Skip to main content
Log in

Land/Inland water ecotones: intermediate habitats critical for conservation and management

  • Epilogue
  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Agostinho, A. & M. Zalewski, 1995. The dependence of fish community structure and dynamics on floodplain and riparian ecotone zone in Parana River, Brazil, Hydrobiologia 303 (Dev. Hydrobiol. 105): 141–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bretschko, G., 1995. River/land ecotones: scales and patterns. Hydrobiologia 303 (Dev. Hydrobiol. 105): 83–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coelho, M. M. & M. Zalewski, 1995. Evolutionary adaptations by fish to ecotonal complexity in spatially variable landscapes — a perspective. Hydrobiologia 303 (Dev. Hydrobiol. 105): 223–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dgebuadze, Y., 1995. The land/inland water ecotones and fish population of Lake Valley (West Mongolia). Hydrobiologia 303 (Dev. Hydrobiol. 105): 237–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, A. & J. Kubecka, 1995. Land/water ecotone effects in reservoirs on the fish fauna. Hydrobiologia 303 (Dev. Hydrobiol. 105): 11–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J. B., B. J. Danielson & H. R. Pulliam, 1992. Ecological processes that affect populations in complex landscapes. Oikos 65: 169–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankel, O. H. & M. E. Soule, 1981. Conservation and evolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 327 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, M. M., 1988. SCOPE/MAB technical consultations on landscape boundaries. In: Di Castri (ed.). A new look at ecotones: Merging international projects on landscape boundaries. Biology International. Special issue 17: 47–106.

  • Junk, W. J., P. B. Bayley & R. E. Sparks, 1989. The flood pluse concept in river-floodplain systems. In: D. P. Dodge (ed.), Proceedings of The International Large River Symposium. Can. Spec. Publ. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 106: 110–127.

  • Jungwirth, M., S. Muhar & S. Schmutz, 1995. The effects of recreated instream and ecotone structures on the fish-fauna of an epipotamal river. Hydrobiologia 303 (Dev. Hydrobiol. 105): 195–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolasa, J. & L. Weber, 1995. Relationship between the spatial scale and biotic variability in a wetland ecotone. Hydrobiologia 303 (Dev. Hydrobiol. 105): 61–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolasa, J. & M. Zalewski, 1995. Notes on ecotone attributes and functions. Hydrobiologia 303 (Dev. Hydrobiol. 105): 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirchhofer, A., 1995. Morphological variability in the ecotone — an important factor for the conservation of fish species richness in Swiss rivers. Hydrobiologia 303 (Dev. Hydrobiol. 105): 103–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matena, J., 1995. The role of ecotones as feeding grounds for fish fry in a Bohemian water supply reservoir. Hydrobiologia 303 (Dev. Hydrobiol. 105): 31–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • McQueen, D. J., M. R. S. Johannes, J. R. Post, T. J. Stewart & D. R. S. Lean, 1989. Bottom-up and top-down impacts on freshwater pelagic community structure. Ecol. Monogr. 59: 289–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muhar, S., S. Schmutz & M. Jungwirth, 1995. River restoration concepts-goals and perspectives. Hydrobiologia 303 (Dev. Hydrobiol. 105): 183–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naiman, R. J., H. Decamps, J. Pastor & C. A. Johnston, 1988. The potential importance of boundaries to fluvial ecosystems. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc. 7: 289–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nevo, E., 1988. Genetic diversity in nature. Patterns and theory. In: M. K. Hecht & B. Wallace (eds). Evol. Biol. 23: 217–246.

  • Penczak, T., 1995. Effects of removal and regeneration of bankside vegetation on fish population dynamics in the Warta River, Poland. Hydrobiologia 303 (Dev. Hydrobiol. 105): 207–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Power, G. & M. Power, 1995. Ecotones and fluvial regimes in arctic lotic environments. Hydrobiologia 303 (Dev. Hydrobiol. 105): 111–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabeni, C. F. & M. A. Smale, 1995. Effects of siltation on stream fishes and the potential mitigating role of the buffering riparian zone. Hydrobiologia 303 (Dev. Hydrobiol. 105): 211–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salo, J., R. Kalliola, I. Hakkinen, Y. Makinen, P. Niemela, M. Puhakka & P. D. Coley, 1986. River dynamics and the diversity of Amazon lowland forests. Nature 322: 254–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiemer, F., T. Spindler, H. Wintersberger, A. Schneider & A. Chovanec, 1991. Fish fry associations: Important indicators for the ecological status of large rivers, Verh. int. Ver. Limnol. 24: 2497–2500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiemer, F. & M. Zalewski, 1992: The importance of riparian ecotones for diversity and productivity of riverine fish communities. Neth. J. Zool. 42: 323–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlosser, I. J., 1995. Critical landscape attributes that influence fish population dynamics in headwater streams. Hydrobiologia 303 (Dev. Hydrobiol. 105): 71–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro J., V. Lamarra & M. Lynch, 1975. Biomanipulation: an ecosystem approach to lake restoration. Limnology Research Centre, University of Minnesota 143: 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, J. & D. I. Wright, 1984. Lake restoration by biomanipulation: Round Lake, Minnesota — the first two years. Freshwat. Biol. 14: 371–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonian, A., I. Tátrai, P. Bíró, G. Paulovits, L. G.-Tóth & G. Lakatos, 1995. Biomass of planktonic crustaceans and the food of young cyprinids in the littoral zone of Lake Balaton. Hydrobiologia 303 (Dev. Hydrobiol. 105): 39–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wanzenböck, J. & K. Keresztessy, 1995. Zonation of a lentic ecotone and its correspondence to life history strategies in fish. Hydrobiologia 303 (Dev. Hydrobiol. 105): 249–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetzel, R. G., 1990. Land-water interfaces: metabolic and limnological regulators. Verh. int. Ver. Limnol. 24: 6–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vannote, R. L., G. W. Minshall, K. W. Cummins, J. R. Sedell & C. E. Cushing, 1980. The River Continuum Concept. Can. J. Fish. aquat. Sci. 37: 130–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winemiller, K. O., 1992. Life-history strategies and the effectiveness of sexual selection. Oikos 63: 318–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zalewski, M., P. Frankiewicz & M. Nowak, 1995. Biomanipulation by ecotone management in a lowland reservoir. Hydrobiologia 303 (Dev. Hydrobiol. 105): 49–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zalewski, M., W. Puchalski, P. Frankiewicz & M. Nowak, 1991. The relation between primary production and fish biomass distribution in an upland river system. Verh. int. Ver. Limnol. 24: 2493–2496.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zweimüller, I., 1995. Microhabitat use by two small benthic stream fish in a 2nd order stream. Hydrobiologia 303 (Dev. Hydrobiol. 105): 125–138.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schierner, F., Zalewski, M. & Thorpe, J.E. Land/Inland water ecotones: intermediate habitats critical for conservation and management. Hydrobiologia 303, 259–264 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00034063

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00034063

Key words

Navigation