Skip to main content
Log in

Prescribed burning and hexazinone herbicide as release treatments in a sapling hardwood-loblolly pine stand

  • Published:
New Forests Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To compare release treatments, a randomized complete block study was established in a 7-year-old hardwood-loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) stand in central Louisiana established using chopping and burning. There were 5 blocks of 3 treatments each: (1) check, (2) hexazinone applied once, and (3) prescribed backfiring applied twice. The first burn in December 1985 (7 years after site preparation) had a fire intensity of 90 kJ/s/m. The hexazinone herbicide was applied in April 1986 (the 8th year after site preparation) with a metered spotgun applicator at a rate of 3.0 kg active ingredient/ha. The second burn in March 1989 (the 11th year after site preparation) had a fire intensity of 106 kJ/s/m.

The two prescribed burns increased the number of stems less than 1.5 m tall from 1,380 to 2,960/ha red maple (Acer rubrum L.), blackgum (Nyssa sylvatica var. bifora), and sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua L.). Burning reduced the number of loblolly pines less than 2.0 m tall, which resulted in a significant increase in average loblolly pine height and diameter. Loblolly pine comprised 62 and 59% of the basal area on the check and burn treatments, respectively, 11 years after site preparation. Hexazinone reduced the number of blackgum, sweetgum, and oak (Quercus spp.) from 6,100 to 4,560 stems/ha and resulted in significantly less hardwood tree basal area than found on the check or burn treatments. Therefore, the herbicide treatment resulted in principally a loblolly pine stand (over 80% of the total tree basal area was pine) four years after hexazinone application.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander, M. E. 1982. Calculating and interpreting forest fire intensities. Can. J. Bot. 60: 349–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, F. S. 1929. Effect of excessively high temperature on coniferous reproduction. J. For. 27: 949–975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bragg, T. B. and Hulbert, L. C. 1976. Woody plant invasion of unburned Kansas bluestem prairie. J. Range Manage. 29: 19–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. A. and Davis, K. P. 1973. Forest Fire: Control and Use. Second edition. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, 686 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, S. A. and McDonald, L. L. 1983. Unbiased systematic sampling plans for the line intercept method. J. Range Manage. 36: 463–468.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byram, G. M. 1959. Combustion of forest fuels, pp. 61–89. In: Davis, K. P. (Ed) Forest Fire: Control and Use. McGraw-Hill Book. Co., Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cain, M. D. 1988. A low cost technique for increasing pine volume production in mixed pine-hardwood stands. USDA Forest Serv., South. Forest Exp. Sta., New Orleans, Louisiana. Res. Paper SO-246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, M. Y., Hodgkins, E. J. and Watson, W. J. 1975. Prescribed burning for improving pine production and wildlife habitat in the hilly Coastal Plain of Alabama. Alabama Agric. Exp. Sta. Bull.: 473.

  • Deeming, J. E., Lancaster, J. W., Fosberg, M. A., Furman, R. W. and Schroeder, M. J. 1972. The national fire-danger rating system. USDA Forest Serv., Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Exp. Sta., Fort Collins, Colorado. Res. Paper RM-84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deeming, J. E., Burgan, R. E. and Cohen, J. D. 1978. The national fire-danger rating system — 1978. USDA Forest Serv., Intermountain Forest and Range Exp. Sta., Ogden, Utah. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, E. R. 1957. Stem-kill and sprouting following prescribed fires in a pine-hardwood stand in Texas. J. For. 55: 426–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, E. R. 1961. Effects of prescribed fires on understory stems in pine-hardwood stands in Texas. J. For. 59: 365–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghassemi, M., Quinlivan, S. and Dellarco, M. 1982. Environmental effects of new herbicides for vegetation control in forestry. Environ. Int. 7: 389–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glover, G. R. and Dickens, D. R. 1985. Impact of competing vegetation on yield of the southern pines. Georgia Forestry Comm., Research Division, Atlanta, Georgia. Georgia Forest Res. Paper 59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glover, G. R., Zutter, B. R., Minogue, P. J. and Gjerstad, D. H. 1991. Effect of hexazinone rate and formulation on loblolly pine in broadcast release applications. South. J. Appl. For. 15: 54–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, R. W., Sciferes, C. J. and Mutz, J. L. 1982. Integration of burning and picloram pellets for Macartney rose control. J. Range Manage. 35: 427–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, T. A. and Shilling, C. L. 1987. Predicting girdling probability for pine and hardwood saplings in low-intensity backfires. For. Sci. 33: 1010–1021.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grelen, H. E. 1976. Response of herbage, pines, and hardwoods to early and delayed burning in a young slash pine plantation. J. Range Manage. 29: 301–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haywood, J. D. 1986. Response of planted Pinus taeda L. to brush control in northern Louisiana. For. Eco. Manage. 15: 129–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haywood, J. D. 1993. Preparing planting sites for loblolly pine with hexazinone, picloram, or by chopping and burning. USDA Forest Serv., South. Forest Exp. Sta., New Orleans, Louisiana. Res. Paper SO-272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haywood, J. D. and Tiarks, A. E. 1990. Eleventh-year results of fertilization, herbaceous, and woody plant control in a loblolly pine plantation. South. J. Appl. For. 14: 173–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgkins, E. J. 1958. Effects of fire on undergrowth vegetation in an upland southern pine forest. Ecology 39: 36–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hough, W. A. 1969. Caloric value of some forest fuels of the southern United States. USDA Forest Serv., Southeast. Forest Exp. Sta., Asheville, North Carolina. Res. Note SE-120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansen, R. W., McNab, W. H., Hough, W. A. and Edwards, M. B.Jr. 1976. Fuels, fire behavior, and emissions, pp. 29–44. In: Southern Forestry Smoke Management Guidebook. USDA Forest Serv., Southeast. Forest Exp. Sta., Asheville, North Carolina. Gen. Tech. Rep. SE-10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansen, R. W. and Wade, D. D. 1987. Effects of crown scorch on survival and diameter growth of slash pine. South. J. Appl. For. 11: 180–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, A., Jr., Griffis, B. J., Powell, J. W., Edwards, J. P., Venson, R. L., Long, J. K. and Kilpatrick, W. W. 1980. Soil Survey of Rapides Parish, Louisiana. USDA Soil Conservation Serv. and Forest Serv. in cooperation with Louisiana Agric. Exp. Sta., 86 p.

