Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of photoperiod and temperature on flowering in mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek)

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Forty strains of mungbeans, including all of the entries in the 1st and 2nd International Mungbean Nurseries (IMN), were grown in plant growth chambers in photoperiods of 12, 13, 14, 15, and 16 hours and mean temperatures of 18, 23, and 28°C. Results show that (1) mungbean strains differ in their flowering response to photoperiod and to mean temperature; (2) increasing the photoperiod of reducing the mean temperature delayed flowering, the amount of delay varied with the strain: (3) variations in mean temperature may alter the effect of the photoperiod on flowering in particular strains. Twenty-five strains which flowered in all photoperiod-temperature treatments could be divided into four groups, each group being successively later in flowering. The remaining 15 strains could be divided into four groups, according to their failure to flower within 105 days in specific photoperiod-temperature treatments. Flowering response in the growth chamber is useful in explaining flowering response in the 2nd IMN at three locations varying from 14°N to 49°N latitude.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allard, H. A. & W. J. Zaumeyer, 1944. Responses of beans (Phaseolus) and other legumes to length of day. US Dept. Agric. Tech. Bull. 867.

  • Anonymous, 1974. Annual report for 1972 1973. Asian Vegetable Research and Development Center, Shanhua, Taiwan, Republic of China.

  • Anonymous, 1975. Annual report for 1974, Asian Vegetable Research and Development Center. Shanhua, Taiwan. Republic of China.

  • Bashandi, Moheb M. H. & J. M., Poehlman, 1974. Photoperiod response in mungbeans (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek). Euphytica 23: 691–697.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byth, D. E., 1968. Comparative photoperiodic responses for several soya bean varieties of tropical and temperate origin. Aust. J. agric. Res. 19: 879–890.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coyne, Dermot P., 1966. The genetics of photoperiodism and the effect of temperature on the photoperiodic response for time of flowering in Phaseolus vulgaris L. varieties. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 89: 350–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crisweli, J. G. & D. J., Hume. 1972. Variation in sensitivity to photoperiod among early maturing soybean strains. Crop Sci. 12: 657–660.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garner, W. W. & H. A., Allard, 1930. Photoperiodic response of soybeans in relation to temprature and other environmental factors. J. agric. Res. 41: 719–735.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann, Richard W. 1969. Photoperiod responses of Phascolus plant introductions in Hawaii. J. Am. Soc. hort. Sci. 94: 437–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawn, R. J. & D. E., Byth. 1973. Response of soya beans to planting date in South-Eastern Queensland. Aust. J. agric. Res. 24: 67–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Major, D. J., D. R., Johnson, J. W., Tanner & I. C., Anderson, 1975. Effects of daylength and temperature on soybean development. Crop Sci. 15: 174–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murneek, A. E. 1948. History of research in photoperiodism. In: A. E. Murneek & R. O. Whyte (Ed.), Vernalization and photoperiodism. Chronica Botanica Co., p. 39–61.

  • Padda, Darshan S. & Henry, M. Munger, 1969. Photoperiod, temperature and genotype interactions affecting time of flowering in beans, Phaseolus vulgaris L. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 94: 157–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, M. W. & H. A., Borthwick, 1939. Effect of variation in temperature during photoperiodic induction upon initiation of flower primordia in Biloxi soybean. Bot. Gaz. 101: 145–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poehlman, J. M., D. T. Sechler, J. M. Yohe, E. E. Wati, R. E. Swindel & M. M. H. Bashandi, 1973. Performance of the first international mungbean nursery. Spec. Rep. 158, Missouri agric. Exp. Stn.

  • Poehlman, J. M., D. T. Sechler, J. M. Yohe, E. E. Wati, R. E. Swindell & Ellis Benham, 1974. Performance of the second international mungbean nursery. Spec. Rep. 171. Missouri agric Exp. Stn.

  • Polson, D. E. 1972. Day-neutrality in soybeans. Crop Sci. 12: 773–776.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, R. H. & B. E., Struckmeyer, 1938. The effects of temperature and other environmental factors upon the photoperiodic responses of some of the higher plants. J. agric. Res. 56: 633–646.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen Gupta, J. C. & D. K., Mukherji, 1949. Studies on the physiology of growth and development of mung (Phaseolus aureus Roxb.) (a) Effect of the time of sowing, (b) vernalization and photoperiodism. Indian J. agric. Sci. 19: 207–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, Robert A. & W. W., Garner, 1936. Response of certain plants to length of day and temperature under controlled conditions. J. agric. Res. 52: 943–960.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Contribution No 7516 from the Missouri Agricultural Experiment Station.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vas Aggarwal, D., Poehlman, J. Effects of photoperiod and temperature on flowering in mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek). Euphytica 26, 207–219 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00032086

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00032086

Index words

Navigation