Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of mode I and mode II elastic-plastic fracture toughness for two low alloyed high strength steels

  • Published:
International Journal of Fracture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the present work, mode I and mode II tests were carried out on two low alloyed high strength steels. An asymmetrical four point bend specimen and J II-integral vs. crack growth resistance curve technique were used for determining the mode II elastic-plastic fracture toughness, J IIc · J II-integral expression of the specimen was calibrated by finite element method. The results indicate that the present procedure for determining the J IIc values is easy to use. Moreover, the mode I fracture toughness J Ic is very sensitive to the rolling direction of the test steels, but the mode II fracture toughness J IIc is completely insensitive to the rolling direction of the steels, and the J IIc /J Ic ratio is not a constant for the two steels, including the same steel with different orientations. Finally, the difference of the fracture toughness between the mode I and mode II is discussed with consideration of the different fracture mechanisms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. D.L. Jones and D.B. Chisholm, Engineering Fracture Mechanics 7 (1975) 261–270.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Y.W. Mai and B. Cotterell, Advances in Fracture Research, K. Salama et al. (eds.), Pergamon Press (1989) 2269–2278.

  3. L. Banks-Sills and D. Sherman, International Journal of Fracture 50 (1991) 15–26.

    Google Scholar 

  4. J.G. Cowie and F.R. Tuler, International Journal of Fracture 47 (1991) 229–239.

    Google Scholar 

  5. T. Fett, International Journal of Fracture 48 (1991) R67-R74.

    Google Scholar 

  6. K.J. Wang, C.L. Hsu and H. Kao, in Advances in Research on the Strength and Fracture of Materials, D.M.R. Taplin (ed.) Vol. 4, Pergamon Press (1977) 123–133.

  7. H. Gao, M.W. Brown and K.J. Miller, Fatigue and Fracture of Engineering Materials and Structures 5 (1982) 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  8. ASTM E813-87, Standard test method for J Ic , a measure of fracture toughness (1987).

  9. M.K. Tseng and H.L. Marcus, Engineering Fracture Mechanics 16 (1982) 895–903.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Y.W. Shi, Z.X. Han, N.N. Zhou and J. Li, Engineering Fracture Mechanics 41 (1992) 143–151.

    Google Scholar 

  11. C.F. Shih, Fracture Analysis, ASTM STP 560 (1974) 187–210.

  12. J.T. Barnby, Y.W. Shi and A.S. Nadkarni, International Journal of Fracture 25 (1984) 273–283.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Y.W. Shi, J.T. Barnby and A.S. Nadkarni, Engineering Fracture Mechanics 39 (1991) 37–44.

    Google Scholar 

  14. S.H. Goods and L.M. Brown, Acta Metallurgica 27 (1979) 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shi, Y.W., Zhou, N.N. & Zhang, J.X. Comparison of mode I and mode II elastic-plastic fracture toughness for two low alloyed high strength steels. Int J Fract 68, 89–97 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00032328

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00032328

Keywords

Navigation