  • Lay, D. W. 1956. Effects of prescribed burning on forage and mast production in the southern forest. J. For. 54: 582–584.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, A. J. and Flinchum, D. M. 1992. Slash pine response to spot applications of hexazinone pellets for release from oak competition. South. J. Appl. For. 16: 133–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lotti, T. 1956. Eliminating understory hardwoods with summer prescribed fires in Coastal Plain loblolly pine stands. J. For. 54: 191–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayack, D. T., Bush, P. B., Neary, D. B. and Douglass, J. E. 1982. Impact of hexazinone on invertebrates after application to forested watersheds. Archives Environ. Contamin. Toxicology 11: 209–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayeux, H. S.Jr. and Hamilton, W. T. 1983. Response of common goldenweed (Isocoma coronopifolia) and buffelgrass (Cenchrus ciliaris) to fire and soil-applied herbicides. Weed Sci. 31: 355–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. H. 1988. Soil spot herbicides for single-stem hardwood control. South. J. Appl. For. 12: 199–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickles, J. K., Tauer, C. G. and Stritzke, J. F. 1981. Use of prescribed fire and hexazinone (Velpar) to thin understory shortleaf pine in an Oklahoma pine-hardwood stand. South. J. Appl. For. 5: 124–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, R. C., Krause, R. L. and Williams, M. H. 1980. Microbial activity in soils treated with hexazinone. Soil Sci. 129: 311–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, L. E. and Myers, R. L. 1989. Seasonal effects of prescribed burning in Florida: a review. The Nature Conservancy Fire Management and Research Program. Tallahassee, Florida, 89 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, D. and Bower, D. 1970. Volume tables for young loblolly, slash, and longleaf pines in plantations in south Mississippi. USDA Forest Serv., South. Forest Exp. Sta., New Orleans, Louisiana. Res. Note SO-102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silker, T. H. 1961. Prescribed burning to control undesirable hardwoods in southern pine stands. Texas Forest Serv. Bull. 51: 44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. W. and James, T. D. 1978. Characteristics of prescribed burns and resultant shortterm environmental changes in Populus tremuloides woodlands in southern Ontario. Can. J. Bot. 56: 1782–1791.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spurr, S. H. and Barnes, B. V. 1973. Forest Ecology. Second edition. The Ronald Press Company, New York, 571 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tappeiner, J. C.II. 1979. Effect of fire and 2,4-D on the early stages of beaked hazel (Corylus cornuta) understories. Weed Sci. 27: 162–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade, D. D. 1993. Thinning young loblolly pine stands with fire. Int. J. Wildland Fire 3: 169–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wahlenberg, W. G. 1960. Loblolly Pine Its Use, Ecology, Regeneration, Protection, Growth and Management. The School of Forestry, Duke University, Seeman Printery Inc., Durham, NC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldrop, T. A. and Lloyd, F. T. 1988. Precommercial thinning a sapling-sized loblolly pine stand with fire. South. J. Appl. For. 12: 203–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yocum, H. A. 1972. Burning to reduce understory hardwoods in the Arkansas Mountains. USDA Forest Serv., South. Forest Exp. Sta., New Orleans, Louisiana. Res. Note SO-145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zedaker, S. M., Smith, D. Wm., Kreh, R. E. and Fredericksen, T. S. 1989. The development of five-year-old mixed upland hardwood stands, pp. 100–106. In: Waldrop, T. A. (Ed) Proceedings of Pine-Hardwood Mixtures: A Symposium on Management and Ecology of the Type. USDA Forest Serv., Southeast. Forest Exp. Sta., Asheville, North Carolina. Gen. Tech. Rep. SE-58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zutter, B. R., Gjerstad, D. H., Webb, A. L. and Glover, G. R. 1988. Response of a young loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) plantation to herbicide treatments using hexazinone. Auburn Univ. Silvic. Herbicide Cooperative. Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama. Res. Note 88–1.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Haywood, J.D. Prescribed burning and hexazinone herbicide as release treatments in a sapling hardwood-loblolly pine stand. New Forest 10, 39–53 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00034175

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00034175

Key words

Navigation