Hanover JW & Keathley DE (Eds) Genetic Manipulation of Woody Plants (pp 391–412). Plenum Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Meins FJr (1983) Heritable variation in plant cell culture. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol, 34: 327–346

    Google Scholar 

  • Misson JP (1988) Multiplication du Thuja plicata par culture in vitro de tissus juveniles et ages. Can. J. For. Res. 18: 473–477

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohammed GH & Vidaver WE (1990) The influence of acclimatization treatment and plantlet morphology on early greenhouse-performance of tissue-cultured Douglas-fir [Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco]. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 21: 111–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Monteuuis O (1986) Microgreffage de points vegetatifs de Sequoiadendron giganteum Buchholz seculaires sur de juenes semis cultives in vitro. C. R. Acad, Sci. 302: 223–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Monteuuis O & Dumas E (1990) Rejuvenation assessment of Pinus pinaster acclimated plantlets from in vitro adventitious budding, axillary budding and micrografting. In: Nijkamp HJJ, Van Der Plas LHW & Van Aartrijk J (Eds) Progress in Plant Cellular and Molecular Biology Proceedings of the VII International Congress on Plant Tissue and Cell Culture, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 24–29 June 1990, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (p. 117)

    Google Scholar 

  • Monteuuis O (1991) Rejuvenation of a 100-year-old Sequoiadendron giganteum through in vitro meristem culture. I. Organogenic and morphological arguments. Physiol. Plant. 81: 116–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadgauda RS, Parasharami VA & Mascarenhas AF (1990) Precocious flowering and seeding behaviour in tissuecultured bamboos. Nature 344: 335–336

    Google Scholar 

  • Nozeran R (1978) Reflexions sur les enchainements de fonctionnement au cours du cycle des vegetaux superieurs. Bull. Soc. Bot. Fr. 125: 263–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Pharis RP & Kuo CG (1977) Physiology of gibberellins in conifers. Can. J. For. Res. 7: 299–325

    Google Scholar 

  • Power AB, Dodd RS & Libby WJ (1986) Cyclophysis and topophysis in coast redwood stecklings. Silv. Genet. 37: 8–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie GA & Long AJ (1986) Field performance of micropropagated Douglas-fir. New Zealand J. For. Sci. 16(3): 343–356

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie GA, Timmis R, Carlson WC & Conrad CE (1988) Epigenetic effects in rejuvenated, microporpagated loblolly pine nursery stock. In: Proceedings, 10th North American Forest Biology Workshop. Vancouver, BC July 20–22, 1988 (p. 158)

  • Sinnott GW (1952) Reaction wood and the regulation of tree form. Amer. J. Bot. 39: 69–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Starbuck CJ & Roberts AN (1983) Compression wood in rooted cuttings of Douglas-fir. Physiol. Plant. 57: 371–374

    Google Scholar 

  • Starbuck CJ, Proebsting WM & Roberts AN (1983) Responses of excised Douglas-fir shoots to disorientation. Hort. Sci. 18: 102–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Timell TE (1986) Compression Wood in Gymnosperms. Vol. 2. Springer-Verlag, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Timmis R (1985) Factors influencing the use of clonal material in commerical forestry. In: Tigerstedt PMA, Puttonen P & Koski V (Eds) Crop Physiology of Forest Trees (pp 259–272) Helsinki University Press

  • Timmis R & Ritchie GA (1984) Progress in Douglas-fir tissue culture. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium of Recent Advances in Forest Biotechnology (pp 37–46). Traverse City, Michigan 10–13 June 1984

  • Wareing PF (1980) Root hormones and shoot growth. In: Little CHA (Ed) Control of Shoot Growth in Trees. Proceedings IUFRO Workshop, July 20–24 (pp 237–256) Frederiction, NB, Canada

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Timmis, R., Ritchie, G.A. & Pullman, G.S. Age- and position-of-origin and rootstock effects in Douglas-fir plantlet growth and plagiotropism. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 29, 179–186 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00034351

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00034351

Key words

Navigation