Skip to main content
Log in

Affinity analysis: effects of sampling

  • Published:
Vegetatio Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

I explored the effects of sampling on three measures of regional diversity: γ diversity (the number of species), β diversity (mean similarity among sites), and μ diversity (mosaic diversity and structure around mean similarity). Two sampling effects were modelled by computer simulation, number of sites sampled and intensity of sampling within sites, using plant community data from Michigan, North Carolina, and Costa Rica. Estimates of the number of species were sensitive to both sampling effects. Estimates of mean similarity were unaffected by the number of sites sampled but were sensitive to the intensity of sampling. Estimates of mosaic diversity were relatively unaffected by the number of sites sampled, if the number was above 30 sites and outlier sites were removed, and were not sensitive to the intensity of sampling. I offer mean similarity as a multi-gradient complement to β diversity measured as the turnover of species along a single gradient.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen T. F. H. & Starr T. B. 1982. Hierarchy perspectives for ecological complexity. University of Chicago Press. Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avena G., Blasi C., Feoli E. & Scoppola A. 1981. Measurement of the predictive value of species lists for species cover in phytosociological samples. Vegetatio 45: 77–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans F. C. 1952. The influence of size of quadrat on the distributional patterns of plant populations. Contrib. Lab. Vert. Biol. Univ. Mich. 54: 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faith D. P. 1983. Asymmetric binary similarity measures. Oecologia 57: 287–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faith D. P., Minchin P. R. & Belbin L. 1987. Compositional dissimilarity as a robust measure of ecological distance. Vegetatio 69: 57–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleason H. A. 1920. Some applications of the quadrat model. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 47: 21–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heltshe J. F. 1988. Jackknife estinate of the matching coefficient of similarity. Biometrics 44: 447–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holdridge L. R., Grenke W. C., Hatheway W. H., Liang T. & TosiJr. T. A. 1971. Forest environments in tropical life zones: A pilot study. Pergamon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Istock C. A. & Scheiner S. M. 1987. Affinities and high-order diversity within landscape mosaics. Evolutionary Ecology 1: 11–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaccard P. 1901. Distribution de la flore alpine dans le Bassin des Dranes et dans quelques regions voisines. Bulletin Soc. Vaud. Sci. Nat. 37: 241–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janson S. & Vegelius J. 1981. Measures of ecological association. Oecologia 49: 371–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knox R. G. & Peet R. K. 1989. Bootstrapped ordination: a method for estimating sampling effects in indirect gradient analysis. Vegetatio 80: 153–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller R. I. & Wiegert R. G. 1989. Documentary completeness, species-area relations, and the species-abundance distribution of a regional flora. Ecology 70: 16–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oosting H. J. 1942. An ecological analysis of the plant communities of Piedmont, North Carolina. Amer. Midl. Nat. 28: 1–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minchin P. R. 1987. An evaluation of the relative robustness of techniques for ecological ordination. Vegetatio 69: 89–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peet R. K. 1974. The measurement of species diversity. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 5: 285–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Routledge R. D. 1984. Estimating ecological components of diversity. Oikos 42: 23–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheiner S. M. & Istock C. A. 1987. Affinity analysis: methodologies and statistical inference. Vegetatio 72: 89–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker R. H. 1972. Evolution and measurement of species diversity. Taxon 21: 213–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker R. H. 1977. Evolution of species diversity in land communities. In: M. K. Hecht, W. C. Steere & B. Wallace (eds), Evolutionary biology, pp. 1–67. Plenum Publishing Co., N.Y.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson M. V. 1981. A statistical test of the accuracy and consistency of ordinations. Ecology 62: 8–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson M. V. & Shmida A. 1984. Measuring beta diversity with presence-absence data. J. Ecol. 72: 1055–1064.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolda H. 1981. Similarity indices, sample size, and diversity. Oecologia 50: 296–302.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Scheiner, S.M. Affinity analysis: effects of sampling. Vegetatio 86, 175–181 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00031733

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00031733

Keywords

Navigation