Summary
Quantitative variability for seed yield and six other characters was analysed in Lotus corniculatus L. cv. Leo. The material consisted of 144 polycross progenies and 100 parents.
Wide variability existed for all characters. The characters with the greatest variability were seed yield, forage grading and plant height. The polycross progeny test was employed to study the general combining ability of the parents. Highly significant differences existed for all seven characters under study.
Parent-offspring genotypic and phenotypic correlations were high and significant for all characters except genotypic correlations for seed yield and seeds per pod. High h2 values (broad sense) were obtained for seed size and days to flowering. Traits with moderate to high h2 were seed yield (71% in parents, 64% in progenies), plant height, forage grading, and seeds per pod. The character pods per inflorescence had the lowest h2.
Positive estimates of % MathType!MTEF!2!1!+-% feaafiart1ev1aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn% hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr% 4rNCHbGeaGak0dh9WrFfpC0xh9vqqj-hEeeu0xXdbba9frFj0-OqFf% ea0dXdd9vqaq-JfrVkFHe9pgea0dXdar-Jb9hs0dXdbPYxe9vr0-vr% 0-vqpWqaaeaabiGaaiaacaqabeaadaqaaqaaaOqaaiqabo8agaqcaK% aaavaabeqaceaaaeaacaqGYaaabaGaaeiraaaaaaa!3A89!\[{\text{\hat \sigma }}\begin{array}{*{20}c} {\text{2}} \\ {\text{D}} \\ \end{array} \] were obtained only for seed size. The ratio of dominance variance to additive variance indicated partial dominance for this character. Except for seed yield, in all other cases these estimates had very high sampling errors. In all cases except pods per inflorescence and seeds per pod high positive estimates of % MathType!MTEF!2!1!+-% feaafiart1ev1aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn% hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr% 4rNCHbGeaGak0dh9WrFfpC0xh9vqqj-hEeeu0xXdbba9frFj0-OqFf% ea0dXdd9vqaq-JfrVkFHe9pgea0dXdar-Jb9hs0dXdbPYxe9vr0-vr% 0-vqpWqaaeaabiGaaiaacaqabeaadaqaaqaaaOqaaiqbeo8aZzaaja% qbaeqabiqaaaqcaauaaiaaikdaaKaaGeaacaqGbbaaaaaa!3B30!\[\hat \sigma \begin{array}{*{20}c} 2 \\ {\text{A}} \\ \end{array} \] were obtained.
The data indicated that it may be possible to simultaneously improve seed yield and maintain forage yield. Seed yield had positive and significant associations with seed size, seeds per pod and pods per inflorescence. The associations of days to flowering with forage grading (negative) and with pods per inflorescence (positive) were also significant.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aalders, Lewis, E., 1966. A recurrent selection program for perennial crop speetes designed to minimize inbreeding. Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 8: 293–295.
Aibrechtsen, R. S., R. L., Davis & W. F., Keim, 1966. Components of seed yield and associated characteristies in Lotus corniculatus L. Crop Sci. 6: 355–358.
Bresciani, J. C., 1971. The examination of seed yield potential in certain genotypes of birdsfoot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus L.). M.S. thesis, Oregon State University.
Bubar, J. S. 1958. An association between variability in ovule development within ovaries and self-incompatibility in Lotus (Leguminosae). Can. J. Bot. 36: 65–72.
Buzzell, R. I. & C. P., Wilsie, 1964. Seed production potential of flowering types in birdsfoot trefoil. Crop Sci. 4: 436–437.
Conje Jr, A. M., 1971. Performance of crosses within and between two diverse sources of birdsfoot trefoil, Ph.D. thesis, Iowa State University.
Davis, R. L., 1955. An evaluation of s1 and polycross progeny testing in alfalfa. Agron J. 47: 572–576.
Davis, R. L. & C. A., Panton, 1962. Combining ability in alfalfa. Crop Sci. 2: 35–37.
Draper, A. D., 1964. Selection for seed size in Lotus corniculatus L. Diss. Abstr. 25. order No 64 10, 636.
Draper, A. D. & C. P., Wilsie, 1965. Recurrent selection for seed size in birdsfoot trefoil, Lotus corniculatus L. Crop Sci. 5: 313–315.
Falconer, D. S., 1960. Introduction to quantitative genetics. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh London 365 pp.
Kempthorne, O., 1955. The correlation between relatives in a simple autotetraploid population. Genetics 40: 168–174.
Laczynska-Hulewicz, T., 1961. Some morphological characters and their correlation in di- and tetraploid forms of Lotus corniculatus L. Genetica Polonica 2: 25–33.
Li, C. C. 1956. The concept of path coefficients and its impact on population genetics. Biomatrics 12: 190–210.
Lindsey, M. F., J. H., Lonnquist & C. O., Gardner, 1962. Estimates of genetic variance in open-pollinated varietics of corn-belt corn. Crop Sci. 2: 105–108.
Miller, John D., 1968. Combining ability studies in birdsfoot trefoil. Crop Sci. 8: 41–43.
Mode, C. J. & H. F., Robinson, 1959: Pleiotropism and the genetic variance and covariance. Biometrics 15: 518–537.
Peacock, H. A. & C. P., Wilsie, 1960. Selection for vegetative vigour and seed setting in birdsfoot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus L.). Agron. J. 52: 321–324.
Seaney, Robert R. & Paul, R. Hanson, 1970. Birdsfoot trefoil. Adv. Agron. 22: 120–157.
Sprague, G. F. & W. T., Federer, 1951. A comparison of variance components in corn yield trials. II. Error, year × variety, location × variety, and variety components. Agron. J. 43: 535–541.
Twamley, B. E., 1969: Seedling vigour studies in Morshansk birdsfoot trefoil. Can. J. Pl. Sci. 49: 203–208.
Twamley, B. E., 1971. Studies on seed size in birdsfoot trefoil. Can. J. Pl. Sci. 51: 71–72.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sandha, G.S., Twamley, B.E. & Christie, B.R. Analysis of quantitative variability for seed yield and related characters in Lotus corniculatus L. cv. Leo. Euphytica 26, 113–122 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00032076
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00032076