Summary
The effect of bulk breeding on yield and its components was studied in two high-yielding and two low-yielding bean crosses until the F6 generation. It was found that bulk breeding on the whole did not alter the mean values in the high-yielding crosses, but that there was a steady increase in the mean values of the low-yielding crosses with generation. As well as mean values the use of variance as a determinant of cross potential was also studied. It was found for characters markedly influenced in their expression by the environment, of which grain yield is the prime example, that progeny variance did not differ significantly from parental variance. It was concluded that interplant competition was the factor of the environment responsible for this effect.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allard, R. W., 1960. Principles of plant breeding, John Wiley and Son, New York.
Allard, R. W., 1961. Relationship between genetic diversity and consistency of performance in different environments. Crop. Sci. 1: 127–133.
Allard, R. W. & J., Adams, 1969. The role of intergenotypic interactions in plant breeding. Proc. 12th int. Congr. Genet. 3: 349–370.
Allard, R. W. & P. E., Hansche, 1965. Population and biometrical genetics in plant breeding. Proc. 11th int. Congr. Genet. 3: 665–679.
Allard, R. W. & S. K., Jain, 1962. Population studies in predominantly self-pollinated species. II. Analysis of quantitative changes in a bulk hybrid population of barley. Evolution 16: 90–101.
Allard, R. W., S. K., Jain & P. L., Workman, 1968. The genetics of inbreeding populations. Adv. Genet. 14: 55–131.
Coyne, D. P., 1968. Correlation, heritability and selection of yield components in field beans, Phaseolus vulgaris L. Proc. Am. Soc. hort. Sci. 93: 388–396.
Donald, C. M., 1968. The breeding of crop ideotypes. Euphytica 17: 385–403.
Evans, A. M., 1973. Genetic improvement of Phaseolus vulgaris. Proc. PAG Symp. FAO (Rome) 107–115.
Hamblin, J., 1975. Effect of environment, seed size and competitive ability on yield and survival of Phaseolus vulgaris L. genotypes in mixtures. Euphytica 24: 435–445.
Hamblin, J. & C. M., Donald, 1974. The relationships between plant form, competitive ability and grain yield in a barley crop. Euphytica 23: 519–526.
Hamblin, J. & A. M., Evans, 1976. The estimation of cross yield using early generation and parental yields in dry beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Euphytica 25: 515–520.
Hamblin, J. & J. G., Rowell, 1975. Breeding implications of the relationship between competitive ability and pure cultue yield in self-pollinated grain crops. Euphytica 24: 221–228.
Hurd, E. A., 1969. A method of breeding for yield of wheat in semiarid climates. Euphytica 18: 217–226.
Jain, S. K., 1961. Studies in the breeding of self-pollinated cereals. The composite cross bulk population method. Euphytica 10: 315–324.
McGinnis, G. K. & L. H. Shebeshi, 1968. The reliability of single plant selection for yield in the F2. Proc. 3rd int. Wheat Genet. Symp. (Canberra, Australian Academy of Science) 109–114.
Mal, B., 1969. Genotypic and phenotypic variability in yield and other quantitative characters in peas. Indian J. Hered. 1: 99–104.
Pinchinat, A. M. & M. W., Adams, 1966. Yield components in beans, as affected by intercrossing and neutron irradiation. Turrialba 16: 247–252.
Quinones, F. A., 1965. Correlations of characters in dry beans. Proc. Am. Soc. hort. Sci. 86: 368–372.
Suneson, C. A., 1956. An evolutionary plant breeding method. Agron. J. 48: 188–191.
Suneson, C. A. & H. Stevens, 1953. Studies with bulk hybrid populations of barley. Tech. Bull. U.S. Dep. Agric. 1067.
Tucker, C. L. & B. D., Webster, 1970. Relation of seed yield and fitness in Phaseolus lunatus L. Crop Sci. 10: 314–315.
Walker, J. T., 1969. Selection and quantitative characters in field crops. Biol. Rev. 44: 207–243.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hamblin, J. Plant breeding interpretations of the effects of bulk breeding on four populations of beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Euphytica 26, 157–168 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00032081
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00032081